I'm sorry, but I might not be a "jazz expert".
But explain to me how anything by Kennmy G isn't different from Kind Of Blue
>Muh atmosphere
Omg it sounds like I'm walking in the middle of the night. Doesn't make it different from the rest of other generic jazz albums
>Muh influence
Just because it influence countless other boring Starbucks-core album doesn't mean it's any better. Jazz fans treat Kenny G as a joke yet will probably kill anybody who dare even dislikes Kind Of Blue.
Both are the same boring generic music to be played at speakers in your Barns & Nobel.
If I wanted some deep jazz music. I'll just go to Coltrane, Sanders, Ayler, brotzmenn, sun Ra, or even just other miles Davis records.
Miles and Kenny G
do you actually want people to explain it to you or you just wanted to post your opinions
Idk faggot.
I'm gonna take a wild guess and say you're either trolling or don't understand music theory much
kind of blue is boring as fuck but that was a stupid way of saying it
how the fuck is music theory relevant to his enjoyment of the music? no one listens to music and thinks "hm, very nice use of a diminished 7th" or some shit like that because it's not the 16th century anymore
quality bait, pretty irritating person
i'm not going to explain it to you
music theory doesnt matter though listen to their fucking solos idiot
I only mentioned music theory cause that's how it's different (and better) than Kenny G, but yeah I don't feel like explaining it either. Just google modal jazz, OP. It's a much different way of playing jazz that Kind of Blue basically pioneered.
What a waste of quads on such a poop opinion
QUADS CONFIRM KIND OF BLUE IS KIND OF SHIT