Appreciate me yet?

Appreciate me yet?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=PORnP8k70xs
youtube.com/watch?v=oRh8qQyIngg
youtube.com/watch?v=MDi0IihxfBA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>nigger actor not mentioned on the poster
Appreciated

I never disliked it, I just thought it was bit underwhelming after the first one. First movie had this cool interdimensional thing going on with Lovecraft vibes, but the second movie felt like it was building up for something big and it just wasn't as epic.

Just look at this picture, can't top this with some stupid painting and slime.

Ghostbusters 2 felt more like setup for Ghostbusters 3, or a synopsis for the cartoon show episode.

Yes

I liked Ghostbusters 2, but not as much as the first one. The new movie will probably be terrible. It sucks that you can't say anything about it without be called sexist.

Everything was cool with me except the nice slime/evil slime shit

That was just pants-on-head-retarded

Also, yeah, the final boss could have been much better, I mean in the first one they fought a mesopotamian FUCKING god

His name's the first in the bottom scroll after the movie title though.

Why did they hate Winston so much? He was great in the movie

So was Vigo responsible for "placing" slime in the abandoned subway lines below New York City?

NO!

didnt really like ghostbusters much

maybe my memories are poisoned by ghostbusters 2 tho

i feel like im struggling to remember much of the first one besides crossing the streams and the staypuff marshmallow man

>or a synopsis for the cartoon show episode.
That's what a lot of people think, between Janine's new look, friendly slimer, and the ghostbusters not drinking or smoking it was heavily influenced by the cartoon. Makes you wonder who really wrote it.

>tfw no good behind the scenes documentary for Ghostbusters

Always did

yes

I never knew people hated this movie until I was on the internet one day. I always liked it as much as the original. But then again, I'm not a huge Ghostbusters fan.

Autism

Ernie Hudson ain't no "nigger" you honky.

GB2 did nothing wrong. In all honesty no matter WHAT kind of sequel we got it would have been judged harshly in comparison to the original.

I might be the only person who liked it better than the first. Not by a lot but still.

youtube.com/watch?v=PORnP8k70xs

me on the left

No, and you never will.

I thought the idea of a possessed painting was cool. I just wished they played around more with the concepts

He shouldn't have even been in the movie. The character was only in it for the money and to serve as an audience proxy so the Ghostbusters could explain what's happening.

Yeah but the whole way they defeated him was pure shit

So, you spray him with happy slime and this simply sends him back into the painting, then the painting is replaced with a painting of the ghostbusters with the baby

Let that sink in.

Seriously, it feels like the writer was like fuck it I'm stopping right here

It's like an 11 year old wrote the ending

oh shit I forgot about the other painting, when I was a kid I loved it though

Whatever you think of the story, the cinematography was wonderful. Pure GB porn.

youtube.com/watch?v=oRh8qQyIngg

youtube.com/watch?v=MDi0IihxfBA

Even as a kid it felt a little anticlimactic for me.

After the whole ordeal with the Stay Puft man and all-powerful Gozer I was like, wow, is that it?

I never really understood why people hated this movie

Agreed, new poster here.

The "solution" was a severe cop out, and the whole "entire city is dancing and being positive" is so fucking cringey, it was like a misused dance skit

I don't hate it, but I was really underwhelmed after the first one was awesome

The ending, to me, was anticlimactic see even when I was a child

Also the whole thing with good slime/bad slime was really stupid. I feel the writers could have done much better.

To me the movie felt too much like they made a sequel because they were pushed to, as opposed to the first movie where it felt like they were there because they had genuine love for what they were doing.

It does, however, have some great moments like so I do like the movie, I'm just not as crazy for it as the first one

When I was a kid the walking statue of liberty, still does.
But yeah, gooing a painting was really not-intense.

GB2 had some legit scary moments (the subway, photos of Vigo where the fire breaks out,) but you have to wonder if GB should ever be legit scary in the first place.

(cont.)
Also, it's too much like the first one. I really don't see why they had to build up so much at the start, it's like having yet another origin story because they have disbanded and have to come back together. We had already went through this in the first movie

I would have loved if this movie got that out of the way and got down to action quicker now that they were established.

Also it's depressing that these guys saved the city, I was expecting them to still be heroes years later but no, they were once again forced to disband and were fighting legal battles. To be fair, that's probably how the city would handle the disaster of the first movie, but still it's not something you want to see happen when the hero does something incredibly awesome for the city and then they turn around and push them into the mud.

I think it should be a little scary, gives a sense that the ghosts are actually dangerous in some way.

I think what GB2 also had that's unappreciated is some of the same, good humor that the first one had. Obviously not as good as Ghostbusters, but I still find myself chuckling through Ghostbusters II

I think that was a big joke about New York that they literally saved the world and still got sued and shit on, also had to do with the cynicism / negativity thing

>but you have to wonder if GB should ever be legit scary in the first place.

Been a long time since I watched either but I feel that was a definite part of the recipe. The original film starts out in a "definitely creepy" way. Thing is they just override the actual fear factor with attitude of all sorts.

HE GONE DO IT

i really don't get the hate for this one. i've had fun with it. its not bad at all

I never understood the hate because I saw it so young.
It's pure nostalgia for me.

>Better late than never...

Same. Never knew it was panned. It didn't deserve to be - it was an excellent sequel, as far as the history of movie sequels is concerned.

I grew up being ashamed because even as a kid I knew everyone hated GB2. Even as a kid I knew it wasn't on par with the first but these people who screech about it being some kind of abomination against god and man just puzzle me.

>Also the whole thing with good slime/bad slime was really stupid.

What's wrong with that? It's slime that feeds off human energy, whether it be positive or negative. It's not inherently good or bad you mook.

>what's wrong with that
>the strongest final enemy of the movie is defeated by slime that gets happy or angry depending on how people feel

lol if you still don't see what's wrong with that

did you eat a lot of paint chips as a kid?

Ernie Hudson's character originally had a much bigger part to the first movie, with a complete backstory and everything. It was only after he arrived on set that he found out they drastically cut down his role, where he doesn't show up until halfway through the movie, only joins because he needs the money, and pretty much only delivers corny one-liners. I guess he really did need the money, though.

kek. Fuck off faggot.He wasn't defeated by the slime - he was defeated with the positive vibes/energy of the people of the city. He needed negative human energy to come into existence.

Come back to me when you've written something better.

>he was defeated with the positive vibes/energy of the people of the city.

Wow... when you put it that way, I mean that makes me want to agree with you...

No actually

That's somehow even more gay and stupid when you put it that way, thanks for proving my point further

What a sensitive little world-ending supernatural supervillain, defeated by happy thoughts lol
Yeah, Gozer was a pussy compared to this guy LMAO

Not really.

>hurr durr positve energy is gay

lol, you 12 year old, backpeddaling shitstain. Don't get pissed at me because you couldn't properly interpret a fucking Ghostbusters movie. Was it as good as the first? No - but there was nothing wrong or off-putting about personifying negative energy in slime within the context of the GB universe.

>is ok with a villain that's defeated by happy thoughts
>calling others 12 years old

kek ok kiddie

Ok - while were on the subject, let's look at how they defeated the villain in the first film:

The crossed the streams - which worked because of made-up science jargon.

That's it. Sorry the second movie didn't live up to that brilliantly written ending.

Crossing the streams made sense.

So pop quiz, kiddie, do you understand WHY crossing the streams killed Gozer?

Does anyone here?

Please, feel free to answer.

Why did crossing the streams defeat Gozer.

I will wait exactly 5 minutes then I will enlighten you.

TOTAL PROTONIC REVERSAL!

HORRY SHEEEIT!

Because your mother is a whore.

You're on the right track.
But how did that help?

wow you're a master debater. No, you've won that argument beats all... in the first grade schoolyard.

Grow up, chump.

Feels good to be right! Yeah!

I always liked it better than the first one.

That made no sense
Back to school kiddo.........summer has come real early

If I remember correctly, it reverses the energy and sends Gozer back to whatever dimension she came from. Complete pseudoscientific fantasy.

Just like the idea of slime that feeds off positive and negative energy.

>using the summer meme

You're hopeless.

lol no

Wanna try again or should I school you?

The fact that the threat of the ghosts is tangible is part of the charm. Makes the attitude of the ghostbusters more appealing

lol no

You're done - you're attempting to argue how pseudoscience in one Ghostbusters movie is better than psuedoscience in another. You're beyond autistic and I have no interest in continuing to engage in this discussion with you. Have a good night though buddy.

not that user but you're acting cringey as fuck

Fine I won't explain it

Gonna go out a limb and say I honestly believe that the big moment where the city goes to shit is legitimately more terrifying in GB2 than the original. When the mayor looks out the window and the clouds and sky are getting all fucked up is still creepy as fuck, also the line of ghosts coming out of the Titanic looming at the dock with that gaping black hole in the hull.
Also THIS fucking thing.

If you listen closely you can hear the sound of no one caring

Yeah I loved that whole sequence.

That's fine too

Never fucking reply to me again unless you are contributing to the thread.

ok

/r/ing the webm of the spooky dog monster arms coming up through the chair [spolier]and coping a feel[/spoiler]

Bill Murray and I agree that it never should have been made.

Never fucking reply to me again unless you are contributing to the thread.

Mike and Jay hate it so it must be terrible.

It isn't clear. Could be that the slime had always been there and Vigo's spirit awakened and subsequently began to control it.

Unless I forgot something.

Either way, I never had any hate for Ghostbusters 2 and was surprised at its bad reception as I got older.
Interesting that James Rolfe mentioned that he was conditioned, due to a multitude of bad reviews, to just write the movie off, only to be pleasantly surprised later. I wonder how many other people this.

I liked it more than the first.

>hating an original Fettuccine

smdh

>Crossing the streams made sense

It was reversing the polarity of the neutron flow all over again. It was just a deus ex machina that was mentioned early so it wouldn't seem to come out of nowhere.
Same with mood slime. Remember that these were comedy movies, and weren't intended to be hard science fiction films.

>It was reversing the polarity of the neutron flow all over again.

How did this defeat Gozer?

Doctor Who didn't have a Gozer episode.

Also, here's what I'm looking for, maybe you guys can deduce it

See where I'm going with this

How did crossing the streams defeat Gozer
Why didn't all life and matter in this universe explode like Egon said

Hint:
These 2 are connected.

Janine got even sexier, and I liked Lewis's expanded part in the sequel.

>"So, you live alone?"
>"I used to have a roommate, but my mom moved to Florida."

I as well liked the sexier sluttier janine

The real question is why exactly would crossing the streams pop all of the protons in a universe in the first place, and why wouldn't destroying one universe through an open door destroy the one it was opened to as well?
This is total protonic reversal, after all, and the door did swing both ways.

Both universes should've been obliterated.

... but my favorite was the one from the cartoon

oooh la la

Didn't I already BTFO you?

...

I only knew it was hated when I saw people defending girl busters

no, I don't recall, I only remember you blabbering like a child so I ignored you

anyway, quiet down kid, adults are talking

This guy finally got it

When they crossed the streams, where were they pointing them?

INTO THE DOOR TO ANOTHER DIMENSION

The streams were crossing as they were going in

Thusly, all life and matter in the other dimension ceased to exist, including the open door.

It cause total protonic reversale in Gozer's dimension, obliterating everything including the door. Our dimension was not affected because once the door ceased to exist there was no gateway here. The huge explosion also happened to fry the marshmallow man.

How the Ghostbusters survived is beyond me, though.

>Janosz
>Sexy Janine
>based Lewis at his best
>Vigo
>Peter fucking with Vigo at every opportunity
>Venkman's comfy as fuck apartment
>the Scoleri Brothers
>the entire court scene before the Scoleri Brothers

What do you mean yet, OP? Ghostbusters 2 was great.

>so uh you wanna play Super Mario Bros?

The huge explosion also happened to fry the marshmallow man.

If the gateway ceased to exist, then no explosion would've happened in this universe. The explosion was the result of every proton going off in a light-speed chain reaction. Why would it suddenly decide to stop just because it blew up a door? The reaction would still continue.

cool fanfiction

No, that was what Aykroyd had in mind. Both universes would still have been fucked since the chain reaction made it through the gateway before it fucked it up.

>Why would it suddenly decide to stop just because it blew up a door?

Because the door ceased to exist

Everything in that dimension, including the door, simply wasn't there anymore.

>"Your Honor, ladies and gentleman of the, uh, of the audience, I don't think it's fair to call my clients frauds. Sure, the blackout was a big problem for everybody. I was trapped in an elevator for two hours and I had to make the whole time. But I don't blame them. Because one time, I turned into a dog and they helped me. Thank you."
>"Very good, Louis. Short, but pointless."

Moranis was off the fucking chain in 2. Courtroom scene in general was GOAT, too.

Well, there IS also a theory that the Ghostbusters, and all of the world, died and the sequel is them spending time in purgatory and shit like that

but who knows

And yet, the explosion still escaped the other universe. I'm not saying the door didn't cease to exist. The explosion still managed to go through it regardless. Why did it stop if it was a chain reaction? Wouldn't the neighboring protons reverse?

Would've given some credence to the Hellbound script.