Homophobes are repressed bis. Multiple studies confirm. There's a reason they're so butthurt.
>Both groups (non-homophobic and homophobic) showed arousal to females.
>Only homophobic group showed arousal to males.
>Homophobic group all denied, in every study, that they were aroused by males
Other urls found in this thread:
Dude you're a complete piece of shit fucking faggot, just cause somebody hates your male sodomizing tendencies doesn't mean they secretly want to fuck you in the shithole stop being a faggot QUEER
KEKKK
...
>I rage against science
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEE
why do you care so much?
My reaction to finding out there were gay guys was "cool, maybe I'll have a chance to get a girl now."
I think gay sex is nasty and i'm not gay at all.
i've tried trust me
>fat ugly people are nasty
>therefore people in general are nasty
are you going to provide a source of ANY kind or are we supposed to just take your word for it?
>implying that that isnt true
The worst bait i ever seen, try again mate
This topic does not belong in a random thread. Random thread is for random topics.
Oh wait...
...
>are you going to provide a source of ANY kind or are we supposed to just take your word for it?
I suppose I need to prove that water is wet.
If you don't believe me you can use Google.
I ain't yo mammy, responsible for yo edukayshun
truth is bait?
okay
Where's that label where you don't give a shit either way because no matter what happens I'm still getting to work tired every morning.
>Tldr: doesn't give a shit either way doesn't effect real life
Post some studies
>multiple studies confirm
>doesn't cite any studies
>still gay
No but when you claim something is factual the burden of proof is on you dumbass
Can we please put Bruce Jenner in that category?
OP faggot confirmed
>No but when you claim something is factual the burden of proof is on you dumbass
You're forgetting two things:
1) You're not paying me. I owe you nothing.
2) See #1
What I said is true. It's your choice if you want to do the work I already did or not. Don't expect to be served on a silver platter.
I already helped you out by telling you that there are multiple studies about this and by summarizing the findings.
My finding is that you're a retard. It's on you to prove you're not a retard because I have a study that says so
I've summarized here. Do some work. Retard
Was that the studies where they didn't take into account that arousal and disgust both result in the same readings?
Arguments without evidence can be dismissed without evidence, try again. He who makes the claim has the duty to provide evidence for their claim.
Ok I can't find any so I guess your full of crap
By that logic... Homosexuality is a defect. You can't disprove me because there are multiple sources. I won't tell them to you. Find them yourself. If you can't find them you're just not looking hard enougj
>can't use Google
>science doesn't exist
the disgust excuse is absurd
you are legitimately retarded. how do you not understand the basics of persuasion?
You could have linked some studies instead of typing all of that shit.
>the disgust excuse is absurd
It's human biology, you fucking retard.
it's ridiculous to claim that normal sexual arousal, boning up, is caused by disgust for normal people
maybe if you're saying homophobes are freaks you'll have a point
normal people lose their boner when they're disgusted by something
it's a typical tactic guys use to prevent unwanted erection or to get them to go away (think about something gross)
The disgust excuse is just as transparent as the claim that when male animals fuck it's "just a display of dominance"
anything people can do to avoid the truth
>it's ridiculous to claim that normal sexual arousal, boning up, is caused by disgust for normal people
Actually, all the studies you didn't link to agree with me. They even have "Faganon is wrong and Straightanon is right" in the name.
Prove me wrong by linking to them.