/brit/

Post in this thread if you're a big stinky poo poo pants who likes dicks in his mouth all of the day

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=4xAeSkdtaeI
is.Sup
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

me i like that

yeah me

What occurs in Leeds

>dont want to live in the depressing suburbs or out on a boiling farm
>the only other option is multi-million dollar semi rural estates
hmmm yes
maybe i'll just live in a shitty apartment in the city

Only about 5% of Britain looks like that
The rest is ugly as shit

Australia is miles more aesthetic and better looking than Britain

haha yeah

>suburbs are depressing because I say so

alri mate haha

That is the essence of right wing politics and what egalitarian leftism seeks to destroy. It is why leftist governments are so preoccupied with things like the American affirmative action, progression taxation and standardized public education.

t. tower hamlets resident

>tfw Britain used to be one of the most aesthetic countries in the world (as did the rest of Europe)
>turned into some ugly gray giant industral estate

what the fuck happened

see i got trips

...

Should just kill the lower classes then

I have been all over the country, into remote corners you probably didn't realise existed

If anything, London is one of the last remnants and glimpses of how nice Britain used to look

I really wish I had some British m8s to banter with 2bh

>captcha: hard cornwall

would rather enjoy getting naked with a girl and feeling her boobs and arse

These fine egalitarian communists happened

>>tfw Britain used to be one of the most aesthetic countries in the world

Literally when

the nazis

not even close
Australia looks like an overgrown California suburb that became its own nation

youtube.com/watch?v=4xAeSkdtaeI

Doing a Sherlock lads

Whoa take it easy there!

Just because someone isn't as capable as someone else doesn't mean they should be killed!

You leftists sure can get crazy

That's literally a picture of Nevada you dumb leaf

>why does britain have bad architecture now
>this isn't the fault of the people who dropped thousands and thousands of bombs on aforementioned architecture
jesus
the state of rorke

for some fucking reason all my files on my computer are now read only. haven't even touched file permissions this install. fuck windows

Is this sarcasm? You must understand to a certain extent that the lower classes are largely in their position on their own volition rather than what leftists believe, that any deviation from "success" is either the result of oppressing or being oppressed.

Shall be heeming the next runt I see virgin walking

people who wont shut the fuck up about retarded materialist ideologies they devote their lives too

>Shall be heeming the next runt I see virgin walking

Install Arch Linux

*virgin walks into the thread*

...

I don't understand what you mean so you're wrong

>Install Arch Linux

Howzat!

>suburbs aren't depressing
i know nothing about anything: the post

Ah yes because bombs in London managed to change our architectural style

Never post again you retarded child

already have gentoo on my laptop but I use windows on my pc for gaymen and that and it has given me nothing but trouble for the past 3 years. windows is SHIT

>Because sharing property in large societies is logically not feasible as you can only know and be intimate with so many people and so only tolerate sharing with so many people, you would get communities splitting off
i really don't think it would be. communities splitting off would be to their detriment as smaller communities would mean more basic amenities. i would have no problem sharing with friends of friends of friends as i'd trust that the community at large was being fair. i'd trust that if someone was not doing their fair share of work then others would be equally as annoyed and would call them out on it.

if it turned out that what you're saying was the case its still vastly better than what we have today

the 1960s did more damage than the Luftwaffe ever did
and I even like modern/post-modern architecture

Polite reminder to abstain from pleasures... or else

Prepare for your heeming, yank

Pls respond

t. Sadia 'poo in it' Nutella

...

>Permissions just changed themselves.
How did you even install Gentoo?

>London
umm literally all the comfy industrial northern towns were reduced to rubble and we had a population surge post war coupled with literally millions of homes needed to be built at once on a relatively tight budget (even though the yanks sorted the boys with some dollar)

of course it looks shit

I quite enjoy my suburb, maybe you should move out of Mt Druitt

If you aren't capable of explaining your point so that it can be easily understood then more often then not you are on shaky ground

This is why leftists will typically hide behind word salads and rhetoric that is deliberately designed to confuse

world war 2 motherfucker

are you sure you're not just stupid mate? right wingers tend to be less intelligent

leftists would have better equality, rightists would have less to pay for. Its a win:win


No, no it is not. Are you already trying the drugs to get into another plane?

what suburb

If you're on a deckchair in the front row
you best watch yourself because OVER THEY GO

fair it's a statist approach but there's nothing inherently wrong with that. you're a bit caught up in the whole philisophical aspect though, if you work your whole life and afford a nice comfy home and the gov takes it away when you die it's not like you'll lose any sleep over it (you'll be dead lmao) there's not much moral argument saying your children deserve to inherit 500k because you shagged their mum
and assuming this is implemented within a capitalist system the house just goes back on the market and the gov reaps the profit, still a statist idea but doesn't really offend the idea of private property as you suggest
and as I said, there can be regulation in effect where a child could buy back their home cheaper or something

yeah m8 that's why I said an inheritence tax wouldn't effect the class system, I support the general layout of our capitalist society and it's just that the rich constantly getting rich due to the nature of holding wealth and capital gains means that society as a whole doesn't get richer and there's this stupid divide as seem in America

>Wouldn't a high inheritance tax just cause parents to transfer their wealth to their children while they're still alive?
that's why you'd have regulation in place, and even if there are workarounds someone might only be able to transfer $2 million to their children instead of $3 million

>Can't you cut taxes by reducing government spending and therefore the need for such taxes in the first place?
not an argument

>What is wrong with the rich getting richer?
it's unsustainable to have these people with so much money they have no concept of it, surely you rorkes understand that with the main argument against immigration is that incessant growth and piling on of people can't and won't last forever

ohohoh ah yes this explains it all

Need to sleep, night burgers, night communists xx

Get yourself a PS4 and save your poor PC the pain

Shall not read even a smidgen of this

anyone ever seen a Fairy Ring before?

I've seen one hiking around here

>No, no it is not.
how would it not be? not if you're in the top 2-3% maybe but for the 97% others it would be

Haberfield

Full of old Italian people, nice restaurants/homes/parkland and relatively close to public transport

Can you legally buy and own a crossbow in Britain? I was thinking of buying one so I can kill squirrels and then eat them. There are several online places where you can buy one, I just want to know if my house will get raided by the police if I order one

>a capitalist society in which everyone has wealth according to the value of their work is what we need
>everyone has wealth according to the value of their work is what we need

Labor does not determine value and the strenuous labor of an individual making minimum wage and the money manipulation of a lethargic rich man create unequal value simply because the value they create is not at all proportionate to the intensity of their labor but rather their services being valued differently by other individuals. This is what Communists actually believe, that value is inherent to a single individual when it is purely a social concept that exists between people.

I didn't FUCKING touch the permissions. also that was the problem with firefox not loading Sup Forums scripts btw, fixed now. and linux is 10x simpler compared to windows

>not doing their fair share of work then others would be equally as annoyed and would call them out on it.
>vastly better than what we have today
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

>lol i quite enjoy being in the top 10% best suburbs in the country, why dont you just move to a richer suburb
blow it

i shall be reading this post as it is interesting to see actual discussion that doesn't resort to calling people pakis, jews, or rorkes (fedoras)

theyre p common bruv

standard fungi operating procedure

You're mentally ill

Hell yeah

>Haberfield was dubbed "the garden suburb" in the early 20th century and retains its well-kept parks, tree-lined streets and fine Federation-era houses with immaculate gardens. The entire suburb is heritage-listed
gee whiz i wonder why you like it

currently those not doing their fair share are so rich and powerful they can influence the minds of people to make them blame their problems on people fleeing war torn countries

not a fan of suburbia but we definitely have some of the nicest looking suburbs in the world

this is where marco rubio lives, no self-respecting australian with decent money like him would be caught dead in a place like this

saw one once an my third eye started hemorrhaging spiritual energy

me

well done

the proto gf was talking about gutting/cooking and eating roadkill earlier

>stealth in the Batman Arkham games

>1960s
which grew out of europe being decimated and widespread rebuilding in the most cost-effective way possible

Pinted with the lad at the Cheltenham hasbeen festival in the summer. He's a good chap.

Yes, there used to be one in my garden

Explain to me what is wrong with killing and eating a tasty invasive species

The argument was whether suburbs were depressing m9

Not my issue you live in a poo one

Will bugger the first lad who replies to this post

babestation boobs

bit anti-semetic

hello

Will bugger the first lad who buggers a lad

fuck off back to canada

Absolutely buggered lads

poofs

do people call each other "big guy" regularly in the uk? pretty common here for someone to say "watch out big guy" when squeezing past you etc.

>there's not much moral argument saying your children deserve to inherit 500k because you shagged their mum

Yes there is. It is the foundation of civilization, the nuclear family, and the continuity of them. What exactly is the purpose of being productive whilst concurrently having children, continuity, if you cannot guarantee their well being after dying? Generational wealth is one of the many incentives of being productive rather than producing bare minimum which is inevitable in wealth-distributive states.

The better solution would simply being progressive taxation (to avoid the inevitable amassing of stagnant money) rather than the breaking of familiar continuity and the replacement of the family structure within the state.

is.Sup Forums.org/gif/1483393262170.webm

collecting for the poor, plz give generously

for fucks sake brain, if you're tired then go to fucking sleep

It is an argument when your entire point is that inheritance tax will do away with the need for other kinds of taxes

Why not just cut public spending and cut taxes too? Or just cut public spending and keep taxes where they are

>it's unsustainable
Money is different from people namely in that money doesn't need food or shelter or medical care and it won't commit crimes or bring disease

There's no argument to be had for trying to stop the rich from becoming richer because wealth is non zero sum

Now if wealth were static then you could argue that it would be wrong because someone being rich would then mean someone is poor as a result but that's not the case because wealth can be created

Don't think you have a big enough piece of the pie?
Bake one yourself it's really not that hard as is evidenced by the millions and millions who lift themselves out of poverty every year

That's the economic reality in which we live

that was a meaningful sequence of events

>suburbs aren't depressing because i say so
hmm full circle