Where were you when even liberals started calling out The Daily Show for making shit up?

Where were you when even liberals started calling out The Daily Show for making shit up?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=72UPxDFPKDs
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Is this about Trevor Nigger

Yep.

youtube.com/watch?v=72UPxDFPKDs

Daily Show stopped being relevant when Bush left office.

>he hasn't moved on to The Daily Shoah

>real name Carl
>the Cuck

>Decide to watch it
>He's just crying about the wage gap
>I have to sit through some condescending arm-chair economist's lecture while staring at a smug picture of Sargon smoking a cigar.

100% sure this dude doesn't have anything unique or interesting to say.

He has a nice voice and is sexy beardaddy-mode IRL, would let him fug my boipuzz.

ok user
>i have to sit through
you don't

>pretends to "have to do something" while being perfectly free not to do so

woman detected

How is watching shit like Sargon any different from being part of some sjw safespace? It's all just an echochamber reinforcing your own preconceived notions.

they knew it too ...

That is a girl with a beard. right?

You didn't play MGS2? This is what was always predicted for the future m8. This is why we need the Lalilulelo.

>anything that criticizes SJWs for saying blatantly made up shit is just as bad as SJWs saying blatantly made up shit
You sure convinced me, I'm a #CruzMissile now.

>Doesn't block comments
>Has hangouts with conservatives and alt-right peeps while being left-liberal
>has video's against conservatism
>Has hangouts and debates with feminists
>provides many links
>engages with what SJW's have written instead of just creating strawmen


Yes, exactly the same as SJW's like Anita. Sarkeesian.

because it's TRUTH

How many times do you think he's let Milo suck his dick?

kinda like how Communist Russia wasn't much different then Fascist Germany

but user,it was vastly different
where did you grow up,america?
also,than****

Watching a man shoot fish in a barrel just seems like a waste of time to me. Remember, a circlejerk is still a circlejerk no matter the political alignment.

Sometimes I find him fucking irritating but at least he backs up his points with actual evidence and allows feedback so people can point out when he's wrong, and when they do, he admits he's wrong. I hardly ever see SJW's do any of these things.

Issues are binary, meaning one of the 2 solutions is right. And unlike SJWs, who live in safespaces, rightwinger actually encourage debates and replies. Issue of safespace itself is binary, SJWs say Yes to it and Nazis say no to it. I hope this answers your question if you are being serious.

This video isn't about some tumblrite with a blog, it's about a major television show. If anything, the deck is stacked in favor of Trevor Noah here.

Stop conflating two seperate arguments.

You might argue that Sargon is too shallow, goes for easy targets, repeats himself too much, is too simplistic in his use of philosophical concepts, focusses too much on incidents, etc, but it doesn't follow from that, that he is 'just like the SJW's'. He just isn't, for all the reasons I mentioned above.

If you actively go out of your way to talk to people you disagree with, that is the exact opposite of a circlejerk, whether you like, or agree with, his content or not.

Frankly I don't care about the SJW positions, but watching the counter positions is almost as cringe, but I have to because it's harder to see what their saying. The SJW is easy to understand, the counter SJW do show some great intelligence, but it's only relevant in counter TO SJW. So if I don't care about SJW I don't have a reason to care about counter-SJW.

social justice is actively lying to people. There are real world consequences if we just let people blantantly lie without opposition. In the case of the daily show segment that woman strait up LIED when she said she doesn't get paid when they lose a game.

The issue I have isn't with Sargon himself but his viewers like OP. They're not going into his content to have their views challenged, they're going in there to be reassured their political ideology is right, just how a sjw goes and watches anita. Intellectually it seems like a waste of time.

Didn't you hear he saying to idiots like you to go fuck off?

You're missing his point entirely

>SJW is easy to understand,

What the actual fuck? Have you ever try to read some academic postmodern SJW texts? It's obscurantist goalshifting at its finest.

'Anti-SJW' isn't one thing. Neo-nazis are anti-SJW, because they hate blacks and jews (although the latter might be excusable, free palestine!) But stating bland core liberal believes such as 'halloween costumes shouldn't be banned' also makes you 'anti-SJW', because your 'micro-aggressions perpertuate systems of oppression of the straight white male capitalist kyriarchy'

They attack the very core of liberal democracies, the meta-political structure that makes all other political and academic discourse possible. If you enjoy posting on chan boards, that already makes it relevant to pay attention to SJW's. Not for every irrelevant scandal about sexism in comics or whatever, but because of it's structure in academica, and how it undermines productive discussion of very important issues, such as Islamism, leaving it to extremists of all sides.

I wish I could grow a beard like that ..

That's retarded. Everything can be dismissed on those grounds.

Also, I doubt that's true for all or most of his viewers, considering the vivid discussions in the comments, and the backlash he gets for specific videos.

Sargon is the audio/visual equivalent of beating up a kid in a wheelchair. Why don't these fuckers ever take on anything challenging? Probably would lose some of that 14 year old Sup Forums audience but it would be more interesting.

How?

It's not a circlejerk if people of various views come together, or if they actually try to influence the larger media discourse, which Sargon does through GamgerGate and petitions.

You might think he failed in all that, but it still isn't a circlejerk or echochamber.

>gorilla tier thick black body hair on every inch of myself
>but balding
>and can't grow a beard

Thanks genes.

> What the actual fuck? Have you ever try to read some academic postmodern SJW texts? It's obscurantist goalshifting at its finest.
So please show us the examples that backs up this argument.

>Why don't these fuckers ever take on anything challenging?
Is taking on the veracity of one of the most famous political shows in existence not supposed to be challenging?

You can always tell when a guy looks like his body is made of silly putty underneath his clothes, They try to grow beards in an effort to make themselves seem more manly, but all that does is make them look more soft and ridiculous. Fat guy with beard is a red flag for "I'm probably a little bitch with delusions of grandeur."

Sargon looks like he's never done a hard day's work in his entire life. He's the kind of fat fuck who would be the first to die in a catastrophe, if only because the fucker can't run ten feet before getting deathly winded. This is your hero. This is the guy who "you identify with" because you're probably fat no-account loser also.

Sargon of Akkad isn't even white. I bet he's some mutt.

Hes saying there are a lot of people who only listen to people like Sargon, and completely ignore other points of view. A lot of the time these same people will turn around and accuse others of only existing inside echo chambers while they themselves do the same thing.

It really just comes down to the rationale that everything I do and believe is rational and intelligent, and all other opposing views are flawed and idiotic.

Eat clen n tren hard u bitch

>watch one-tenth of a video
>get really mad and stop watching it
>pretend to have an interesting opinion about it
No one cares, user.

>its a nothing is actually happening episode

>pretending to have any opinion on it

Fixed it for you, lad

Not really

In fact sargon got butthurt that so many of his fans thought his petition to ban sjw classes was stupid

Sargon isn't a liberal. He's a centrist. You know, those people that actually have sense.

He's not an athlete and no one expects him to be. You are correct in that assumption but physical fitness and appearance has nothing to do with what he's talking about.

Damn he is actually a bit handsome, but he is fat as fuck.

He's usually right - and he backs up most of his claims with facts.

But I think you're right that it feeds the same sort of confirmation bias that a feminist would watching lacy green

We should never, ever discuss or debate then is what you're saying.

He's whatever is most convenient for his audience. When he agrees with them that's they call him a centrist or centre right and boast about how supposedly universal the agreement for their points of view is. When he disagrees with them he turns into radical socialist and they can backtrack and say he was always shit. It's mental gymnastics people that support YouTube pundits do to avoid egg on their face.

Most people I know on the new right think he is a complete faggot

>Sargon of Akkad
He's an idiot that doesn't know half the shit he's trying to talk about. And this is coming from someone who kind of shares his views. My main problem is he tries to look smarter than he actually is. He has claimed a bunch of ridiculous stuff, like...
>nazism is a left wing ideology
>I'm a classic liberal, but don't touch welfare, we also need to control markets, I'm a classic liberal by the way.
>Wanted to see Donald Trump win the republican primary only to flip back to Sanders a few months later
>Doesn't understand dialectics beyond poor people good, rich people bad, disregarding Hegel
>swears reading the communist manifesto is enough to understand marxism
>said the USSR was a failed state, even if the USSR laster for like 80 years
>claims meritocracy is the best thing since democracy, even though it's a mundane thing that is mostly common among bureaucrats.
>generally acts in a condescending way, trying to sound as if he knows what he's talking about when in reality he skipped over a wiki article and read a few books.
Also, if you watch a SINGLE of his videos, Youtube will fill your recommended section with MRA, MGTOW, anti-SJW, anti-feminist and red pill videos, and it will not go away until you clean your history. He's the chlamydia of Youtube.

That's ok they have their own disposable sycophants as well. Milo springs to mind as the minute he deviates from script they can and have just dismissed him retroactively as a degenerate faggot.

Why are you attacking the person that gave you some facts instead of his arguments?

Or right you're libcuck.

>100% sure this dude doesn't have anything unique or interesting to say.
We live in a time where truth and logic are unique and interesting. A sad state of affairs.

>character assassination
SJW detected.

>coming from a place that calls all dissenters cucks
Who would've guessed it was Sup Forums that was the biggest SJW of them all.

Not an argument, cuck. Stay mad, since the facts are, and always will be, on our side.

>>Wanted to see Donald Trump win the republican primary only to flip back to Sanders a few months later
didn't he only want Trump to win the primary because he thought it would mean Sanders was more likely to win?

I remember him saying that in a chat withe secular talk. He said superficial stuff like "I like Trump because he doesn't hold back" and praised him for that. Maybe I didn't catched it back then.

Any video espousing a particular view isn't going to create that reinforcement, It's the public that responds and creates echo-chambers, so in a sense you are right. I find that he is right most of the time but to just sit and say "durr the difference is he is correct" is obviously suspect and a stupid thing to say.

I think a difference is when someone speaks with authority vs. from a honest socratic curiosity. It's the difference between laci green going "this guy raped someone" to presenting a set of facts and then saying "make up your own mind", the moment a person says the first thing, they have crossed into intellectual arrogance and are encouraging the echo camber effect.

But channels like Sargon's usually present some media and take it apart, while linking to the original so you can see it for yourself.

I'd argue the internet has been a great boon for education. The fear in MSG2 of "Drowning in a sea of information" was nonsense. Having information archived is useful, if anything.

>"Drowning in a sea of information"
Not really. Looked at SJW's, they literally spent their time fighting against reality with disinformation on a daily basis.

>DUDE I'M JUST A COMEDIAN LMAO
>IT'S NOT A REAL NEWS SHOW LMAO
When will this stop being considered acceptable?

>Issues are binary
Except when they aren't, which is almost all the time, including the issues you mentioned.

Why do you pretend to have a low IQ on the internet?

When being a victim loses its esteem
>so, never

If Sargon is a liberal I guess that makes Trump a communist

He doesn't need to block comments because he doesn't get raided by Sup Forums and alt-right trolls with too much time on their hands.

Sargon is liberal as fuck. But he's a man, so his bullshit detector goes off just as much as any conservative's/Republican's when he is presented with SJW rhetoric.

>Uses the word 'Feels'
>Makes 'handegg' joke
You're losing me already, faggot.