What went wrong?

What went wrong?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Kjq-yL80v-A
youtube.com/watch?v=vMJjqVB9JCM
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

He hasn't put out a decent release since Rough Sleeper

He started transitioning

nothing, i like it, certainly better than rival dealer

He has spent more time playing videogames rather than making music.

It was actually pretty good.

nah man it's sick

wish he'd fucking tone it down with the vinyl sound effects tho

n-no bully

>this shit taste

Burial was never good

yeehaw

lmao burial is a rockists wet dream u pard

Woah, is that him?

nothing, it's a solid release

its so bland tho

Dark Souls 2

all electronic is bland dipshit

>4/4 every song xD just dance man, it's dance music!!!

yeah, fuck off

beito desu

>random reverby pitch-shifted female vocals sampled from fuck knows where
>warm vinyl crackle and pop sounds
>a few subdued and inconsistent drum patterns that could have been programmed by a fucking toddler
>maybe some sounds taken from a video game


every Burial track, tada

This

>liking rival dealer

Rival Dealer disagrees

wait what?

>not appreciating burial's coming out

Nightmarket is fucking amazing. Young Death not so much.

>all electronic music is bland /bleep/-core or EDM

/bleep/-core is better than this shite

youtube.com/watch?v=Kjq-yL80v-A
youtube.com/watch?v=vMJjqVB9JCM

BURIALFAGS WILL DEFEND THIS

Aren't you just defending Rabit by posting his song? They both sampled the same thing, big deal.
And you're just ignoring the ambience and subtle drums during that part in nightmarket.

I will admit it is lazy sampling, but it isn't as bad as people are making it out to be.

6.9

B T F O

>Pitchfork finally pans him.

I agreed with Kindred and everything before being 8.0+, but Truant was a mid 7, Rival Dealer a 5, and this in all honesty, probably a high 4.

Who cares about P4K, what will RA say?

>Truant was a mid 7
nah

Well they gave the Temple Sleeper a 2.3/5, but Rival Dealer a 4.0/5, so who really knows. But I have a feeling that, being so heavily dance-oriented, they're going to pan the shit out of this one.

eh, ra doesn't actually show much favoritism towards more dance-heavy material. most of their ra recommends have been more "experimental" "home-listening" "post-club" shit. i blame ryce t bh.

yeah but this is all just ambient bollocks sampling-rabit-sampling-vidya soundtracks nonsense

they live for that shit tho. like i thought that new crampton was just some half-assed sample collage but nah, they - and seemingly every other critic - were salivating over it cus of some half assed and heavily projected social commentary or w/e.

Explain this meme.

>Truant was a mid 7

the fuck

yes

I actually like this more than Archangel

That is possibly the biggest lie I've heard and I do not believe you

>suddenly trendy to shit on burial's discog because of "le edm bogeyman"

you sad lot

>suddenly

if you think archangel is really all that special, you're such a pleb.

literally every track on untrue is better than that, plus Nightmarket > Archangel. easily.

was meant for

new crampton was good tho

there is literally nothing wrong with it you bitchbois

>a commodore song with vinyl crackles is better than the most influential dubstep song of the second half of the 2000's
I don't even know how to respond to this

>Burial
>dubstep
wat. there have always been garage tunes like archangel. I mean, sure, it's unique, but so is the rest of untrue. I'd pick homeless over archangel any day