How the fuck is 3d loli not illegal? Its basically CP

How the fuck is 3d loli not illegal? Its basically CP.

Other urls found in this thread:

avclub.com/article/man-faces-10-years-in-prison-for-downloading-emsim-46424
telegram.me/joinchat/CJk62gc2QxLcvBmf1EId7w
youtube.com/watch?v=0DcdXA3FOf8
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

It's fucking disgusting

Because you don't have to rape a kid to make it. Use your brain it's simple shit man.

Because muh freedoms

It is.

It's fucking gross, seeing it on the Sup Forums makes me want to switch back to using reddit

>it's not hurting anyone so it's okay

Great logic pedophile.

>the only reason child pornography is illegal is because it involves rape
Where did you get this idea?

Whoa, lets not say anything we cant take back, here

muh freedoms
muh sexual liberation
muh pedophobia

stop persecuting us

So you see my point good

Wouldnt it be THEIR pedophobia?

Don't you see? It makes kids safer. Spreading pedophilic urges and giving pedophiles a place to communicate with eachother and develop their fantasies makes kids safer.

...

...

...

I see you kidnapping children in twenty years when neckbearding gets boring and you feel like you wanna cash in that Wizard card.

...

How is a picture of a man punching another man not illegal?

>i'd take hitler over fucks like this

If simpsons porn is illegal, then so is this.

avclub.com/article/man-faces-10-years-in-prison-for-downloading-emsim-46424

If you know anyone who downloads this shit, you have an obligation to report them.
/thread

too many memes for me bro

no it's illegal like it should be because you have to hurt kids to make it other wise you only reason is eww and if that is the standard then why not just ban everything that 51% or more of the country thinks is gross like let's saying being rasict

That's false equivalency.

How the fuck are first person shooters not illegal? Its basically murder.

It is. It's just not enforced much. FBI wont come breaking down your door over it but they will add it to charges if you are caught with real CP.

>inb4 someone cites the 90s law being repealed but ignores the 2000s law that is still in effect

>evades

Kek

ugh nazis were just triggered SJWs because anybody who doesn't approve of pedophilia is an SJW am I right guys?

>911 never forgetti :(

I'm not even that dude, go win your internet argument somewhere else mr 12 year old

>it's not hurting anyone so it's okay

Yes, that's called the Harm Principle made famous by the philosopher John Stuart Mill.

It is indeed great fucking logic.

No, it's not.

because no children were raped in the process of making it.

Not every pedophile rapes children, just like not every heterosexual male rapes women. You're an idiot, I presume that's why he didn't give you a good reply.

>not every pedophile rapes children, just like not every heterosexual male rapes women
YOU FUCKING CANCER FAGGOT, GET AIDS! Dirty cunt faggot, allow me to crush your faggot argument.
When a functioning adult woman goes and gets drunk off her titties in a tight ass dress and passes out on the sidewalk, she ACTIVLEY INCREASED HER CHANCERS, BY HERSELF, HER OWN FUCKING FAULT OF GETTING RAPED. Pedo's are called predators for a fucking reason fag, the go out of their way to lure kids in and or kidnap them without the kids even realizing it because THEIR JUST FUCKING KIDS! Pedo filth. I spit on thee.

There is literally nothing wrong with raping children.

If its basically CP then watch me get banned

And you ask this to people that think liking women with cocks isn't gay?

>Pedo's are called predators for a fucking reason
No, that's child molesters you're thinking of, which I just said that not all pedophiles are. Thanks for the straw man though.

telegram.me/joinchat/CJk62gc2QxLcvBmf1EId7w

Do not join

Kek

A++++++++++++++++ fast delivery would click links from again

What now OP

There's no such thing as women with cocks. Just men with tits.

>i can get a gf my own age, better fap to kids like the man i am

No, there's no such thing as a female with a cock.

Girls and women can have cocks.

>men with tits
aka everyone on Sup Forums

I'm thinking man

can i squeeze yours?

I'm a nerd at college, I care more about making sure I don't end up a minimum wage making loser than I do about getting pussy. Eat shit

>posting on Sup Forums
>pretending he could get a girlfriend.

That's fucking rich user.

Chu-check

and we care because...

...

my moobs bring all the boys to that yard (then they puke)

You can get a gf and go to college at the same time... granted you dont spend a shit ton on said gf but thats besides the point

VERY thinly disguised request for 3d loli porn... tsk tsk. man up and just ask for it.

>people who hate pedos are white knights
How's summer?

Youtubers still want to lure you to their shitty site isn't it?, ho Sup Forums when will you learn?

Hedonism is one of the stupidest fucking philosophers any rich cunt has ever spouted out of his mouth, and he would never have said that shit if he had to farm his own fucking food or any of the other dozens of tasks that peasants did for him.

Sauce on that

Its already been posted idiot, theres loli threads every other day too. So nah.

If anything, he probably wants CP. But I doubt anyone has the stones to post it(nudge nudge wink wink)

Not 3d loli boi

I DARE someone to post some

It's a moral stance, not a logical one. I personally don't see anything wrong with the principle.

>Great logic
Well, yeah. That IS great logic, actually.

...

Is it?

Satan pls. We all know that when he feels like doing that we'll have the technology for him to fuck a virtual loli.

So let's have the source

Let's have the sauce

>He made a good point, but I can't think of any legitimate rebuttal so I'll just call him names in all caps.

That's like calling all people who have thought about killing someone a murderer??

Children can't be illegal, OP.

that is great logic tho

Still
Waiting user

Pedophiles ITT:
>hurr durr persecuted by thought crime
>downloads, spams, and consistently jerks off to cartoon images of porn
>sometimes draw it
>those actions are all thoughts apparently
Man furries are smarter than you perverts

The cartoons don't hurt anybody. The idea is that we fantasize about fucking children, but that is not equivalent to actually fucking children.

Author Neil Gaiman had one of the best responses to the 2008 case, saying that the court had “just inadvertently granted human rights to cartoon characters,” and that “the ability to distinguish between fiction and reality is, I think, an important indicator of sanity, perhaps the most important.

The NSA and FBI is watching you now you tard. Your life is fucking rekt'd m8
>asking for CP on such a well-known site

Fantasizing can lead to action though

because they aren't real people, there are no victims

>comparing video games to animated cp

Animated murder to animated child nudity.

>cartoons don't hurt anybod
You perverts spam it in every thread. Don't play coy, even the autistics on Sup Forums don't like it.

How the fuck is playing counter-strike not illegal? Its basically murder

Don't have the damn sauce, I'm just someone who desperately saves any western 3d loli he can since its objectively superior to anime 3d loli

It is illegal in Canada. It shouldn't be, since it harms no one, but that's the scoop.

It's okay, I promise to pay a million bucks in damages to every victim of my 3d loli consumption.

see
Thoughts do not always lead to action, in fact they rarely do in cases like this. I'm guessing that most people who molest children would have done so regardless of the existence of loli. I have morals. Just because I like children does not mean I would rape one.

It hurt OP

You know, I think that...

...

Meant for

So playing games where you kill people can lead to killing people in life, better make video games illegal. Great logic.

youtube.com/watch?v=0DcdXA3FOf8

What's the difference? Do you have evidence that one's more harmful than the other?

>what is malum prohibitum