can you?
Can you?
48 IM RETARD
5
>(1/4)/(1/2)
You think I'm Simon Hawking or some shit nigga?
8
5
8
/thread
kill yourselves.
What does the variable x represent?
4+1/16x
multiplication you idiot
easy, 37
Ur mom
Assuming the '1/4' = 1 (due to it coming after the four), half of one is obviously 0.5.
So 4.5 x 8 is 36.
I'm either a genius or an idiot.
36
It's 8
4 + 1/4 / 1/2 * 8
4 + [(1/4 / 1/2) * 8]
4 + (1/2*8)
4+4
8
answer is 17
It's 5 tho
it can't be solved without more info, but I guess that's the whole point of this troll
8
Order of operations str8 rekin fools
Ever went to school retard? Order of operations tard.
68
You mean Steven Hawkins?
8 yah dipshits.
Clearly 5. Dare I say PEDMAS
4+ 1/4 / 1/2 * 8 = 4+ 2/4 *8 = 4 + 16/4 = 4 + 4 = 8
Retards... 1/4 / 1/2 is 1/8
1/8 x 8 is 1
4 + 1 is 5
Faggots
P E M D A S
newfag
Correct
8, ez
4+0.25%0.5x8
4+0.5x8
4+4
8
it sure is summer you newfag
1/4 / 1/2 is not in fact 1/8, because if there's fraction division the latter number flips upside down and the division sign becomes multiplication, for example
1/4 / 1/2 = 1/4 * 2/1
2/4 / 3 = 2/4 * 1/3( because any non-fractioned number can be written as a fraction x/1, x being the number in question.)
nah
1/4 (= 0.25) % 1/2 (= 0.5) = 0.5
0.5 x 8 = 4
4 + 4 = 8
>1/4 / 1/2 is 1/8
>correct
It's not dividing fractions though, nothing implies that. It's division left to right. So 1 divided by 4 divided by 1 divided by 2, then multiplied by 8, equals 1. 4 + 1 = 5.
It's confusing because two different division symbols are used, and neither denotes fractional notation the way it's written.
so it can be 5 and 8
It's 5 you idiots
The smaller print implies that it is actually a fraction. the division symbol is diffrerent too, to make it clear, that in fact, it is a fraction division
5! learn rules!
4+(0.25/(0.5*8))
4+(0.25*4)
4+1=5
Why the fuck do people think that multiplication goes before division?? They go in order they're written, from left to right.
4.25 / 4 = 1.0625. You have to group it using parenthesis and then solve using PEMDAS?
It's 8
5
/thread
...
There is no fucking need for paranthesis, only use MDAS
Fair enough, I'll concede that.
How stupid can u be?
1/2*8 = 4
1/4%4 = 1/16
4 + 1/16 = 65/16
There is no difference between
>1/2
and
>1 divided by 2
Fractions are divisions.
what the fuck
so even if you do it your weird ass way the answer should be the same. Either there is an error in your calculation or this has two answers, which isnt very probable
Wtf is this shit
(4/1)+(1/4)=5/4
(5/4)÷(1/2)=10/4
(10/4)(8/1)=20/1
Since there's no specific Order between multiplication and fractions it works as well.
4+1/4%1/2*8=
4+1/4%4=
4+1/16=
(64+1)/16=65/16
been 25 years since my algebra class....i'll give it a go...
1/2*8 = 4
4/1/4=16
16+4=20
answer is 20 according to order of operations
It's 8, and theres no debate. one half is 0.5 and one quarter is 0.25.
Use brackets in the input field. The formatted expression is a different expression that yields a diferent number, faggot. 8 is the right answer, folks
4+1/4%1/2*8=
4+0,25/0,5*8=
4+0,25/4=
16/4+0,25/4=
16,25/4=65/16
Prove me wrong!
no prob, homo
its 8
4+(.25/.5*8)
4+(.5*8)
4+4
8
...
>0,25/0,5*8=
>0,25/4
Wrong. It's (0.25*8)/0.5
Can I ask you how 0.5 * 0.25 = 0.5? Rather than 0.125?
Edit: That isnt a multiple. Sorry.
By writing 0.5 and 0.25 where you did, and adding that fraction bar where a regular division symbol used to be, you added assumptions about the order of operations to the equation.
I didn't "add" a fraction bar, i used / because the weird thing with dots and a - is never used in the real world. ½ is 0.5, so theres no problem there, and ¼ is 0.25. This would've been wrong if the op equation had said 1/4, but it didn't, it used the symbol for one quarter, ¼, which equals 0.25.
if you think that, you're obviously a faggot
>pic related is equal to
dividing by a fraction is the same as multiplying by the inverse of that fraction
I agree it's never used in the real world, just second grade math, and I hate the thing. The main issue is you started division on the left, then jumped to the right, then back to the middle.
The REAL real issue is this equation is written like shit, as are the ones in bait threads similar to this.
Don't cheat, fucker
>(a/b)/(c/d)=(a/b)*(d/c) provided that b, c and d are not equal to zero.
lol
i agree, that's more precise
4 + 0.25 \ 0.5 * 8
4 + 0.5 * 8
4 + 4
8