So the new feminist Ghostbusters has a Rotten Tomatoes rating of 73%...

So the new feminist Ghostbusters has a Rotten Tomatoes rating of 73% . It looks like Gawker and Jezebel got woman to go and write 5 star reviews. The movie is shit can we go to Rotton Tomatoes and rate down this piece of shit!

Other urls found in this thread:

thepiratebay.org/torrent/15266119/[ZZSeries]_Monique_Alexander_(Ghostbusters_XXX_Parody__Part_1)
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Fuck off with this cringe, you supremely frustrated foreveralone sperg. It's not Citizen Kane, but it's not the worst fucking film ever made. It's a 6 or a 7 out of 10. Get over it.

Maybe try building up the courage to leave your bedroom, strap on your velcro sandals, go outside and talk to an actual human female for once.

if you want a decent opinion, its pretty fucking bad honestly. i pirated it, and watched about 20 minutes before just stopping.. it fucking sucked

Sure you did. There aren't even any shitty cam torrents up yet.

better than Ghostbusters 2

You just dislike it because it has women in it.

thepiratebay.org/torrent/15266119/[ZZSeries]_Monique_Alexander_(Ghostbusters_XXX_Parody__Part_1)

>It's not Citizen Kane

Why do a lot of men on the internet seem so threatened by this movie? I am a man and it looks as good as any reboot to me. I will probably go see it at some point.

>Threatened
By what?

By women actually earning a place in society.

They have a place

Its called porn

See, this is the kind of stuff that is holding society back!

Oh noes!! The evil feminist agenda is messing with the meta critic score of a movie I haven't seen but decided I don't like!!!!

Grow up. Humor is perhaps the most subjective thing in the world. I guess some people liked the movie. Sorry that upsets you.

They didn't before?
I'm pretty sure being homemakers and caretakers were a respected part of society.

bro.. watching paint dry, is better than Ghost Busters II.

You're right

The fact that women get paid far more than men do in the porno industry is holding society back

They were essentially slaves in the past. Even today they only make 77% of what a man does for doing the exact same job.

I saw the trailer last night and honestly It doesn't look like the worst movie ever, but it still looks too bad to pay to see. Who cares what a website rates the movie, it doesnt affect our lives.

your mother did porn?

Faggots.

Insinuating women's place is to be completely unoriginal and to poorly remake popular old films - written by, for, and starring men (successfully) - and market them to a susceptible demographic cultivated by the media steering sheeples popular opinion? I think women are capable of original thought and art / pop culture much better than this streaming pile of shit reboot. Here, have some sexualization with your white knight attempt.

source please :3

That's only because men objectify women's bodies. They aren't really seen as people.

Please don't bait. If you're not baiting you should know that the 77% figure is bullshit.

Doesn't mean women don't get the short end of the stick but don't muddy the waters with bullshit.

> this thread
> tards trolling tards pretending to be trolls trolling trolls trolling tards
> sure is fucking summer in here

Dayammm!

So much bait in this thread, so little time!

Google.com look it up.

YES IT DOES
WE MUST HATE THIS MOVIE
ERRBODY MUST HATE IT BECAUSE IT'S GOT ICKY GIRLS IN IT
FEMINISM
NIGGERS
FAGGOTS
JEWS
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Kek
I know you're baiting me with the wage gap myth but I'll bite anyway.
And the men who worked for the companies weren't slaves either?

I mean, they could have cultivated fields, built massive infrastructure, fought brutal, physical demanding wars... oh right, genetics of a species. Nevermind. Objectified? Most definitely so. Slaves? I think a simple google search would show how very wrong you are, user.

This move is so fuckin baaaaaaaad, you're just overrating it, you are the one who should get over it.

no seriously... Ghost Busters is a great, fucking movie. I saw it when it aired, and I've loved it ever since.

but Ghost Busters II sucks dead donkey ass.

Yeah men are the ones buying appearance altering cosmetics for women and making them wear it that's why the advertising is directed towards men

...

No, these women are challenging the male dominated culture we live in today by showing that they can make a movie just as good as men did.

I'm gettin' a tan.

couldn't find it, where did you read it

That stat is absolute bullshit and you know it.

If women were supposed to be funny i wouldn't take tits so seriously.

Because those women have internalized their oppression to a desire to please men.

Even if that were true, which it isn't, that doesn't justify the REAL wage gap in porn

omg a genuine oldfart memelord appeared

hail
hail

niggers

Lol, dude, women buy and wear makeup that conforms to a man's standard of what a beautiful woman is, don't even try.

You don't have to be an off the deepend feminist to know that men have oppressed women for most of the history of civilization.

It's getting better, but it's cool to acknowledge that we're not 100% there yet.

>just as good
>not better

Toxic masculinity got you by the shorthairs

I bet this guy gets more pussy than you.

Oh, maybe it's up to 80% on the dollar or something like that. The point is women are still not equal to men,

They already have a place, the kitchen

>We

How do you internalise an inter-personal concept? Oppression is by definition external

...

>as good as any reboot

So bad?

I bet you don't even understand how problematic that statement is.

When? Please start trying

I think the Bureau of Labor Statistics say that it is like, 97% when you control for every other factor.

The thing that will always be fundamentally unfair is that women can give birth and men can't. Kids are career killers.

Source please :3

>Oppression is by definition external
Stockholm Syndrome, bro. Google it.

It's just a movie

Ghostbusters 2 was also bad it's just how it works.

You need to put your katana away and go outside once in a while and stop bitching about movies.

But they didn't. It would have sucked just as hard with a group of new age male stars too. But you've gotta see you're no better than OP complaining about women in the remake. Again, to argue that a woman's place and proof of societal prowess is to achieve something that men have done before is shortsighted and just as sexist.

Nope.

>b8

NO
NO
NO

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Stockholm syndrome doesn't occur in mentally healthy captives. Please try harder than 'schizophrenia is internal so oppression must be'

yea but the point that they feel the need to compare themselves to the intrinsically superior (from their perspective) male movie is the exact problem.

>I'm 16 and never had a gf so I'm going to be edgy on the internet and join the MGTOW movement and try not to cry my self to sleep tonight again.

Fixed that for you.

No worries Op. When I've seen it I'll be sure to go rate on imdb and your rotten apples thingy.
But I must admit being an older guy who liked the original I have very little motivation to watch a reboot. Why they would feel that they could improve on Bill Murray's work is nothing more than misplaced arrogance.

A great ripoff is more like it. I wouldn't mind that they went all pit with only comedy, if only the jokes were actually funny and didn't fall so flat. But the first joke is about a fucking queef. But nooooo it's a good movie isn't it! Yeah fucking right my friend.

So you're saying women shouldn't try to achieve anything?

If it wasn't for tumblr and retarded 10 year olds that self diagnose themselves depression and 300 different genders. We wouldn't have stupid feminist empowering bullshit like this.

Op it doesn't mean that the movie has a rating of 73%. it means that gets 0.73 a vote for every 1 vote of the original male cast

I dont like makeup and I'm a guy so am I an anti-oppressor or how does the whole insecurity makeup and clothes things worth in the feminist narrative

Cry more.

its pretty bad. the cast did not have good chemistry. I was very aware I was watching a sjw movie. the plot is pretty much a reimahing of the original films. it doesn't copy any of them exactly but a lot of similar themes making the film feel really busy and all over the place. a lot, A LOT of womyn humor. but I also don't like women stand up, so I'm a bit biased, some of you may like the humor. I'd rate it a 5/10 worth a red box rental. but not worth the 16 dollar movie ticket or a download time. overall it doesn't feel like a reboot deserving of the original cast and movies. feels like a Hollywood cash in giving the current state of our countries social struggles. the movie feels like it's all female not because of artistic direction but because the thought theyd take in the cash from sjws

>I'm triggered as fuck and belong on reddit

Fixed that for you

Thats not fair, why should women get 80 cents and we are left with 20.

vag detected

he never said that
>strawman as fuck

Yes

The shittiest, cringiest, most blown out of proportion come back I've ever see.
>you have complaints about an awful movie featuring all women
>that makes you sexist male scum
>reeeeeee

Thats a jesus I could worship

Have you seen Ghost Busters (1984)?

To some people, it's the best comedy ever. The new one might be kind of okay, but... god it's like you compared Jurassic Park to Jurassic World.

...

It was fun. Obviously geared more to kids. Didn't have a broader story than "There ghosts? Get ghosts." No major hardship was overcome through demonstrated effort. Just 'being lucky' till the credits. Played more like a Nickelodeon movie than anything else.

Not brilliant. Could be better. Good to watch.

Idk. I'm a guy too so I don't speak for "feminism". I just think it is probably disingenuous to act like makeup was women's idea.

Girls should wear makeup or nice clothes if they want I guess.

Personally I don't care for makeup and fancy clothes either. I don't need the illusion of "perfect skin". As long as they keep the body tight, I find most women attractive.

Because the only reason they're complaining is because it features women.

triggered

Sigh. If I must spell it out for you, lowly user, I am saying this movie and anything that could be construed as women trying to merely do what men have done before is below there potential. Why the fuck should they strive to do something that has been done before when they are capable of being just as original and pioneering as men in the past? Draw inspiration from things in the past, sure, but don't set the bar so low.

>being this butthurt over ratings on a bullshit website
you're just dying to be outraged by practically anything, aren't you. i used to have a girlfriend like you. if she didn't get to be outraged by something, she'd rage on literally anything... like ratings on a website.

>just as sexist
no no no
let's not stoop to that level, we'll call it how it is
there is literally nothing wrong with being sexist, and this movie was just another in a long line of reasons justifying why.

>Stockholm syndrome doesn't occur in mentally healthy captives

...

Anyone who is upset by a score on rotten tomatoes or metacritic needs to seriously rethink their entire life.

When they 'reboot' Sister Act uising only white males, I'll take notice of these fucked up ways to push agendas through entertainment.

Until then, it's nothing more than vacuous idealism being shoved in our faces.

>that response
>incoherent babbling about lost love

What was her name, user?

...

You are a sign of the times. Look at how men view women in 2016. We are no better than we were in the dark ages.

>le triggered meme

Hold the fuck up. That doesn't make sense considering both Jurassic Park and Jurassic World were good movies. The original Ghostbusters movie in '84 was great but the remake was pure shit. Just remember that

>theyd take in the cash from faggots
Fixed for you user.

Laci, the movie sucked, get over it. We're not all fedoras kitten.