Its a real shame that the Foo Fighters get a bad rep here considering that this album is solid as fuck
Its a real shame that the Foo Fighters get a bad rep here considering that this album is solid as fuck
hi dad :)
>dad was born in 1999
>not underage
are you like, 1?
even worse you're not underage and enjoy Foo Fighters
because liking turd collective, ganye and radiomeme is so much better
even worse, you can compile a coherent sentence yet you still think le dad rock meme is a real thing
it makes sense that you post on Sup Forums
that's a step above liking foo fighters no matter how small
lolwut
there is truly nothing more plebeian than being part of the Sup Forumscore hivemind
even your average normie girl who listens to whatever top 40 songs are less plebeian than the average Sup Forumscore listener. they unironically enjoy their music far more than the average Sup Forumscore listener
>lolwut
definitely underage
look, foo fighters arent the best band by most people's measures but their not the worst shit ever. op's pic related has some solid jams on there, especially Stacked Actors. if you wanna keep up with your silly strawman shit go ahead. it's just a boring meme at this point.
nah lol
nah they're pretty average, it's post-Nirvana without Kurt doing quality control
I was conflicted when Letterman was so high on them.
I AM conflicted because Letterman is high on them.
Papa Letterman.
>they're not great but they're not bad
>nah they're pretty average
You're good at nuance, huh?
Also, if you like Nirvana listen to the first Foo record which is just Dave solo, playing a bunch of songs that were meant to be Nirvana songs.
>lolwut
>nah lol
>this is the post quality of the average Sup Forumscore listener
how do we fix Sup Forums?
I was trying to be nice
Nirvana was good-average foo fighters is bad
agreed. Aurora is amazing
Their first 3 records and Skin and Bones are great
>i was trying to be nice
By being extremely divisive and flippant?
You come off as a retarded, uninformed, kid. I've said it multiple times, but I'll say it again, Foo Fighters aren't great but their not bad.
Maybe listen to more than the singles before you make vastly generalising opinions or/also threads on a subject you no next to nothing about.
l8er sk8er
you come off as having shit taste because you actually believe foo fighters is anything of substantial quality
Merry Christmas faggot
you said they were average so you completely agree with my sentiments
merry christmas, 12 year old Sup Forumsfag. i hope your mom whips a Colour and the Shape jewel case directly into your eye ball while informing you she's been cucking your faggot dad
why the fuck would I like a band for making a "solid" album when they're supposed to make an actually good one?
only smart person in this thread
Also fantastic album
as much as I enjoy TINLTL there's something sad about a band's best album being like a generous 7, 7.5/10
>top 40's grill less pleb than Sup Forumscore
I hope this is bait or you can fuck right off
other than that Foo Fighters is an overrated pleb band that's released the same mediocre album repeatedly with no experimentation
But what you're not realizing is that FF is a greatest hits band. They've had plenty of solid albums but it's the greatest hits that's gonna be the 8.5+
Think about it.
this
Dave Grohl biggest influence is the Beatles. He just wants to write nice songs but with a rock vibe
the Beatles experimented a great deal more than the Foo Fighters ever have
If you have songs from a band called "the Foo Fighters" in your library you need to off yourself
Hence their greatest achievement being their greatest hits.
Usually my favorite Foo Fighters songs are the album tracks. Everlong, Best of You, etc. don't do it for me.
what if it's mislabelled? can i just maim myself?
The only acceptable one would be Foo Fighters - Kung Fu Fighting.
I just can't agree with that user, at least the beat les had some cohesiveness and thought to their critically acclaimed albums. Rather than just a few tracks that got overplayed on the radio and got memed into oblivion.
>THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST
There's definitely a lot of gems on the albums.
Personally I love songs like: My Poor Brain and See You but I'm arguing with 12 year olds that think Foo Fighters are as bad as Nickleback (who are also underrated and a scapegoat for a lot of nonsense).
Obviously there's a lot of nuance on the albums.
>a few tracks... on the radio
Check that assumption bra. Foo Fighters have had a ton of successful singles
Definitely not just "THE BEST" tier shit.
I think there's just one retard in here. The average person with good taste rarely hates them on a Nickelback level, just finds them middling at worst. As an aside, Nickelback isn't always offensive to me, but I can't defend the impact they had on the market.
With Foo Fighters, I think the problem is that people don't remember they used to be worthy of the "alternative" descriptor. When they hit the One by One album (the last album I can say I liked, though not as much), they started this transition to more generic hard rock. In this way, they are similar to Metallica, both in scope and sound, just as Metallica was a heavy influence on Nirvana.
Are the new singles being played still because they're good or because it's the Foo Fighters? Honestly I have nothing against the 90's FF since they wrote catchy shit that wasn't bad. Everlong is a great pop rock song. Since then, they don't have much to show for unless you want to correlate singles sales with music quality. And you could defend plenty of shit music with muh sales or muh popularity these days.
tl;dr dave can write a good song but never let him do a full album again
Their first three albums are classics. Anyone who tells you otherwise has an enormous ego which prevents them from enjoying life.
The main riff in Stacked Actors is nice
that's not the point you stupid fuck