The great debate

The great debate.

if Bryant didn't have the Lakers he would've been Durant pre Warriors bitch move tier
if Duncan didn't have the spurs, he would've had his 2011 Dirk moment, eventually

Duncan has 3 finals mvps and Kobe has 2

Nuff said

how many rings tho

ill take the one who didnt have the pathetic retirement tour to push his retarded brand

go make some more shitty ghost busters commercials kobrick

Duncan got 4 by himself, Kawhi and pop got him the last one
Kobe has 0 by himself, Pau and Shaq and Philly Jack got him all 5

5 each

oh

Does Sup Forums agree that Lebron is better than both?

I'm from LA and I can't "this" this enough. Kobe is a great player don't get me wrong, but Timmy was a consummate professional through and through. Both are phenomenal but Timmy gets the slight edge.

Better than Kobe for sure. Same level as Tim maybe.

Duncan is the GOAT

Robbert Horry has 7 rings.

How can Jordan even compete?

check it

Dirk = Duncan >> Kobe > Lebron

probably true, desu

Absolutely agree

No debate at all. Duncan >>> Kobe
and that's not a knock on Kobe.

Duncan had a god tier career. He's top 3 all time on my list.

Dirk = Offense
Duncan = Defense

However Duncan was better at offense than Dirk was on D. kinda agree w/ what you said though

I don't know why morons always insist on comparing two fundamentally different basketball positions. Compare Duncan to Malone, Garnett, Hayes, Barkley, Dirk etc. How fucking hard is that, you motherfucking morons?

There is no debate at all.
Duncan has a case for top 5. Bryant is a borderline top 10.

>hurr why are people comparing the two best players in the same era

Learn how to properly reasonate, Ramirez.

>Duncan was better because he played basketball the right way

>I rate Duncan

*tips spurdora*