>1. Are you absolutely sure there is no God? If not, then is it not possible that there is a God? And if it is possible that God exists, then can you think of any reason that would keep you from wanting to look at the evidence?
Yes, I am absolutely sure, that there is no god. If there was any evidence for the existance of god (Please differ between "evidence" as used in the law and "evidance" as another word for "clue" or "hint") I could be sure of his existance.
>2. Would you agree that intelligently designed things call for an intelligent designer of them? If so, then would you agree that evidence for intelligent design in the universe would be evidence for a designer of the universe?
If everything was intelligently designed it would indeed make sense to assume, that there was an intelligent designer. Yet, there are too many things without purpose in a pleothora of species (including the human) that it would be ludicrous to assume such thing.
>3. Would you agree that nothing cannot produce something? If so, then if the universe did not exist but then came to exist, wouldn’t this be evidence of a cause beyond the universe?
I agree, that from nothing cannot come something. Yet, non of the currently most popular theories about the beginning of the universe (including the big bang theory) claim, that the current state of existance originated in nothing. In all theories the singularity was caused.
>4. Would you agree with me that just because we cannot see something with our eyes—such as our mind, gravity, magnetism, the wind—that does not mean it doesn’t exist?
Yes, entirely. I, however, do not agree that everything, that cannot be seen with our eyes, must exist.
>5. Would you also agree that just because we cannot see God with our eyes does not necessarily mean He doesn’t exist?
Not being able to see god is indeed an insufficient method to prove or disprove god.