Which punk aesthetic do you prefer? The simpler look, or the more flamboyant look?
Which punk aesthetic do you prefer? The simpler look, or the more flamboyant look?
Other urls found in this thread:
...
Well they're all posers dressing up for attention.
Rollins wore jeans and a t shirt
well one is outdated and the other isn't
I don't think the Ramones were posers. They had a bit of a gimmick, but at the most they were playing up the style that came naturally to them.
haha is that avey tare
Ramones > glue hair any day
the Ramones are wearing the same thing + leather jackets which were common back then
...
The one where they actually look like people.
This.
...
Punk attire is stupid if it's fitting into any kind of stereotypical, trendy mold. That always seemed to me the opposite of what punk was about. Maybe the edgy Mohawks and shit had a point to them when they were originally used by punks as a symbol of anti-conformity, but it eventually just became a trend. So really I thought the idea was always retarded.
Leather jacket are still common.
What a manlet
qt desu
Leather jacket are the shit
yeah
dressing "like a punk" isn't punk at all
>spelling it 'poser'
shut up poseur
Have you seen slc punk? Basically explains how dressing and acting punk isnt punk
The Patrick Stickles look, AKA the insane asylum look.
>how to embed on Sup Forums?
Daily reminder that all punk rock is now dad rock.
See
neither.
stenchcore or crust for me
Right answer.
White teas and blue jeans. Anything else can fuck right off