What's your opinion on her outfit and looks Sup Forums?
What's your opinion on her outfit and looks Sup Forums?
Other urls found in this thread:
family-studies.org
twitter.com
If she dressed better she wouldn't look like a man.
Unique and eccentric. Looks like a fun chick to be around. She has a very kissable face.
Outfit is unheard of, to say the least. Looks like Jemma Simmons from Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.
/thread
Why should I care?
Looks the same as she did 2 days ago when you posted the same shit you un-original fuck
She looks like someone who wants to disguise themselves as a pile of charity shop clothes, thrown in a disorderly pile in the corner.
You mean one you can do this to
Tryhard, but not too terrible. Except the shoes, those were just a bad idea with any style.
...
LMAO kkrgrappig vriend, wat is deze?!?
Is that her?
Looks like an acid trip.
Seems like a bit of an individual.
I find people who dress eccentrically interesting, and have many friends who do so.
A lot of people who criticise those who dress differently normally look like shit, themselves.
DURR, THEY LOOK LIKE SHIT. I'M PERFECTLY HAPPY WITH MY CARGO PANTS AND ILL FITTED TSHIRT
I AM TRIGGERED
Pretty average looking and her style sucks.
dude of course not, compare their faces ffs
Raar wijf
welke stad?
Chill, I know that feeling... but you not here to get Triggered. You have an open mind and didn't judge people for being them self. I like you.
The tights and shoes do nothing for her and the ninja turtle april look screams prude bitch who probably likes being choked but sucks in the sack.
Inb4 much hip very unique no fart sniffing
Given how short that skirt is I'd bet money on her being a "sex-positive" disgusting whore.
I like you, too.
attractive at first glance. get my attention, but probs out of my league in general
Thank you for saying that. I would have been much more of a dick.. original cum bucket uploader
You should like a person who had little to no sex, and now you're bitter towards any woman who has a sex like with anybody who isn't yourself.
Cry more.
Not an argument kiddo. Address the points made or fuck off.
Being a whore is something that has been derided for all of human history. It's not something to be proud of. That's why "sex positive" is a joke.
she's wearing a skirt in 2016. you living in the middle ages calling her a whore for that?
>its the future so showing skin is progressive and not whorish. (Even though its literally done to be attractive).
Whatever makes you happy.
>It's the current year
Not an argument. Are you capable of making one or not? If you can't then I won't waste my time replying to you.
She is likely a whore because she's wearing a skirt that is about 2 inches shy of showing her vagina or ass cheeks. Is this something a woman who wasn't a whore would do? Whores show off their bodies to get attention from men. It's part of the profession. Only difference in LE CURRENT YEAR is that women become whores and don't even get paid for it.
Niet weer de Delftse del...
A whore is somebody who has sex for money.
She is wearing a skirt that has been perfectly acceptable in society for many decades.
You, or whoever wrote the original comment, sound bitter as fuck.
Throughout history a way to demonise and criticise women was to make them sexual creatures.
That stems from the point of view of:
A man who has a lot of sex is powerful.
A woman who has a lot of sex is a dirty, immoral thing.
Being sex positive is about equality.
Once again, you sound bitter that women are fucking guys who aren't you.
Go back to the middle ages.
she doesn't even show skin ffs
Hou op aidsbaby
Do you go outside often? You probably think only whores wear fishnet stockings, too.
You are so out of touch with reality, and it's actually a bit frightening.
naam? of meer foto's?
>Has been accepted for many decades
Being a slut has never been acceptable. Stopped reading here.
>Ad hominem
Not an argument. How many times are you going to do this?
>people are not allowed to make themselves appear attractive to others.
That would explain why you likely look like utter shit.
Reddit is that way fags...
Exposing or very nearly exposing your sexual organs is not the same thing as making yourself look attractive.
I honestly disagree, i love the clothes but she looks like a 4/10
Haha, you are so stuck on your own warped definitions and interpretations of the world.
Wearing an above knee skirt does not mean a woman has a lot of sex.
I feel sorry for you, man. I hope you meet somebody in real life that can open your eyes to the world. I mean that seriously.
While I think she's a try hard, my ideal girl actually likes the way this looks and would wear it because she likes it, not because she wants other people to notice her.
Women shouldn't be fucking guys that aren't me. God damnit...who let reddit in here?
>Being a slut has never been acceptable. Stopped reading here.
I was talking about wearing a mini skirt, which has been in and out of fashion since the 60s.
Talking about out of touch with reality...
A wise man once said it's all relative.
Would this woman be wearing this outfit in the Middle-East, she would definitely be showcasing slutty behaviour.
However, considering she's in northwestern Europe, it's rather normal to wear stuff like this.
I think considering this is a whorish outfit says more about your view towards women than the actual state of affairs.
Yes in fact it is you retard. It attracts the opposite sex by stimulating the biological need to reproduce. Are you fucking retarded?
I didn't say the skirt has to be below the knee. I said her skirt is about 2 inches short of exposing her vagina and is thus what many would consider "slut wear."
To the guy that is crying about how degrading women for being sluts is wrong: give me a minute and I'll get you some statistics on marriage happiness and divorce rates by number of sexual partners. Surprise: the happiest and most stable marriages are comprised of spouses who have had 1 or 0 sexual partners other than their spouse.
>Arguing semantics
You would agree that a shapely woman in tight jeans would look attractive, yes? However that's not the same as exposing your sexual organs to the public, which is historically the domain of prostitutes.
Women can be attractive without being whores.
Longest lasting does not = happiest when it comes to marriage.
>asking for Sup Forums's fashion opinion
Interesting as this discussion on women's fashion might be, I'm even more interested to know OP woman's name or seeing more pics of her.
Eat shit, whore sympathizer. Enjoy being divorced.
family-studies.org
Usually worn by girls who are at least semi-attractive and would follow fashion; rather than what the other user is suggesting, which is the modern 'sex positive' harlot chic look. The 'look at me I am so alternative, yet modern and progressive with how I display myself'.
Personally, I see her outfit as frumpy and a likely sign she is one of those girls who is into illogical politics and unironic knitting and crafts.
She needs to tuck that dick under a bit further.
seconded
But she is wearing tight jeans, which shows off how shapely she is. This is the same as her wearing a top that shows off her cleavage.
The clothing accentuates or brings attention to what people may find attractive.
And here's one on happiness.
Now tell me again why whores shouldn't be derided as they always have been just because it's the current year.
Correlation does not imply causation.
thank you sir
Tight jeans do not show your vagina (if you're not wearing underwear like I would expect OP whore to do) or your underwear if you are doing anything but standing up at the same elevation as everyone else.
Again: dressing attractively and dressing like a prostitute are two different things.
Amsterdam/10
You seem to be against women having sex.
Is it because you're insecure that she'll likely to have been with somebody who has a bigger dick than you?
You just want somebody with minimal sexual experience so you can't be compared to others.
It looks like a tranny from Finland.
Not an argument.
looks ok, but if she was my girl I wouldn't let her out in shit like this. Shorts are ok but you don't have to look like a retarded slut in this skirt (?) and whatherver she's wearing on her legs.
just my opinion
I'm not against women having sex. I'm against casual sex and sluts.
As for the rest of your post: Not. An. Argument.
Don't you have a pseudo report for Jezebel or Buzzfeed to write?
Once again, you are warped or have little experience in the real world if you don't think normal girls, who aren't prostitutes, don't wear shorter skirts.
Get out into the world, broaden your mind. You'll see how wrong you are.
this thread has been great with popcorn, but serious question . . . are you on the autism spectrum?
Since you cannot provide an argument I guess I won't either.
No, you're wrong. I'm right. Fuck you retard.
serious question, are these women whores?
I want to tell her that it is time to start prepping the anus.
Do you have (m)any female friends?
You'll get a complimentary but compulsory serving of vegan food gas, with a side helping of entitlement in the form of more gas.
All of my friends are female, and my girlfriend (who had only ever been with one guy before me, and we've been together 5 years) is sleeping in my bed right now.
wauw iedereen valt in deze bait haha
I will pay 1000$ for three more pictures of her
Is she a keeper?
Sup Forums is basically reddit at this day's. more Traps, more yelling and all that "Newfag/Oldfag". Pull it out and you have reddit
With that bitter taste of additive known as tumblr.
That's surprising. I'm just trying to understand how you've come to develop the way you think.
Ah well, I completely disagree with you, but what can you do?
Delft
Wtf is reddit anyway? Always hear about it. ..never been compelled to go
As far as I can tell.
>I'm trying to understand how you've come to think this way
Easy: look at how relationships with women who sleep around end up, and look at how relationships with women who don't sleep around end up. On average the former is far worse than the latter. There's also the fact that I have statistics backing up damn near everything I think about women, so that helps.
there are many better looking dutch girls.
Pol Pot killed millions, Hitler, millions. Mussolini, Ho Chi Mihn. All millions.
Does this make it acceptable since there was so many?
Just because a lot of people do it, doesn't make it right.
She's a whore. And a hipster cunt.
Pol pot was a good guy
pic related
Fuck you edgy cunt. Cambodian genocide was one of the worst in all of history.
No, it doesn't make it right. What made Hitler's actions right were his targeting of a persistent cancerous group of people who infest the countries they inhabit like termites and control them from within. Other than that...
Im joking you fool, its my picture, i've been to s-21 and killing fields.
Thats a picture from inside the monument at the killing fields near phnom phenn.
According to family-studies.org
Even in the 2000s women with 2 sexual partners had the second highest rate of divorce.
When you as your girl to marry you, make sure she hasn't had exactly 2 sexual partners.
Are you married to her and did you have sex with her prior to marriage? Because...
She's from the netherlands, kankerfags
Bump for thoughts.
She is a work of fiction. Not a real person
Faggot
C'mon. What catagory are you in?
I'm more interested in those tattoos on her legs, so hot
Probably fucking some immigrant from Suriname.
I already said 1 partner.