What do you guys think of polyamory ?

What do you guys think of polyamory ?

I have this date schedule date with those two girls, they are already dating, if this date goes well I might end up in a throuple with those two girls, should I do it ?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=UxpVwBzFAkw
mathconsult.ch/static/unipoly/unipoly.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

if it is what you want yes

one guy with a couple chicks works
the other side is a meme or material for porn

I mean, I wouldn't mind going on a date with either one of them individually, but I'm looking for a serious stable relationship and I don't know if a threeway relationship has the potential to be steady

degeneracy

Because men are too mean to each other ? I mean, I wouldn't date a girl that's already dating another guy, unless it's like, a really girly crossdressing trap twink thing

Polyamoury is my fetish. I'm a bisexual female and my fiance and I have had four threesomes with various female friends. It's the best, being able to share my man with another girl. I'd have liked to try an MMF threesome at some point in my life, but my fiance isn't into men, so I doubt it's going to happen. Oh well.

Well, I meant more of like, sustained relationships more than casual threesomes, I had one a few years back, but it was a one time thing

Ahh... I'd love to find a girl who'd be interested in actually dating us, but it's hard enough just finding a casual bi female fuckbuddy. I hope you make it work!

I'm sure there are places you could look, but the problem for you guys would be that you and your fiance are already well settled and the girl might feel like the fifth wheel

sure, do it

I think that the fact that this is becoming more prevalent though is a sign of society degenerating. it's "harems forming", which is bad per j.d.unwin theory

...

What ?

oh, that's a tetrahedron

Do you mind expanding on that theory user ? I might do my research but if you could just give me a quick explanation that'd be cool

From wiki:
>Unwin's conclusions, which are based upon an enormous wealth of carefully sifted evidence, may be summed up as follows. All human societies are in one or another of four cultural conditions: zoistic, manistic, deistic, rationalistic. Of these societies the zoistic displays the least amount of mental and social energy, the rationalistic the most. Investigation shows that the societies exhibiting the least amount of energy are those where pre-nuptial continence is not imposed and where the opportunities for sexual indulgence after marriage are greatest. The cultural condition of a society rises in exact proportion as it imposes pre-nuptial and post-nuptial restraints upon sexual opportunity.
>According to Unwin, after a nation becomes prosperous it becomes increasingly liberal with regard to sexual morality and as a result loses it cohesion, its impetus and its purpose. The process, says the author, is irreversible:
>The whole of human history does not contain a single instance of a group becoming civilized unless it has been absolutely monogamous, nor is there any example of a group retaining its culture after it has adopted less rigorous customs

That's a triangular prism, though... so, it has 5 points. Just a triangle is the best symbol here.

I got it all off the most popular black pigeon speaks video, though I've tried skimming a bit of the book.

youtube.com/watch?v=UxpVwBzFAkw

I'll paste the summary from wikipedia:

>In Sex and Culture (1934), Unwin studied 80 primitive tribes and 6 known civilizations through 5,000 years of history and found a positive correlation between the cultural achievement of a people and the sexual restraint they observe.[1] "Sex and Culture is a work of the highest importance," Aldous Huxley wrote;

>Unwin's conclusions, which are based upon an enormous wealth of carefully sifted evidence, may be summed up as follows. All human societies are in one or another of four cultural conditions: zoistic, manistic, deistic, rationalistic. Of these societies the zoistic displays the least amount of mental and social energy, the rationalistic the most. Investigation shows that the societies exhibiting the least amount of energy are those where pre-nuptial continence is not imposed and where the opportunities for sexual indulgence after marriage are greatest. The cultural condition of a society rises in exact proportion as it imposes pre-nuptial and post-nuptial restraints upon sexual opportunity.[2]

>According to Unwin, after a nation becomes prosperous it becomes increasingly liberal with regard to sexual morality and as a result loses it cohesion, its impetus and its purpose. The process, says the author, is irreversible:

>The whole of human history does not contain a single instance of a group becoming civilized unless it has been absolutely monogamous, nor is there any example of a group retaining its culture after it has adopted less rigorous customs.

That's not necessarily a bad thing, more liberal views on sexuality might come along with decline but I can't imagine how they could be the decline, moreover, who care's we'll all be dead before the real down fall comes

no, here's an animation.

His theories are interesting, yes, but we now have technology which might be able to stave off the effect of sexual liberty. When Unwin proposed this, we didn't have automation, computers, global communication or transit... we have a better chance at succeeding in creating a sexually liberated civilization than ever before. I think it's worth a try.

That would involve 4 people not three though

Ah, sorry. But it still has 4 points, not 3.

it seems that the more liberal sex views cause an inefficient usage of ''expansive energy" which is better used developing the civilization

oh I didn't mean to represent the situation, I'm just posting geometric shapes

This one's an orgy

However, we can use less and less energy to create innovation in culture and technology in modern times due to computation and globalization. We can do things more efficiently now. I think we can use a little bit of our time to fuck each other.

isn't europe getting dominated by the more sexually repressed muslims right now though? I'm not so sure about the chances

...

look at this perversion

Technically MFF throuple is more energy efficient, since a man can easily breed with two women and this free another man to only work and don't care about sex

This looked like a lot of fun

or, that man, instead of having his sex situation solved and stable, is now spending energy looking for a woman

It's not really being dominated; that's just a xenophobic exaggeration. What we'll actually see in a few generations is a group of less sexually repressed people of Muslim decent.

...

You're ignoring that a lot of men gay anyway, so a bunch of women are "freed up" by this logic.

This is true, unless we can find a way we can tell this man not to bother

I'm sad these don't spin.

that doesn't look like a likely reality at a large enough scale, those 'westernized' muslims are a minority

hehe are you suggesting large scale distribution of libido suppressants or something

Their children will be more westernized than they are. Give it a few generations and we'll eventually see less repression.

We have that; it's called porn.

"a lot" is an overstatement I think.
and I don't get how gay people don't fit my point?

I mean, that would be pretty extreme, but, if we could select a few million genetically superior breeders and castrate the remaining men, it would be much more energy efficient

I have the animations

AW YISS

isn't porn just as much a waste of energy though? idk

Unwind couldn't possibly consider porn in his book though

I found the webpage I saved them all from actually

mathconsult.ch/static/unipoly/unipoly.html

saving images is a stupid pastime but at least it isn't costly (except in hard drive space)

Thanks based user.

But why did you chose this thread to post those instead of telling me if I should go on that date ?

ur welc

well I was just going to post the tetrahedron because it points upward, but then people replied so I put another shape in each reply to them.
hey, at least your thread got bumped! I think you should go on the date.

hm, maybe. if anything it'd still be best if the sex weren't getting so liberated though, those mitigating factors are interesting to consider though. well, we'll all see as time goes on.

I mean, if this relationship works, I won't be crying over the downfall of Europe, as long as I'm happy I don't care what happens after I die

maybe! I'll keep that in mind