What did John see in her? She's pretty ugly and annoying but for him it seemed like she was the best thing ever

What did John see in her? She's pretty ugly and annoying but for him it seemed like she was the best thing ever.

He always talked about how much she understood him. He viewed himself as kind of an artist and kind of an intellectual and saw her reflect those same things

its called being human
john got bored of the same hippie chicks with no brains just trying to fuck him
yoko stimualted his brain

John was a pretentious hack

Yoko isn't a hack but she is pretentious

Natural fit. He latched onto her talent

When you can fuck all the hottest girls in the world you start to get bored of looks and want someone with personality you can relate to.

I can see why he wanted peace because I bet he couldn't get much from her

Kinky sex

She was great in her hot pa ts and tights
Also 'woman is the nigga...' john weren't stupid he knew what he was doing

Mummy issues. Seriously.

Asians have tight pussies

Yoko is beat Beatle.

she was the only woman his tiny dick could satisfy

he was on the old "drugs" as they say

Most likely he fell in love with her for the same reasons that most people fall in love for. I think people for generations have just criticized their relationship for not seeming like a good fit or whatever, though it seemed like an excellent fit in reality.

>he judges the relationship between the two and how much of a fit they were from watching interviews
lmao

Black magic by that slope witch + John's weak faggot British-style fuck-my-wife-Ahmed will power.

Faggot are you such a pussy you can't write the word NIGGER?

He was a weabo

The fact that so many books still name the Beatles as “the greatest or most significant or most influential” rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success. The Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worthy of being saved.

>her

seriously one of the shittiest couples ever seen

if i was Lennon i will just fucking 12 years old as he did...

George got all the good girls. Until he got cucked by Clapton.

It's simple. If it's from 20+ years ago and still available now, then it must be good stuff. Sure the Beatles sold a lot but their music is still around. Same for Beethoven, Coltrane and Duke Ellington. There's probably people who sold a lot and nobody remembers them now. I don't care what the critics say.

I do the same with books. I won't read anything less than 20 years old. If it's that old and still around then it's good enough for me.

That's ancient copypasta you're replying to, gets posted in every single Beatles thread we've ever had on Sup Forums. You're not supposed to take it seriously.

Poor George.