1. Your country

1. Your country
2. Your city
3. Is your city aesthetic?
4. Is it the most aesthetic of your country?

1. Portugal
2. Coimbra
3. Yes, I think so.
4. I think we could make a case for it, yes.

1. Iberia
2. Segovia
3. Kind of
4. Subjective question

1.Spen
2.Cuenca
3.Yes
4.Doubt it

Hill-side cities are always great.

Our 2 or 3 flat-land cities are so meh.

>1. Your country
Apezil.
>2. Your city
Sao Paulo.
>3. Is your city aesthetic?
Depends on what you call aesthetic. Commie blocks aside, we've got some graffiti and a couple well-designed buildings like the Museum of Art. Overall it's a third world version of New York City with average-looking residential neighborhoods, so it hasn't much to offer in this regard. If punk looks is your thing though, you might end up liking the shadier parts of this place.
>4. Is it the most aesthetic of your country?
Hopefully not.

No, I meant a city as a whole, so small details like graffiti or poorer parts.

That picture of São Paulo looks pretty great, actually. It doesn't have a focal point to look at, but the colours are pretty nice.

I like Ouro Negro as well, but I'm biased towards that.

1. Hungary
2. Budapest
3. Yes
4. I think so, although there are a number of other aesthetic towns I could imagine living in for a couple of years

1. Poland
2. Kraków
3. Yes
4. Yes

>Your country
Portsugal
>Your ""city""
Tomar
>Is your ""city"" aesthetic?
I'd say it's historically aesthetic
>Is it the most aesthetic of your country?
No

The layout reminds me a lot of Coimbra in the OP. Is that where you have the parliament building? Cause if so, then it's disqualified for not being fair to anyone else.

Did those old buildings survive the war, or were they built anew recently?

They look too clean, but classic, so I'm guessing rebuilt or at least repaired.

Cosy.

Canada
St. John's
Yes
Arguably, yes

Kraków wasn't touched during any of wars since XIII c.
They're all 100% original

Well then, good job at that.

Flag
Mexico City
The historic part, certainly
I think it would be a tough call, you've got stuff here you couldn't find anywhere else but in terms of an harmonious picturesque whole, there certainly is a lot better, Guanajuato would probably be it.

Yes, the OP picture actually reminded me of Buda Castle, too, I guess it's just how people way back during the middle ages chose to build their castles next to water, on top of a cliff or a hill, with the town below.
Also, yes, the Parliament's in Budapest.

In my pic it's a University. One of the oldest in Europe. I really like my pic because it looks ready to be painted in oil.

The Hungarian parliament is just cheating, though.

Looks beautiful, m8.

1.Turkey
2.Bartın
3.Yes !
4.No.

1. Portugal
2. Évora
3. Yes, definitely
4. Don't know if it is the most aesthetic, but its definitely close to the top.

Where's Geraldo?

Giraldo, its the open space with those buildings with arches in the bottom half of the pic.

Based.

I've never been to Évora.

1. Portugal
2. Santarém
3. I think so
4. Nope

That statue is not located in Évora, its on a small village called Valverde about 10km away.

1. USA
2. Pittsburgh
3. Sort of aesthetic, depends on your tastes. I really like the way parts of the city look.
4. No, I would put several other cities ahead of Pittsburgh.