Yesterday proved that no matter what lies the republicans throw at her, they just won't stick

Yesterday proved that no matter what lies the republicans throw at her, they just won't stick.

Hillary was cleared of all wrong doing by the FBI yesterday, regardless of a years-old probe started by the GOP.

First it was Benghazi, then it was the alleged email scandal. She was cleared in both, and the GOP literally has nothing else left to throw at her.

He republicans: How about instead of your usual dirty politics, you actually try to take a stance on some real issues that actually matter to people. Not dumb shit like "hurr: wall" that A) can't be done, and B) is just stupid.

Other urls found in this thread:

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793#.ViBujn6rSUk
youtube.com/watch?v=iid4cgR4xVE
youtube.com/watch?v=itmNiTwHOsM
donaldjtrump.com/positions/tax-reform
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

...

Dirty politics is the only kind of politics that Republicans now.

They can't win on issues alone, so that is why they do it.

Good troll, you do realize she wasn't cleared right? They literally just said "well we confirmed these are all the illegal things she did, we just don't care enough to go after her". Not a republican but saying she was "cleared of all wrong doing" and that everything was lies is just ignorant. Just means that the U.S. government and justice system doesn't actually work anymore.

>national review
>credible news source

pick only one.

You know what this does actually? It sets a precedent. Now anyone who fucks up as bad as she did, they can't be held accountable for it, unless the FBI wants to back track and actually indict her. Her negligence was all that was required for prison time or a fine. It's in their fucking guidelines.

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793#.ViBujn6rSUk

fbi didn't actually clear her. They suggested no charges, but they don't get to make that decision.

Saying "she did this, this, and this" without a proper indictment or court which allows her to defend herself, doesn't make the claims valid.

Innocent until PROVEN guilty. So far there is no real proof, or they would have recommended prosecuting her.

statute of limitations on this stuff is only 5 years, so it would have to happen within the next 5 years in order for them to go back and indict her.

Loretta Lynch already said that "I will go with the FBI's recommendation".

Basically, they said a precursor would have a hard time actually getting a conviction, so they didn't recommend wasting time. They admitted what she did was wrong.

Right, but my point is more on the precedent they set by not indicting her.

But that's just it. They can't validly make that claim without giving her, her day in court.

German fag here. This whole incident makes the U.S. justice system look very bad to the entire world.

OP is proof that it is easier to find a nigger with a job then it is to find a millennial with a brain.

do a little research before starting a bait thread summer friend.

What part of "what she did was wrong" says "she didn't actually do anything wrong"?

And this post proves that hard core Democrats can justify anything, no matter how reprehensible it is.

I'll tell you this plain: I don't believe in trump or his wall. But I won't vote Democrat and I won't support liberal causes no matter how much you morons rage and froth at the mouth.

BEngazi was no lie you fucking retard. GOOD people died because of these democraps. I hope she rots in hell and all you liberal fuck tards that believe your doing any good aside from lining the elite douch bags pockets. Seriously you love paying for niggers to have babies and protect those that have no tolerance for anything but whining on the internets. Shut up and listen when people talk you will better understand the world instead of spewing out your democratic garbage all over the place. ALSO fact check before you think you know something. Truth is you probably don't.

That's why the director of the FBI said what she did was basically extremely careless. Basically the FBI wanted to do something but with Obama backing Hillary they had to bite their tongues and couldn't say what they really wanted to say. Democrats are the kings of corruption.

Is it any surprise that the hilldawg shills are out big today?

ALSO the GOP has plenty to throw at her and anyone else wanting to run considering that it makes up about 65% of the electoral college right now.

AND how is that Charlie Rangal working out for you folks...?

Amerifag here....

In the immortal words of Walter White:

You're goddamn right.


This basically says that the Clintons are above the law, and basically proves that they will be back in the white house regardless of voter turnout.

TRUMP TRAIN!!!! OBAMA WERE GONNA BUILD THAT WALL!!!!

Dude, he has been shilling/trolling for the past few hours; all he can say is "innocent until prove guilty" over and over despite the fbi director even saying if this was anyone else they would be charged.

>there is no real proof, or they would have recommended prosecuting her.

Being this naive and incorrect.

Actually they matter of factly stated that she lied to the FBI and everyone else about almost everything. And that she did both recieve and send email with classified caviats including Top Secret.

She has committed both perjury and violation of federal law regarding handling of classified information and she's not even trying to lie about it anymore. She's just saying "Oh, my bad... Whoops."

The rigged system works. Just not for you... Welcome to the Clinton third world corruption olympics.

sure kid. always play the victim

sure kid

agreed. i really would like to hear some specific details from trump on what he wants to do. there have been none so far.

it's true and in the past it has worked for them. they need to adapt to the new age. the internet is fucking up their old ways of doing shit. they need to adapt or die off.

This. OP is a fag and should find the basement door and get some sun.

Well placed bait OP

I know. I hate that this country has turned into career politicians ruling everything. I might just take my family and gtfo....

>Loretta Lynch already said that "I will go with the FBI's recommendation".

The fix was in before that. Obviously she was safe in saying that because there was no risk of the FBI indicting Clinton while democrats are in control.

Welcome to third world America. Almost as if everything that conservatives said about blacks running things came true.

Enjoying the circlejerk?

right, right...

youtube.com/watch?v=iid4cgR4xVE

>what lies the republicans throw at her, they just won't stick.
>Republicans=FBI
This demonstrates corruption, it doesn't prove that a group having nothing to do with it is lying tardo
I'm a Democrat. Don't you find the tarmac social visit and the FBI suddenly going lukewarm pussy on us a bit strange?

reagan killed 300 people after 60 were killed IN THE SAME PLACE a month before. fuck you. people die all the time. it happens. get the fuck over it and stop using it for political purposes. those were real human beings, not pegs to be used in some shit game.

Lol, he hasn't put out details?

He's put out just as many specific details as hillary has.

i didn't watch this but who cares what some fatty thinks

youtube.com/watch?v=itmNiTwHOsM

I HHHHHHHHHHHHHHillaryAMMMMMM THE LAWWWWWW

Only if he's in the middle.

How much do they pay you to shill like this?

Fucking republicans and liberals.
Fucking up the whole damn country with your stupidity.
Trump is a retard who isn't addresing america's problems.
Hillary is a bitch who isn't addressing america's problems.

Tried to confirm statute of limitations for Washington D.C.:

>its not 5 years
>its 3

Which just makes it worse. All of our politicians can't be touched 3 years after they break the law while the rest of us can be charged up to 10 years after we commit a crime.

This. Republicans very, very bad.

Democrats good.

>proof only exists when a judge confirms it
So gravity also isn't something we should be sure about? They said she was neglectful, and a national leader ignoring everything from her classified training is illegal whether they pursue it or not you tard

not at all. he has zero details about what he actually intends to do. build a wall, ok, but that's it. better trade deals? with who exactly? what will these new deals look like? shit like that is so vague it only appeals to idiots like you.

>not charged
>cleared of any wrongdoing
That you think these are the same thing is why you are what's wrong with this country.
Try to think for yourself.

No where to go man. Sorry to say.

>Don't you find the tarmac social visit and the FBI suddenly going lukewarm pussy on us a bit strange?

The Democrats have been working on America becoming a third world banana republic for my entire lifetime, why would they suddenly find the spine to enforce an implicitly white concept like rule of law?

This is the real appeal of Trump, he forces everyone involved to throw back the curtain and expose who they really are.

the statute of limitations vary from state to state, genius.

They said she was guilty of recklessly handling classified information. Fuck, for all we know it could have been the lunch schedule for thr pentagon. Of course they dont want us to know we are paying for their 5 star meals. Niggas be tearing shit up if that were the case

ramblings of an idiot

Yeah. That's probably what Bill's tarmac visit was about
>Now don't you sweat longtime friend, you won't have to do anything

Have a read here champ.

donaldjtrump.com/positions/tax-reform

This is just tax reform, but it's pretty detailed. You can find his plans for other shit at the bottom of the page.

Of course she was cleared, she got rid of all the evidence. Cant convict someone that big w/o evidence.

Compelling. Informative. Creative. You must work for NPR.

>Tried to look up the statute of limitations for each state
>which told me that its 3 years for the district of colombia
>and up to 10 years in other states by contrast

Jesus christ, it's like you didn't even read the post. But I know you can't be THAT autistic. Or maybe that's just wishful thinking.

>faggot

i've seen it. there are no details there

presidents don't set taxes fool. at best it can be considered what trump would like to see, not what he intends to do.

Federal law.

$

>Fuck, for all we know it could have been the lunch schedule for thr pentagon.

Her emails (Including the ones marked classified) are on wikileaks. They are actual emails dealing with relations with foreign countries and military decisions that display the intent and direction of one of the highest offices in the country.

Reckless is putting it mildly. Utterly incompetent and belligerent about it is more accurate.

She has lost the opportunity to say anything about Trump being a national security risk, she was practically handing over her personal correspondence as Secretary of State to other countries intelligence services.

for what crime? every crime is different. what crime are you talking abuot?

the fact that i even have to ask this question means you're an idiot.

Sure kid.

How many threads are you gonna copy/pasta that reply in?

This doesn't surprise me.

They fuck a lot of escorts and buy a lot of cocaine there

But they set proposals. You should just stop.

>presidents don't set taxes fool
This.

Its not like Bush did things that got people iled, right?

His making Brown the FEMA head certainly got people in the 9th ward killed, not just people who were already in a risky overseas posting

see
section (f)

...

It makes sense when you actually look at it. Democrats are going to use this in the future as evidence that the system is rigged at the highest levels in favor of the politically connected and wealthy. And so is Trump.

People who continue to support Clinton are literally supporting someone whose political machine operates outside the rule of law and with dictatorial aplomb. Well the gig is up now, the curtain has been pulled back and America is no longer a country under the rule of law.

You won leftists, we Brazil now.

In 2008, almost 80% of the white house admitted to using cocaine in the past 5 years.

The part where she didn't INTENTIONALLY gave away Top Secret info.

Yeah, I thought you'd say that. But I'll bet that Hillary's page, whom I'm sure you support and will vote for, has no more detail.

Perhaps you can enlighten the board what details your interested in?

>Yesterday proved that no matter what lies the republicans throw at her, they just won't stick.
What we know is that Hillary is an unindicted criminal who broke the espionage laws and got away with it. Failure to prosecute does not mean she's innocent.

how can "the rest of us" ever be involved in that crime? man you're a fucking idiot.

here's the key section fag lord:

"with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States..."

with intent or reason to believe.

the FBI has concluded she did NOT act with that belief or intent.

the end

There is no law for intent. Just negligence. Again, see

>so is Trump

I can guarantee it that if it were Trump facing these same charges, he would be sitting in jail today. Hillary and Bill are so heavily politically connected in DC, that they basically get whatever they want.

>This is the real appeal of Trump, he forces everyone involved to throw back the curtain and expose who they really are.
Not at all. Dems and Reps are stonewalling him together. He hasn't exposed anything. If he did care he would be supporting wikileaks, hiring investigators to track corruption across states and departments from every party, and his lawyers would be promoting pro-rights, pro-citizen class action lawsuits. He's just new money the establishment finds irritating, as do most people. He doesn't care but you think he does, and that's what's wrong with both pro-Trumpers and pro-Shillers

Oh, i'm sorry i ran over your child. It wasn't my intention
Oh, i'm sorry your kid put a knife in the toaster, it wasn't my intention.
Oh i'm sorry i left the gas on and burnt your house down, it wasn't my intention.
Oh i'm sorry downloaded 30 terrabytes of porn on your computer, it wasn't my intention.

i already asked for them. instead, knowing, i suppose, that you coudn't find any, you gave me some nonsense tax shit instead.

Intent a factor.

Nah man they're both bad, Trump might even be slightly worse too.

Dude fuck you racist bitch. As if whities dont abuse the same welfare system. You are no better than the "libtards" you try to bash. Your lord and savior complimented Sadam. The same fucking prick that had no WMDs and wasnt funding al quida. Yet another republican falsely accused and waged war upon wasting tax payers dollars. "But obama raised the debt two fold." Well thays kind of easy to do when half the fucking debt is already there from that retard Bush. Id rather line the pockets of the greedy jews at a chance ill get something back than to watch some racist, pompous, hypocritcal piece of white trash run start the next world war and watch the country fucking burn. Fuck republicans

Proof that she INTENTIONALLY gave TS's away?

>oh you don't have any

trump would have to be involved int he goverment somehow to lose or gather or transmit defense information.

he's not.

no one woudl hire the guy. his only possibility having access to this stuff is if he gets elected by idiots like you.

which thankfully looks to be a long shot

It's not even a conspiracy you dumb faggot. Intern or work at a political or government position when you're old enough and you'll probably learn a lot of basic political manuverng. Your grandmother could tell you this basic shit

Nearly 30 years of political insider of course this fucking bitch is going to be protected by insiders. Election is going to be rigged by electoral college again, Hillary won't actually win the popular vote come the end of the summer, but she will probably still get in office, because we know she's being protected.

What's your goal here, faggot? What are you even fighting for?

>shitposting for the sake of shitposting
>not that user but jesus christ your posts are a shitshow

The statute doesn't say anything about intent, but does say "gross negligence", which the FBI directory basically said that she was "Extremely Careless" is the same thing legally by definition.

Intent isn't a factor in the law.

she wasnt cleared, it was recomended not to prosecute her. why? either because she is female, or it looks bad trying to charge a presidential candidate.
I hate to say it, but if privilege exists, hilary has a whole hell of alot of it

i'm just showing you the key points of the thing YOU told me to look at.

you can't deal with facts i guess.

fuck off then

>NOT THAT user

Oh okay, I get it. You legitimately can't read.

How is that even a conspiracy? It's basic legal ethics. Would a defendant's husband meet with a judge or investigator before the trial 'for a social visit'?

No one's playing the victim. We're laughing at failed disingenuous Republican efforts to fuck Clinton. Republicans don't give a rat's ass about email security breaches or disclosure of confidential information. The only motivation for this costly bullshit was to fuck Hillary Clinton, nothing else. It was the same with Benghazi, which involved not even a whiff of wrongdoing on Clinton's part. It's fun to watch you guys unravel over your constant failures. You always seem so surprised.

aww, somebody need a diaper change?
nice non comparison shit for brains.

Intent isn't a factor in the law.

i just don't believe your bullshit, that's all. you were found out and you're trying to backpedal.

Under normal circumstances probably not, but when he knows her, and worked with her, then certainly.