>Musical taste is subjective
>Therefore nobody actually has good or shit tastes
Music snobs BTFO
>Musical taste is subjective
>Therefore nobody actually has good or shit tastes
Music snobs BTFO
shut up, fag
not really
there is a difference between "truth" and "meaning"
>there is a difference between "truth" and "meaning"
tell me more user
What the hell are you talking about?
It is my opinion that tame impala is pleb shit
Music snobs irl have vastly different taste than the ironic shitposters on Sup Forums
and it's better
your opinion is correct, op's isn't
>opinion
>correct
subjectivity is for plebs who eat feces and say "well i don't like it but someone else might." or they hear someone else talking about how amazing the feces is and eat the feces with great enthusiasm because they're fucking idiots.
all the music snobs I know irl are dad rockers, think starterpack shoegaze is obscure, or are snotty goths who think Peter Murphy is the pinnacle of post-punk.
so, I prefer the shitposting here.
>Musical taste is subjective
This is what plebeians really believe.
ok
truth is the solitary and unshakable fact of something. truth is unmoving and static. When you say "this music is the best, that's the truth" and other people submit to it, there can be no change or deviation or anything beyond it.
meaning, however, is something that is always growing. it is always up for interpretation and always able to reach new and different heights. But it is not something that is based in truth, rather something that is based in its own internal logic. It is not something entirely subjective as in "well that's just your opinion" because you can use the work to show that it accomplishes well what it needs to accomplish or not. It has its own set of rules that are not definite but contigent.
sry I'm drunk
that seems reasonable
I'm glad you clarified that you're drunk. This pseudo-intellectual nonsense.
well if you want to read more, I'd recommend stuff by Roland Barthes or Nietzsche or other poststructuralist stuff. Carry on my wayward son. There will be peace when you are done.
what's your argument? how do you prove to me that the feces are feces? you're just saying that people are driven to things other people like
there is nothing more pseudo intellectual than ruling something as pseudo intellectual without rebutting it
all you're saying is "I'm smarter than you"
I think none of that applies to art tho
>subjective
I'm not sure we both have the same understanding of what that word means, because you're basically describing Sup Forums, and Sup Forums's opinions are extremely objective. The hive mind is strong on this website, and a lot of the tastes here are fucking strange. It's literally consensus; nobody would be talking about these albums if people weren't masturbating to them.
No opinion is completely objective or subjective. If you always listened to the crowd, how would you find yourself? If you never listened to the crowd, how could you understand where you set your par of quality?
>I think none of that applies to art tho
Pls explain more.
i can't prove it to you. if your senses are dulled to the point that you can't recognize feces i'd simply laugh at your enthusiastic shit-eating face.
who said the mu hivemind was objective. it's no different from any other instance of people getting together and creating some vague code for what's good or bad.
>No opinion is completely objective or subjective.
some opinions are better than others. if you can't recognize this then that's unfortunate.
>If you always listened to the crowd, how would you find yourself? If you never listened to the crowd, how could you understand where you set your par of quality?
you listen to the music you fucking dolt.
Pseudo science is completely worthless in every context user, especially when it comes to music,. If you can't determine if something is objectively good or not, there is no point in trying by any other means, you are literally wasting your time and making yourself look like a moron.
>it's not science
the calling card of the Platonist cuck
I'm sorry astrology isn't real user
Nothing is subjective, everything is objective