Alright, user. Here's a question for you. I don't want to discuss your feelings about it, it doesn't matter anyway

Alright, user. Here's a question for you. I don't want to discuss your feelings about it, it doesn't matter anyway.

If you are offered the opportunity to give up your current life in exchange for one in slavery (no matter if you are male or female), where everything is decided for you and everything you have to do is follow orders and sometimes endure some exertions or pain - all your current social contacts are being taken care of, as are all other obligations… Would you do it?
Or, if unsure, if you were given the chance to "test" this arrangement for a weekend beforehand, would you try it?

I would not. I would not mind having a female slave though. I am male btw.

I would at least try it out… Female here

Female here too. I too would do it for a short amount of time. My biggest fear is of becoming addicted to it because it's not practical to give up my real life for it

i would try but im to crazy and lazy so id probably murder the owner for waking me up/making me do something i dont like

Are you male or female?

male

I have been contemplating this all day.

I have come to the conclusion that many humans would submit to this. It would be worth their time if they wanted out of their lives.

I tried to kill myself once. I don't feel that way any more but this could serve as an alternative

>I have come to the conclusion that many humans would submit to this
I myself (OP) can't really understand it. Or understand yes, but I can not relate to it. And it's a topic that I have a lot to do with, as I have to slaves (in the BDSM sense, 24/7) that I take good care of. I know what they want and expect and how to make them happy, but I can't "feel" how it must feel for them, empathically.

but doesn't that just make you at least slightly curious, cuz that's the only reason i'd say yes

>but doesn't that just make you at least slightly curious
No, it really doesn't. I can see what it is like to be used as a slave, and I can to some extend understand what it feels like, but there is no cell in my body that's interested in trying it out.
Don't ask me why. I'm a very curious person normally.

fair enough op

>it's not practical to give up my real life for it
"It's not practical" or "I wouldn't want to do it"?
There's a lot of people who successfully do it, actually. But it's a decision that can't be undone easily. I don't know anybody who does it who's younger than perhaps 40 years.

>If you are offered the opportunity to give up your current life in exchange for one in employment (no matter if you are male or female), where everything is decided for you and everything you have to do is follow orders and sometimes endure some exertions or pain - all your current social contacts are being taken care of, as are all other obligations… Would you do it?

As a neet who will probably go homeless once my parents die, I think this would be best for me tbh.

How old are you and where do you live?
Are there no other alternatives for you? Like, you know… getting a job?

> getting a job

user that's a crazy idea.

>user that's a crazy idea.
Yes, it is. I don't know how it came into my mind even.

In all seriousness, though. I have severe social anxiety. Makes it kind of difficult to keep a job. I've toyed with the idea of just submitting to a woman or couple, tbh.

>I have severe social anxiety.
Alright, that actually explains it… to an extend. There are ways (medication mainly?) to deal with social anxiety, am I right?
It kinda sounds like "the easy way out".

Slavery does sound easy, user. Very easy.

My family and career are too important for me to sacrifice

That's probably the reason for most people to either stay in "normal life" or have a BDSM relationship.

To add to that. I've always been quite a submissive person. I don't mean in a bdsm context. Just a kind of "pushover" guy, who got bullied when he was a kid. You know the type. So I feel like it kind of fits.

>So I feel like it kind of fits.
That's interesting. From my experience in the BDSM community, most people have had at least a phase in which they were like you describe. I for one consider myself having been a "weak" kid the first two(?) years of school, when I was six years old. However, that seems to be in no relation to which "side" they choose. Generally it looks like those who gut bullied for a longer time tend to "turn out" submissive, though.
As is true for you.

I'd be interested in how other Anons have experienced this.

i would at least try it, most likely do it

I think voluntary live-in sex slavery will become more mainstream soon, as a career, with regulation.

That's a trend that's already happening from what I can see. I think that's mostly due to easier access to related pornography.

By the way, if anyone actually wants some more exchange on the topic, you can contact me via: [email protected]

F or M? Dom or sub?

I'm / / So: M, Dom.

Well are you in search of slaves? Or why make the thread?

>Well are you in search of slaves?
If the right girl was to pass by, I wouldn't say no. But as it's with "normal" relationships, finding a slave (or master of course) that really matches you is very hard. The probability of that happening here is… almost zero.

>Or why make the thread?
As I said in the OP, I wanted to know how people feel about the subject. Also, I just like talking to people about BDSM, especially people who don't primarily have contact to "the BDSM community". Which I don't like very much.

Oh yeah, and then when you want to quit, you get half of your master's property.

I'm a believer in the "order of nature" so to speak. In all groups, social hierarchies form. There is always an alpha, the betas, and always an omega (the one at the bottom of the social hierarchy). I like to think of slaves not because it's "hot" but because it's "our place". Most people live their lives refusing to accept their station in life.

>There is always an alpha
Let me guess: you're from the US?
I don't mean that negatively. It's just a way of thinking that's very, very dominant in the United States. To a certain extend it might be right, but it's not completely.
In my social group I observe several "power bubbles" so to speak. That's groups of people, often only two or three, that have their own hierarchy. When the bubbles or parts of those bubbles interact, no power slope exists - or if so, only concerning a certain subject ("I know more about topic X than you, so as long as we're dealing with that, I'm the boss").
It's kinda hard to explain. Perhaps you get the general idea?

Oh, and in BDSM that's very important: as a Dom, thinking you have to find your "place" when dealing with another Dom can't really lead to a good relationship.

I'm not from the US.

Of course, that's just my opinion from my own observations. I'm in no way trained in neither psychology or anthropology to make an informed statement about human social hierarchies. Hell, I suffer from severe social anxiety so social settings are kind of foreign to me in the first place.

>Well are you in search of slaves?
To add to that… I actually did find a slave here not long ago, but it's "only" online education. Still very interesting, though. And it's my first sissy slave ever.

>Of course, that's just my opinion from my own observations
Sure. Don't get me wrong: me having a different picture of the subject doesn't make it "more correct", even though I obviously do feel like it. It might even just be different in your environment than in mine. Different groups of friends (if any) and stuff.
Or the hierarchies are there even for me, I just don't focus my perception on it. Or you focus on it a lot and interpret power slopes into situations where there are none. We'll never know.

> I just don't focus my perception on it

I think this is it. I'm very conscious of when I'm made to feel "lower". You know like how when a group of friends are about to get into a car? Who gets to ride shotgun? Who gets to sit in the middle of the backseat? Perhaps I'm just silly.

>marriage BTFO

Image for attention. Let's get some more opinions!

>Who gets to ride shotgun?
Mmmh, as simple as that sounds, there might actually be something to it. Interesting thought!
See, that's why I like this kind of threads. If you read it with open eyes (haha), there's always intersting aspects you didn't ever think about.

I don't want to sound arrogant but feel like this might: I've always been a dominant person (without even knowing it), and that might be the reason I don't percieve hierarchies that much (unless they're spoken out, like "I am your teacher"), as I usually stand at the top anyways, so it's not that important for me to think about it.

And one more aspect to this: I don't feel that someone in charge is "more important" or "worth more" than someone at the bottom. Just to bring it up.

These are things that may sound silly, but deep down there is a reason why things play the way they do. We organize into social hierarchies whether we realize it or not.

Again, this is all my opinion based on my observations and my own experience as an "omega". Many people reject the idea that humans organize themselves in alpha, beta, etc roles, as is the case in wolves and other social animals.

If I didn't dislike Goreans so much, because they take it like a fucking religion, I'd probably subscribe to their ideas.

there is no difference between the situation you describe and my current life

Pass thanks. Good thread doe.

same boat man. i wish i could force myself to do the shit i know has to be done.

>deep down there is a reason why things play the way they do
I'm not 100% sure how I feel about that, but it really got me thinking and I'll probably have to observe it more deeply in the next days/weeks/months/years(?).

What I find funny is that there's so many so very basic thinks that nobody ever talks about. Not because it's a taboo, but because people usually don't feel it's even a real topic at all.
That's something I've always liked on the chans: if you are lucky and there's a good thread, you can really talk about interesting stuff.

>there is no difference between the situation you describe and my current life
How so?

Give it a try. observe groups from an outside perspective and try to determine which one is the alpha, etc. Sometimes there aren't clear definitions, it's true. But sometimes there are.

Anyway I'm out, I need sleep. Good luck in your search.

>Good luck in your search.
Thanks, same to you - for your very different search.

It was nice talking to you.

I don't know if I would do it, but I'm not saying no either, however if i do, I'd have to keep my job and care for someone I love. So I could never have that freedom.

No I don't think the army is for me. Or the reserves. I'll keep my 3500 a week job. This thread got deep though. Nice job, OP.

...

Try it for the lulz for one weekend and then decie against it.

It's just not worth it and you are basically cheating yourself.

"Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither."

Let me add that I'm not against BSDM from a "moralical" point of view. For example I think open relationships are great, because they force you to think a lot about your feelings and get rid of that "mommy/daddy complex" - because that's what most people seek in a realationship, someone who tells them they are a good boy/girl.


Going your own way is much harder, not being afraid of the hurt, risking things, making own decisions.. Yes it's hard in the beginning, but every step makes you stronger.

When you only get agreement from your partner or have an abusive realtionship you will get weaker and weaker every day.

>It's just not worth it
That kind of depends on the individual. If submitting is in your nature anyway, why not do it permanently?

>have an abusive realtionship
But BDSM doesn't mean you're in an abusive relationship, or do I understand you wrong?

Alright, thread seems dead. Lust bump

Why not submitting to various differnt people?
Any stable relationship will get boring sooner or later, and if you are also submissive your life will be boring as hell.

Have you seen "desperate houswifes"?
Yup.


Yeah, bad wording. My bad.

BDSM can be anything, it's better to think of it as non-vanilla-sexual-orientated.

>Why not submitting to various differnt people?
Sure. I never talked about a one-on-one-relationship. In real BDSM that's pretty rare anyway.
Good slaves get used by various people, and serve together with other slaves. Still, there's friendship and affection. It just takes another form.

>BDSM can be anything, it's better to think of it as non-vanilla-sexual-orientated.
Very well put, I completely agree!

nope, fuck that

>Sure. I never talked about a one-on-one-relationship. In real BDSM that's pretty rare anyway.
>Good slaves get used by various people, and serve together with other slaves. Still, there's friendship and affection. It just takes another form.

Now we're talking!

Now bend over like the little slut you are.. :)

>Now bend over like the little slut you are.. :)
I'm afraid it's rather someone else who does the bending.

That's my life now except I get paid

switching ftw !

:P

>switching ftw !
True, many people do that. I hope this won't sound like it's "not as good", but: most people who switch are looked at as if they weren't taking it "as seriously". Which is totally fine, as there is no real reason to take BDSM seriously at all. It's just not for them.
But for real 24/7 people, it's no option. The Sub wants to feel owned and cared for, and not just for a while - while the Dom wants to be in charge and care for the Sub, and not vice-versa.

I know this will sound trollish but isn't this how the military operates for non-officer ranks.

I've seen some documentaries showing the effects on some ex-military of such a controlled life (similar to prison).

>I know this will sound trollish
It doesn't. already noticed that though.
It's definitely not what I had in mind, but might be an interesting aspect.

>obviously hoping to find slave on Sup Forums
>faggot
>srsly. faggot.

Former 0311 here. I don't think it's quite the same.

Yes, your life is regimented -- sometimes minute by minute -- but there's room for initiative in the military, at least after basic.

>there's room for initiative in the military, at least after basic.
Sounds right. But I also suppose (haven't been in the military) that you don't enjoy the service itself as much, as the time with fellow soldiers at the barracks and stuff. Am I somewhere near correct?

In the context of the op post would someone looking to have a "no-initiative" but do what they are told well life get what they want.

This isn't to deny that those with initative would be encouraged and thrive as well, just wondering about the ones coasting along.