/comp/ Composition General

>people other than me this past week have been trying to revive it too

prev An experiment in a pen-and-paper composing general, made for all the theory autists

Post with the intent on discussing composition. And remember, this is NOT /classical/. Any music, such as jazz, is acceptable.

Post clyps and accompanying notation so we can accurately critique your composing from a theory perspective

THEORY
>Fux's Counterpoint
opus28.co.uk/Fux_Gradus.pdf

>Orchestration (Rimsky-Korsakov)
northernsounds.com/forum/forumdisplay.php/77-Principles-of-Orchestration

>Teoria - Music Theory General Guides/Articles/Excercises
teoria.com/index.php

>Arnold Schoenberg's "Fundamentals of Music Composition"
monoskop.org/images/d/da/Schoenberg_Arnold_Fundamentals_of_Musical_Composition_no_OCR.pdf

>20th century music by Stefan Kostka
dmu.uem.br/aulas/analise/Kostka_MaterialsTechniquesXXCenturyMusic.pdf

>Jazz harmony (from the course at Berklee)
davidvaldez.blogspot.com/2006/04/berklee-jazz-harmony-1-4.html

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

>Basic composing
youtube.com/watch?v=hWbH1bhQZSw

>Free Notation Software
musescore.org/

IMPROVISATION

>Fake books for jazz and blues soloing
drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BzW9o5O35hQzMzA0ZmI0MWEtZGFmNi00OTQ0LWI2MjMtOWUyNzgyNmUzNzNm&usp=drive_web&ddrp=1&hl=en#

STUFF /COMP/ DOES

>the /comp/ YouTube channel
youtube.com/channel/UCqUEaKts92UIstFjrz9BfcA

>the /comp/ challenge
[email protected]

>/comp/ Google Drive folder
drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/0B8L6-YOBO_NIOXk1OXRsTDlWMHc

Other urls found in this thread:

clyp.it/uu3ewwcv
onlinesequencer.net/361107
clyp.it/wkmbpqmn
scribd.com/document/326921161/Viola-Partita
onlinesequencer.net/361135
clyp.it/z5bbsbeo
youtube.com/watch?v=yCX1Ze3OcKo
clyp.it/doirsjjb
xenharmonic.wikispaces.com/
clyp.it/afi4wt1z
youtu.be/geER3iQDO5k?t=71
clyp.it/fnvokcbt
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Le saved face

bump

clyp.it/uu3ewwcv

thoughts on this canon?

someone tell me what this is!!!!

onlinesequencer.net/361107

It's pretty fun senpai but it could use some extension and perhaps a clearer canon. It did not feel like a canon and more like a short SATB arrangement.

got my viola partita recorded properly the other day:

clyp.it/wkmbpqmn

Score:
scribd.com/document/326921161/Viola-Partita

Can't help you here senpai. Did you put this together? What else can we use to try and know what it is that you're looking for.

Its from some string quartet and yes I sequenced it. the playback can be laggy though. Its a shitty site.

How's this guys - onlinesequencer.net/361135

Hey /comp/, done with my piano sonata, anybody remember my post

post it, loved the first mvmt. You're the A minor sonata guy right?

yup, gonna post a clyp then

clyp.it/z5bbsbeo

Here it is, my complete sonata in A minor

Hope you like it, feedback would be much appreciated

bad.

Although a lot of it is the laggy media

Can you play this? The sonata is pretty well composed and put together. Well done my friend.

I can't. I can imagine that it would be very challenging and not very ''practical'' on the fingers.

Thank you, it means a lot user

Well that's great, and always make sure you express yourself, but remember that the #1 job of the working composer is the feasibility of their music. If it's impossible to play or reproduce - no one will do it.

I disagree. By now with increasingly sophisticated methods we can render something more or less fully acoustic sounding with technology and no need for human players. For mere hobbyists this is a godsend that past composition enthusiasts who never had inroads into the system could only dream of. ergonomics of performance are a relic from the past desu.

That's not what I mean. Compositions are still being performed. This is the primary way in which a composition survives and which a composer seeks (to have his music listened to). Recordings do exist and allow an exact replication of the music every time, but I do think that at the heart of it all lies the performance. This is still the main blood of classical music. No one listens to recorded music live more than once.

This user does have a point. Very few musicians, especially composers, get noticed by releasing recordings. Small time gigs and shows are how most bands start out, and university performances and the like are how composers start out nowadays.

I am saying that most people who will take an interest in composition will never see their music performed anyway and moreover they should be okay with it because the real reward is in the thrill of the hunt in rendering an external simulacrum.

Actually I would argue otherwise. I think most composers /do/ have their pieces performed, or they perform them themselves. If you seek it, it will come. I don't disagree that one should compose for the sake of it, but you must understand that when the will is strong enough, performance is the next logical step. Besides, it's incredibly fun.

yeah most "composers" do. Not most hobbyists or casual enthusiasts. I dont become designated as an artist if I start drawing mangos.

There are communities online you can ask, and fellow hobbyist instrumentalists do like new shit to play.

>I can imagine that it would be very challenging and not very ''practical'' on the fingers.
Of course, you choose the hardest key to play in and the easiest to compose in. Sasuga, Sup Forums.
...but, I guess it's pretty nice; good job following through and finishing it.

>hardest key to play
How is A minor hard to play on the piano? It's probably the easiest key together with C major, having no black keys.

Am I missing something?

>Stuck figuring out how to move into the next part of my piece
The hard part is that I wasn't following any particular rules so I'm going by very loose guidelines. And now I can't figure out how to continue the fucking piece.

Can you post the full score? A link to musescore or whatever.

The black keys make for much much much easier targets -- it's not even a contest; C major/a minor is the hardest key to play high level pieces in by far.

> play high level pieces in by far.
That may be why I don't see it. I'm intermediate at best, and C/a are the easiest for me.

Well done, this is very good. I was in a cynical mood and hoped it'd be shit to make myself feel better, but I enjoyed the piece a lot. Keep up the good work. Do you have formal training? What program do you use to compose?

Basically, when you're playing runs so quick they must be done by muscle memory, your hands can more easily tell where they are subconsciously if they have memorable shapes like the black keys to tell them where to go.

Bumping one last time before bed.

Does anyone else use Finale Songwriter? I've been using it for years. Anyway I tried discussing Finale in /prod/ and was told to go here.

Redpill me on Finale. I've been using soundfonts but I don't know if Ableton is a good next step to make more professional sounds, or what?

Finale is fucking buggy as shit, and the latest one inexplicably auto-deletes its autosaves seven seconds after crashing.

That said, so long as you make sure to save very often, it's very good at creating quality scores, it's quicker than jotting down ideas on paper once you've mastered speedy entry, and the Human Playback, once you've learned what little details make it tick, is just out of this world. I mean it has options like Baroque, Romantic, Jazz, Latin etc. Of course, it's no substitute for actual instruments, no scorewriting program is.

has anyone used masterclass before?

i just saw this today.

youtube.com/watch?v=yCX1Ze3OcKo

some improvs. if someone could tell me where i'm at or what i should work on that would be good. i'm kind of in a vacuum regarding where i'm currently at or if i should continue this. i thought about pursuing some kind of musical education but i have no idea where to start.

clyp.it/doirsjjb

wouldn't be out of place in a god speed you black emperor track with some old recording of some guy talking about dying crops playing over it.

>clyp.it/doirsjjb
Your ideas are all over the place.
>french impressionism
>americana with a touch of jazz
>reminds me of chopin/early scriabin
>almost a continuous of the above but with more french influence
>anime/video game sound track
>anime soundtrack with a touch of jazz
>jazzy -- weird
>slow jam
>classical
>scriabin (late)
>boring idea
>nice light french influence
>cheesy soundtrack
>playful

I could see you working on soundtracks if you really wanted to. What are you looking for -- do you have anything in mind?

Also, do you have any pieces that you would call complete, or are they just little ideas like what you posted?

Either way, I hope you at least keep playing; it sounds like you know what you're doing

Fuck you man I'd you're going to call my work cheesy then don't respond

Dude, don't post it if you get this upset at light criticism. He even threw in a "Either way, I hope you at least keep playing; it sounds like you know what you're doing" there.

...that's what you took away from my post?

I feel like the guy above has to be trolling and wasn't the one who posted the tracks -- note the lack of capitalization in the original post.

I've dealt with people like him all my life they think insulting you baselessly and then putting a cherry on the turd they smeared in your face makes it ok

this guy

isn't me. not sure who he was responding to. anyway i have no idea what i want to do. i've never finished a piece because i usually lose interest in the progression of it. i need to connect with it in some way to finish it. for now i'm just stock piling these types of micro pieces until eventually i feel like finishing one. i cant read music so notation isn't really possible. currently im frustrated that im having difficulty with baroque style keyboard music because that's something i've always wanted to create.

im not sure why someone would put any effort into impersonating someone in a thread like this. but yea that wasn't me.

Don't try to back out of what you wrote -- if you can't take criticism, don't post.

>ywn be as good as J.S. Bach

>baroque style keyboard music
In that case, reading about music theory and taking classes will definitely help you. It's been a long time since I've played Baroque music, but I remember it be extremely formulaic. Once you understand the general foundation, you'll be able to crank out the pieces you've been dreaming of.

Finishing a piece is another thing that will require practice. Short rough ideas are pretty easy, but tying everything together makes things so much harder -- I can't finish anything either.

Good luck.

samefag

why even put effort into being this unconstructive. are you really that bored?

>ergonomics of performance are a relic from the past desu.
only if you never want to have anything played by a real performer, or if you only ever work as a producer - with the finished product being a recording instead of a score.

Classical is all about the written score and the performer. If you're not taking advantage of the nuances and fresh perspectives you get from working with a real performer, you're closer to a producer than a composer.

There are of course guys like Ferneyhough who make things very difficult to play, but they understand what's possible to play extremely well, they know their shit and how to push players to get very interesting performances.

If you dont know your shit and are just writing whatever sounds good to you without care for playability or ever working with a real performer, you're missing out some of the joys of classical music - creating something that performers enjoy playing and want to play again.

how can someone without a music degree give a masterclass on film scoring? He knows how to score films averagely - nothing special, but I wouldn't consider him a "master"
If John Williams or Jerry Goldsmith (rip) was giving a masterclass, I'd be very interested. Even Bear McCreary would be interesting to have a masterclass with. At least Bear knows his shit, and almost exclusively works with real instruments.

Bach can be learned. Learn how he creates his melodies, learn how he creates his counterpoint, learn his harmonies. You can get very close with careful study and lots of practice.

from what i can hear the basics of barque music almost seems mathematical. as for finishing anything i have a dread of something becoming boring. almost like if i can't keep an audience invested in an idea past its initial phase it would invalidate the entire piece so i'm too scared to do anything further in case i "ruin" the idea. i seem to be completely dependent on the mood i'm in so i can't just play whatever whenever which is pretty frustrating.

bump

i foresee an early death for this thread

time marker on the Scriabin thingy? I like Scriabin

Dude that is WAY too fast, plus you don't give any time for any emotion to really set in. You can't even get a real good sense of tonality because it's so fast. Slow it down, by a lot. That would really contribute to the piece's beauty.

Late Scriabin? Around 5:50 at the lowest point before the largest peak.

I never said I would be writing merely "whatever sounds good". I'm more interested in composition as a curative process. I am not that autistic about music, I definitely have an emotional connection but ultimtely what draws me to composition is sort of the concept of solving a puzzle by plugging in the right notes, rhythms, timbres and other sonic elements. In fact only when I began to understand the harmonic series did composing seem viable for me because prior to that I was intimidated by the vision of the composer as the virtuoso artist waving his brush around and producing beauty by mere accident. Now, even insofar as that conception may have a strain of truth, I realize there is another approach that can allow someone like myself to make music desspite having no solid background. Ultimately I suppose "ease of play" could be another parameter to "curate" around but it just doesn't interest me, particularly as someone who has no pretentions of having anything performed.

personally I would regard inability to flesh out melodic ideas into full pieces as a rather severe shortfall I would be working on big league if I were you. I only mention this because I keep seeing you post this collection and you seem to be complacent. But dicking around on a keyboard in not composition ultimately, even if it sounds nice. There's hard work too.

If you're not interested in someone performing your stuff, why bother with all of the typical constraints of composing for an instrumentalist? Why not take the plunge into weirder shit?
xenharmonic.wikispaces.com/

Actually I want to get into microtonality but I am still learning to crawl so I think the good ol' chromatic scale will suffice for the time being.

Thanks user, i just like A minor
i can try
I have been trained a little by a professional composer. Mostly i use my ear to compose.
I will try this, thanks

Can you use any two melodies in conterpoint?

hell no. The intervals between the notes have to be consonant or carefully handled dissonance.

Read Fux or check out the "art of counterpoint" channel on youtube.

Bach literally told everyone how he did it. He literally never stopped working or making music. If you can do that - congrats, you're the next Bach.

The man was one of those prime working Austrians - all they know how to do is work.

I have been thinking about it.. did pianist like Barry Harris, Bill Evans, Bub Powell.. basically any of the greats, before recording a solo piano rendition of a jazz standard, do they plan before hand what they are going to play, or at least practices the song multiple times before hand or did they literally just press record and go?

Because if it's the latter than.. woah man. How can one be so well versed in harmony? I have to practice a tune multiple times, get the harmony right, the changes.. before I actually think about recording myself.

reminder that jazz theory is the only kind of theory that's actually useful

Have a good upcoming Christmas /comp/!

clyp.it/afi4wt1z

that's because you're not a genius

they didn't "plan" what they were doing; they knew they were going to play a basic chord progression and maybe a central melody. Most jazz standards are characterized by one chorus,, with it's progression and melody. Beyond that, it's improvisation. At the simplest level, extending chords and varying the melody is fine.

yeah? since you have it all figured out why aren't you a world famous jazz musician?

But user, I am a world famous jazz musician.

>Hans Zimmer
>average

have you never seen Rain Man or any of the Nolans Batman movies?

Opinions are subjective. Moreover, I'm not really fond of the "how can someone without a music degree give a masterclass" part either.

holy crap it's still alive.

>wrote a piece for the sonatina challenge in the summer
>play it from memory periodically
>look at its score
>dynamics completely different from how I've been playing it
Should I rewrite the dynamics? Or should I respect the composer's intent?

honestly i haven't touched my keyboard in about 6 months and i forgot i may have posted this here. i think it caught me off guard that people seemed to enjoy anything i made and that was enough for me. i'm at a point in my life where i don't enjoy anything and i can't even remember what i did this year. time is just passing in bulk and i don't care to even bother anymore. i know i'm wasting a lot of time but i feel like regardless of what i do the outcome will be the same.

You wrote it right? Rewrite it, call it 2nd edition. Then if you become a big deal people will kill for your first version.

I'm not really sure which one I prefer, though.

If I posted it here without markings, do you think I could get someone more experienced on piano to tell me their opinion of it? It's fairly simplistic of a piece.

always post your work

also, is it in the Drive folder of all the submissions?

Ah, yes it is. It's got some errata though

I think I might rerecord and post a better unmarked score once I'm done eating

How do I stop my fingers from tripping over themselves in fast piano pieces?

I mean at the point where you already learned the piece and you play it by muscle memory, but your fingers simply aren't dexterous enough and fuck up at parts.

It doesn't feel like restudying the piece helps. I'm talking about intermediate level, like say Mozart's Rondo alla Turca from his Piano Sonata 11.
At 1:10.
youtu.be/geER3iQDO5k?t=71
Though in this video the speed is at the limit where I can still play it, but if I go even a bit faster that's when I fuck up. It tends to happen when the speed is continuous, like that fragment where it's full of 16ths, while if I only have to deal with 4-8 16ths I can handle it.

Is grinding technique with Hanon and similar shit the only way?

Y-you too.

Pretty much. Fingering is key my friend. Try to never touch black keys with your thumb, that's rule no.1.

These are the works posted ITT. Good job /comp/

[spoiler]*sforzandos*[/spoiler]

I was hoping against logic that there would be another way. It's boring as fuck but it's such a big limitation, very early on, that I can't find a way around it.

Time to dust off that old book. I only got as far as exercise 16.

>personally I would regard inability to flesh out melodic ideas into full pieces as a rather severe shortfall I would be working on big league if I were you.
Not him but any tips other than practice (which I'm already working on, though I'm slow as fuck)?

before I go on reading into it do any of you have any tips on writing counterpoint?

>boring as fuck

that's your problem. love your piano, respect it. treat it as you would want someone to treat you. i'm not joking.

I dont get it if you wrote it why does it matter

Practice it. Always. Make arrangements and write counterpoint every day. It's the only way.

I guess. I just tend to avoid it because it always sounds conflicting

I like it, I love the feeling of the weight of the keys under my fingers and the different sound that different velocity generates.

But practicing technique is not exactly a fun thing to do, user.

I'll try to do something about my state of mind regarding technique practice, and see if I can make it more rewarding. Maybe make it a game where my fingers should not touch anything else by accident, other than the key it means to touch.

clyp.it/fnvokcbt
Here we go, I rerecorded it. Still has mistakes, pretty big ones, but fewer this time.
So yeah, could someone with more experience on the piano tell me how they'd play this? Like with what dynamics or expressions where and such.

I'm an indecisive fuck who'll spend hours agonizing over a single forte.

Just a heads up - practically your tempo marking of QN=85, then QN=70 does not need to be this exact. Most people will not find that big of a difference in between, say 82 and 85. I only say this due to the fact that when you present this to a player, the most practical tempos matter the most.

>I'm an indecisive fuck who'll spend hours agonizing over a single forte.

Stop it.

There's a much bigger difference between QN=85 vs QN=70 when the primary note value is a sixteenth note, though.
But yeah, I think I'll probably omit the metronome markings and only write "Moderato" and "Adagio" in the final. Those are mostly there to persuade Finale's Human Playback to do what I want it to do.

And yeah, I know.

I'm writing this piece for a school assignment. I have a group of people and we're gonna have to play whatever I write. I'm playing trombone.

Kinda have some idea of what I'm doing, but I also don't really know where I'm going.

Any general thoughts would be cool.

...

...

...