What are Sup Forums's opinions on gun control?
Personally, I believe while people should be able to keep guns, they should be much harder to get and to keep and the only open/concealed carry weapons by civilians should be pistols. Also hunting rifles should be on-site rental only with very strict rules and stipulations
Other urls found in this thread:
Why should hunting rifles be more restricted than handguns? Most crime is committed with handguns
Shall not be infringed faggot.
Have you ever smoked pot or been offered illicit substances? See how easy it is to get something thats illegal?
Apply the same logic to guns, because thats what happens.
PROHIBITION DOES NOT FUCKING WORK YOU FUCKING LIBERAL CUCKS.
It wouldn't prevent criminals of getting guns, so why should the goverment prevent a working class man to get one?
Im hookd,seriously wtf is OP talking about
I believe owning guns in a home for protection is perfectly fine. People like to argue that that is what police are for, but it takes on average 15 minutes for police to arrive on scene after a call. And that's 15 minutes that some man is in your house doing whatever the hell he wants to you until they get there.
Exactly.
"If you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns"
Criminals don't care about laws. Making guns harder to get will not do anything to lower the number of shootings
I did in fact, clearly say I don't support prohibition, just stricter laws. Stricter gun laws have already been instituted in the past which reduced gun violence rates. Also, the second amendment was passed almost 300 years ago and our forefathers would be appalled at how far firearms have come since then; it's different now.
Also, because they are essentially useless and more dangerous. Handguns can be used for protection and are easily carried.
you actually own a k100? any good?
once again, I did not say I was in support of prohibition of guns
Guns help to control the population. Now I know that seams a little harsh, but seriously, alot of people need to die.
already been infringed. you can only own certain weapons from a government approved list. :)
I feel like this isn't a valid-pro gun argument
that and 99% of people who own guns use them for legitimate purposes such as target shooting and hunting.
outlawing them will not do any good. drugs are illegal and look how well that's going
Non-whites shouldn't be allowed to own guns.
Only white people should have the right to bear arms.
no thanks, id rather talk about all these hillary leaks, nice distraction attempt though.
Personally, I believe while people should be able to keep guns, they should be much harder to get and to keep and the only open/concealed carry weapons by civilians should be pistols. Also hunting rifles should be on-site rental only with very strict rules and stipulations
Alright, third time, I didn't say outlaw. Not what I said at all. Also, that 99% statistic is not true, you must be aware we are in the midst of a gun violence epidemic, yes?
Cool, but how about no. Hunting rifles are used for hunting as are shotguns. When was the last time you went hunting for a deer with a fucking handgun? As for okay well I said on site. The fuck would I go to an enclosure to hunt an animal who is basically caged then. Fuck off.
Too bad whites are a bunch of pussies that are afraid of guns.
rifles are useless. Yeah ok. Tell that to the millions of hunters out there and people who use shotguns to protect their houses
Have you been to Texas Roodypooh?
Leftists should be gassed.
Why do you care? You can't do anything about it.
As a person who makes a living selling guns to these criminals I can attest to this, people would be amazed how easy it is to get an illegal weapon.
I meant hunting should be more regulated so as to regulate hunting rifles. Shotguns as well
They can use handguns
Shotguns aren't rifles.
Shotguns have smooth bores, while rifles have, you might guess it, rifled bores.
Pistols could be considered rifles because their bores are rifled.
Lol whites afraid of guns? Have you never been to the southern United States?
True but making it harder for criminals to get guns is still a good thing to do. Even if they can still get one it would definitely reduce gun violence rates.
I know they're different but according to OP they are the same thing
You really need gun control if you want to hit what you are aiming at.
I didn't say that though. They are the same in that tey are dangerous weapons, however
That make's no fucking sense.
Why so we can be even further restricted by the state to force us to not live off the land then? Cause that is what you are basically suggesting. I guarantee you with your dumbass plan that we'd be charged an astronomical fee once we shot the animal.
I sell almost exclusively to criminals nignog they come to me when they can't go legal because of their background. And a US gun ban wouldn't slow anything down.
Bunch of fat rednecks living easy lifes, and shouting "muh guns"
Really manly.
If you are limited in where you are allowed to go hunting and are allowed a hunting rifle/shotgun for use at that specific site as a rental, you can hunt without having to own a rifle/shotgun. It makes sense
George Washington would have busted a nut over the guns we have today and would have given one to every American to obliterate the red coats
If that's what you think the whole south is its your loss.
...
I mean regulated only as it applies to where you are allowed to do it. You should have to pay to rent the hunting weapon, and that covers costs, what you suggest doesn't make sense really
...
Are you really this retarded? Damn user you are making my head hurt.
/thread
You're a fucking faggot. If you believe any gun rights should be restricted, you shouldn't own a gun at all. You're not a American. You're not a constitutionalist. You are a libtard infringing on others inherent rights to defend themselves.
Kill yourself.
Yes it would. Unless every single criminal who ever wants a gun goes underground to do so, it does.
...
Yeah soldiers holding weapons is different than criminals holding weapons though, and he would be appalled to see guns today.
...
There are rifled shotguns.
Sounds like you should study firearms more.
Why? What's the problem exactly?
Every single criminal does have to do so it's illegal to buy a gun if you have a criminal past. What part of this van you not understand?
I know, it's hard to get used to at first, but after a while you'll be like " hummmm people died...Meh".
Guns aren't the problem. Guns are the scapegoat. If you want to reduce the amount of gun violence and crime in general there must be something done about the culture and socioeconomic factors that plague certain hotpots in the country resulting in disproportionate violence and crime (places where gun restriction is all ready high).
>Stricter gun laws have already been instituted in the past which reduced gun violence rates.
Lol no they didn't.
Can*
N R A
Lifetime member.
Suck it, spineless liberal jellyfish.
Yes, but you aren't thinking about capitalism. Anywhere were those slimey bastards known as our government can make money they will. Your rental plan would look something like.
Rifle Rental: $50 an hour
Land Roaming Fee: $75 an hour
Bullets: 5 for $10
Killing an animal: $150
Alright well that kind of thinking is a little backwards in my opinion. Adhering strictly to a document written 300 years ago is kind of nonsensical, especially because the constitution has an amendment by the original writers of it to modernize it and keep it in tow with the times because of technological advancement
...
Only people who shouldn't be able to get guns are people in an fbi watchlist, or people with violent crimes on their record. That's about it
This
Those are actually rifles. Just because you can shoot shot out of a rifle, doesn't mean it's not a rifle.
People with criminal pasts can still buy guns, especially easily at gun shows or other events, and people being investigated by the FBI can also still get guns.
I think for handguns should be limited to revolvers like in the old west, that way people get to have guns, but the guns are not tacticool assault handguns. Plus we can bring back duels, I think it would be cool as fuck. Compromise with each other boys and stop arguing
Curious, Why do you think hunting rifles should be on-site rental only, and have more strict rules?
I'm fine with the only open carry being pistols. Concealed isn't really practical for anything other than a pistol anyway.
Gun permits, restrictions on types of guns available to the public and restrictions on where guns can be kept and carried have all effectively reduced rates of gun violence look it up
Show me a rifle that can shoot shot.
Excluding pistol caliber/.22lr rat-shot.
Step 1: take all guns
Step 2: replace with shanks
Step 3: watch all people who try to break the law get shanked.
Seriously how have you guys not figures this out yet. It is sad
What if I need more than 6 rounds? Cops also miss about 80% of their rounds under stress.
>Adhering strictly to a document written 300 years ago is kind of nonsensical
Let me make you a promise. Before I make that promise, know I am not trying to be an internet tough guy.
Know this: if liberal cucks like you convince the federal government to infringe on ANY of my constitutional rights, including the 2nd Amendment, I WILL start shooting and killing people like you.
Also know that's a plethora of Americans (e.g. current and former military, current and former law enforcement, militias, etc) that WILL join in on the slaughter.
As we tell you libtards all the time, come and take it.
How do you protect yourself from a dictatorship and crooked government if your not equally armed? If the military can have it, I need it to possibly protect myself from any governments military.
Well even though I mostly disagree in that there's no need for most of those fees and you are only speculating, less hunting doesn't sound like a problem to me anyways tbh
also rentals don't have to be directly government, they can be contractors to the government, etc
I barely know anything about firearms, but I believe shotguns are a type of rifle. Let me check
Literally any shotgun with a rifled barrel.
Now you may ruin your barrel, but it's still possible.
Do you think people go hunt at places that have the facilities to "rent" a hunting rifle?
>assault handguns
Although i'm sure (hoping) your comment is in jest I cringed hard.
Checked.
I am wrong
I explained it earlier on and went a little in-depth, basically they are essentially useless for civilians and are more dangerous weapons
People being investigated by FBI can also run for president if their being investigated they haven't always committed a crime. That's also selling without a license which is illegal.
Only in certain states. Here in GA pretty much anything you can afford and get appropriate tax stamps for are g2g. Also you can't be a criminal shitbag
"I believe people should be able to have guns, BUT;"
No, you don't. Stop using the "hey I'm a cool dude like you too!" ruse to push your agenda.
Obviously you don't know the degree at which hunters limit the population of certain game animals and what they can do if they go uncontrolled.
I should've said "Show me a rifle designed to shoot shot."
A shotgun with a rifles barrel is for unrifled shotgun slugs.
Not him but we're not tho. Legal gun ownership accounts for a less than 1% rate of the gun violence in this country. It's not us. It's criminals with illegal guns.
See people like you who say things like that are the reason guns are so dangerous. If you make promises like that so easily on the internet, I just feel like you shouldn't own a gun. Responsible people who actually know when they have to take life or not should be able to.
No, and that is what I meant should have to change
The only thing that has correlated with gun violence declines is these types of laws expiring, and a gradual decline over time irrelevant to exterior factors.
Go home, liberal
Their not useless for civilians I regularly use a "hunting rifle" to kill the foxes and wolves that try to get my chickens.
nope, dope. try again. :)
It still brings up the possibility that they are a criminal. The investigation should be lifted before they can buy guns, which would've prevented the orlando shooting. Also, selling guns to people at gun shows and stuff is legal. I've seen 13 year olds purchase them.
A shotgun with a rifled barrel becomes a rifle.
"A rifle is a firearm designed to be fired from the shoulder, with a barrel that has a helical groove or pattern of grooves ("rifling") cut into the barrel walls." According to Wikipedia.
Therefore a shotgun with a rifled barrel is a rifle regardless of whether you shoot slugs or shot.
I do though. It is a right, and a fair one because they are good for protection, but that's about it
All sane, able bodied persons should recieve gun saftey training and be giving a hand gun and rifle upon completion.
"See people like you who say things like that are the reason guns are so dangerous. "
So now you think inanimate objects AND words are dangerous?
No, people who say things like that are a reminder of why the 2nd amendment exists in the first place. Because if socialist cucks like yourself try to stand in the way of individual rights, the path to freedom will run red. Just because scared vaginas would rather live in safety as slaves, doesn't mean people who aren't massive vaginas wouldn't rather keep their dangerous freedom.
I'll bleed before I kneel and there's literally nothing you can do about it.
I said less hunting. Fair point though. However, less hunting could promote this control and also promote growth of dwindling species threatened by hutning. That's for a different thread though
Your fucking stupid
Just increase the population of predators?
Don't think mag capacity bans and requiring background checks on ammo will do anything productive. But I'm thankful we can watch California fall apart due to insane gun grabbing legislation instead of having the entire country suffer the same fate as the result of a Clinton-based AW ban that will inevitably turn into a full-on gun grab because "guns are bad, protect the children" is the progressives' bread and butter.
If Hilary gets elected she'll just send an email out to one of her cave cunt contacts and have them shoot up another gay club with a "weapon of war" so she'll have more leverage to get her precious AWB bill back into law.