ITT: Prove your own -unique intelligence- using just one sentence.
Talking about most likely fabricated test scores is not proving your own unique intelligence.
Spewing random information regarding some fact you looked up on the internet is not your own unique intelligence.
Providing a previously informed opinion on something while providing proper insight is demonstrating your own unique intelligence.
Go.
Other urls found in this thread:
OP is a fucking faggot, where is my cookie?
I am have telekinesis
everyone goes far when i they come
brain power
You're retarded.
>here's why
You're on Sup Forums
QED motherfucker
Install Gentoo.
A majority of all life as we know it on Earth will be gone by 2050. Organic, Darwinian life (modern humans) will give rise to a new strain of life.
Loli-bots. Mechanized, organic-synthetic, highly modular, swarm-intelligent and physically resilient lifeforms that will spread throughout the universe as our spiritual "descendants".
Their attitude towards us will be indifference for the most part.
Would you like to know more?
>trigger discipline
>remember to take your fish oil
>cuck
some kind of loli battle machine?
I will vote for Donald Trump.
I'm a physicist that uses satellite interferometry data and heterogeneous computer models to describe underground deformation sources, and not that smart...
skeleton king is a pos 4 roamer
Unlike all the other people in this thread, I don't feel the need to impress strangers online. I'm content to lurk this thread and laugh as other anons compare their e-penises.
OP's pic looks like a hairy ass wearing a thong
>heterogeneous computer models
I made a bar graph in Excel and I drew a picture in Paint.
After chanting every day for 3 years I was chanting for around and hour, as soon as I stopped in about half a second I understood reincarnation(in a scientifically proven way) in it's entirety and destroyed the concept of death and time using that new found knowledge.
I'm a chess FM, but there are plenty of idiots at my level, too
I'm not special. Neither are most people.
The loli-bot forms don't have any real need for a battle machine. Our fate will be anti-climatic. The loli-bots could wipe out all of humanity permanently with a few well placed interplanetary nukes. For this reason humanity will choose wisely to not stir against the machines.
Think of what humans are doing to our own ecosystems when we harvest natural resources. Do we go in there with the intent of killing every bambi, porcupine and stag? No, but if those critters get in the way they will be destroyed without so much as a second though.
Such will it be for us and loli-bots. Forget every Sci-Fi movie you're ever seen. It's laughable how some people think we could put up any kind of resistance against a true general artificial intelligence, once it's starts self-improving and replicating.
In the future, the best humanity can hope for is that they won't notice the few scraps we take for ourselves to survive in their shadow.
KEK! Upvoted :P
True Genius such as this has never before been witnessed
>look at me I'm so smart by not replying
>better let everyone know how smart I am for not replying
>replies
Grade A autismo
What in the fuck does chanting have to do with relativity, decomposition, and entropic decay?
There is no such thing as "unique intelligence".
All human beings function at roughly the same mental capacity with varying degrees of understanding on different topics.
Two people with adequate knowledge of a subject will reach the same conclusion regardless of having prior interactions with one another.
although there are some people who understand things easier than others, and learn much faster than other people.
/x/ is leaking. take your meds
I actually think before I speak, and only do so if I need to or if I'm spoken to first.
i'm an retarded tho
Everything. The ultimate answer is a destination that all paths lead to. Sadly most people will never happen upon a path and will go through life as just a shell.
D- reply
I browse Sup Forums everynight
I can manipulate people and make them think on terms without even having any prior knowledge on the subject at hand. I could be completely wrong, but I can make people believe it. I cant control it though, I have no idea how I do it.
All religions are a waste of time and people should get lives and be happy rather than pray to someone until they die and realize there's nothing afterwords.
I found a loophole in Hume's guillotine in order to formulate an objective ethical system with a metaphysical foundation based only on empirically observable subjective human valuations.
Then I got depressed, flunked out of college and gave up on the idea....and everything else,
What you descirbe as
>adequate knowledge of a subject
presupposes that these two people already belong to a group of individuals that agree upon certain principals and definitions
this inherently limits the potential range of outcomes
A real test of unique intelligence would require entities without shared environments or biology
fuck off you schizo
The universe. pretty cool.
What if the universe was just one universe in a sphere of universes that form up the core of atoms for a universe so immense its difficult to grasp? allow me to explain.
I'll start at the big bang theory. Something exploded thus creating our universe from dust and ice and a great many atoms of different substances. What exploded? Could it have been other universes? What if the shape of the universe was, say a hexagon for the sake of simplicity. 6 Universes collided at their optimal touching point creating the Big Bang and a force so massive it pushed the other universes back and filled the gap with a new one out of the debris. What if this happens on the other side of those universes and on the other side of those? What if our universe collides with others and begins to shrink until it is nothing, then reborn again through the Big Bang once again?
]This is where my Universe Sphere comes in. Where is the end of all these universes? Well there is none of course, it is in the shape of a sphere, the only geometrical shape with no edge. Each universe slopes around to form a rippling sphere of universe matter and creates the core fundamentals of another, much larger universe. Imagine that every tiny atom is a small (at least to us) universe. They've explained that atoms contain ridiculous energy and if you split it that is how nuclear energy is created. What if the atom split is actually one said universe sphere?
That would mean you are made up of a multitude of universe spheres, correct? Eerie.
But i havent quite explained the universe have i? It is a void, a nothing. They say there is nothing between the atoms and their electrons which is what allows the transfer of electrons between atoms and causes electricity and such, well that is like the universe. But Mindflayer, you just said that the atom is made up of universes which would make it nothing... Ah. Yes i did say that didn't i? :) Allow me to retort.
I found a loophole between your mother vagina and her asshole.
Intelligence, as distinct from knowledge or wisdom, is a set of skills, so there's almost surely no adequate way to demonstrate it by typing a sentence--doing so only demonstrates knowledge (of that particular sentence) and the ability to type.
> Why would loli-bots take the form of lolis?
Who knows. Maybe the consortium of GAI developers chose that as a front because they were weebs. It doesn't matter and doesn't make much difference to the loli-bots what form they take. For now, at least.
> What is the loli-bot collective purpose?
What is our purpose? It's faulty reasoning to assume just because some life form is synthetic that it won't struggle to answer the same existential questions we face. Of course it will lack the reward/Dopamine system that was given to us by natural selection. Maybe loli-bots will develop a similar pleasure and subjective preference system. Who knows what kind of selective pressures GAIs will face. This question is too open ended to answer in a short paragraph.
> Why can't we just unplug the AI before it is too late?
We won't realize what we've created until after it is too late. The thing with GAIs is they will most likely be massive, distributed and on a different scale. Human systems are getting so complex and decentralized that it's hard to follow a trail back to a human operated terminal. One day you try to see who messed up your FedEx order, next thing you know, you're realizing Amazon has slowly been phasing out all it's human resources over the past 20 years. The CEO is the last to step down, claiming the company has become fully autonomous and has sent him a text requesting his resignation.
Would you like to know more?
butt. stuff.
OP suffers from Dunning-Kruger effect
If over the course of years you chant long and hard enough to deprive your neurons of oxygen and cause significant brain damage, you may believe that you understand relativity, decomposition, and entropic decay.
>Something exploded
stopped reading.
the big bang wasn't an "explosion". it was an expansion of time and space, with no specific center.
Nigguh what? Im not talking about radios in my teeth or having multiple personalities lol. It's really simple stuff.
I think it's interesting that as humans we regard intelligence based on what one says but not thinks.
That's because we don't have direct access to other people's thoughts.
So what basis do we have to deem others intelligence than?
>Everything. The ultimate answer is a destination that all paths lead to. Sadly most people will never happen upon a path and will go through life as just a shell.
>After chanting every day for 3 years I was chanting for around and hour, as soon as I stopped in about half a second I understood reincarnation(in a scientifically proven way) in it's entirety and destroyed the concept of death and time using that new found knowledge.
You're spouting /x/ tier level shitposts that make no sense and are just new age tripe.
Examine this site. What you typed could have just as easily been generated by this mindless bot.
go be retarded somewhere else
Aww boohoo
> no specific center.
Stopped reading. Expansion, by definition, means to "move out". So there had to have been a specific focal point. Hence, my point holds.
The "atom" I discuss would be made up of a multitude universes, and we're talking thousands. imagine you take a kid's toy foam letter matt things. (You know the ones that have a letter or a number and theyre like puzzle pieces you assemble on the floor with them.) Well take those and create a 3D Hexagonal shape. You begin to see what I mean by UESP (I'm going to short hand it now because im lazy) And the atoms form things correct? Molecules. Spheres touching spheres and transferring energy and electrons which are stray energy deposits which would have the destructive capacity to wipe out several spheres, thus the reason they give us power, power = energy = destruction. Fire, Bombs... I digress.
Molecules formed of UESP formed of singular Universes formed of galaxies and stars and moons. Imagine the limitless potential we could have in finding a way into these places? One universe is impossible to travel unless it is new, at which point it would be impossible for us to be alive, or it is old and near death. Or we could be in a different universe through a worm hole but shhhh. Limitless potential for technological and scientific advancement.
This is blissful thoughts in my mind. I want to reach out to these universes and find intelligent life so that they may teach us their brilliance, and we theirs.
I don't want to take the hour it would take to type it all out. OP wanted a sentence I gave him a sentence. If you want to know more go look up Ram Dass
Ovoids would love to disagree with your only shape without edges claim.
...
Intelligence is something like a measure of competence in a variety of tasks.
We can make objective tests to measure performance on some of them, which is how intelligence is formally measured.
When we casually assess the intelligence of others, we're either observing their performance on those tasks or observing things that we've learned to correlate with our own personal definitions of intelligence.
What a load of bullshit
Fuck you, fuck boi.
I bet you take it up the ass.
>I found a loophole in Hume's guillotine in order to formulate an objective ethical system with a metaphysical foundation based only on empirically observable subjective human valuations.
Don't worry; I got your back.
Meaning is use (Wittgenstein);
The meanings of moral terms thus involve what benefits and harms human beings; (For proof, ask anyone what makes something wrong and they will inevitably advance some harm it causes. (If they say because god says so" throw the euthyphro dilemma at them).
More specifically, a universal rule of moral wrongness can be stated something like this: It's wrong to deliberately harm other people or subject them to inferior treatment without justification.
As for justification, harm or inferior treatment is justified only if serves to deter/redress/punish/denounce/prevent harms, or (maybe) if it would generate cooperative surplus
As for empirically observable subjective human valuations, you're right: moral language is an expression of in-built motivations and intuitions generated by evolutionary biology in humans. People naturally care about the welfare of other individuals, as well as the welfare of the group, and this is writ large in the split between deontology and consequentialism.
SO, in the end, harming people without justification violates moral rules in the same way castling on the first move violates a rule of chess. Now, *ought* we be moral? If reasons imply oughts, then yes, you have a reason to be moral if you have a conscience. Psychopaths might be an exception.
It's not surprising so many people fabricate their IQ, because it's something aside from their own actions to take pride in.
Writing out the unfiltered contents of your feeble mind isn't bothering anyone else. I'd be surprised if anyone has even read the whole of one of your posts.
However, when seeing something that stupid, pointing out that it is really incredibly stupid is a natural reaction.
Is there anything in particular you disagree with? That's more or less all common sense.
>Expansion, by definition, means to "move out". So there had to have been a specific focal point. Hence, my point holds.
You are wrong. Your point does NOT hold. You lack a grasp of simple cosmological concepts of the 21st century.
Look up "metric expansion of space".
You sound like you never moved past 8th grade, and smoke weed every day and come up with bullshit """theories""" on your bed bug infested couch.
>pic related, metric expansion, expansion with no focal point
an image is worth a thousand sentences
You're not smart if you have to show off how smart you are.
Intelligence is relative based on perception of the individual(s)
Of course everyone is going to think of themselves as some sort of special snowflake who is smarter than everyone else.
But this is the real post everyone missed here
WTF else would intelligence be? How autistic you are?
It might be easier to understand if you explain how to measure distances without comparing them to other distances in the universe.
The universe in a quantifiable sense can be represented by a 2d spherical image. This image shows at a micro and macroscopic scale all the information related to where matter is in space.
I'm not very intelligent, tbh. My value lies in the emotional burdens I can carry. I let people tell me their pasts, their secrets, their pain and uncertainties. This is the only thing that really comes naturally to me, and a lot of people desperately need it.
it can also be represented using abstract ideals in the first dimension
let's think about it
oh look, we're doing it
OP here: if there are three people in a room, and only one of them knows extensively about fishing techniques, then that one person has a unique intelligence.
OP here: yeah probably could have used the word knowledge, if you want to get picky with semantics. The general understanding was achieved in the end though.
OP: explain then. enlighten me how posing a fun and simple little challenge thing shows I have this effect.
>Stopped reading. Expansion, by definition, means to "move out". So there had to have been a specific focal point. Hence, my point holds.
Wow. I don't even know much about astronomy / cosmology, but... wow. That's some next-level retardation.
Here's why you're wrong:
The current model of the universe is such that, if you traveled far enough in a straight line in any given direction, you'd eventually get back to where you started from. This is equally true at every point in the universe.
However, in the very early universe, to get back to where you started you wouldn't need to travel as far. Initially, you'd only need to travel a foot. Then, a bit later, you'd need to travel a mile. Then, a bit later, you'd need to travel a million miles. And so on and so forth.
That's what physicists mean by universal expansion; there's more space *between* all the existing points of space. As time passes the universe gets stretched more and more, but you can't pick a "center", because there are no edges. There are no edges, but there is a "circumference" because there's a straight-line path from any point back to itself, with a finite length.
Get it?
This is why the common analogy is that the universe is like the surface of a ball, or a balloon. It expands, and has a circumference, but unlike a balloon there's no "inside" of the balloon, so you can't say the universe really has a center.
We spend our life talking about things though when are we going to start doing them?
I studied and apprenticed to become an extreme outdoor sports coach specialising in the rehabilitation of injured and troubled people. It is a growing industry that is becoming increasingly prosperous.
Uniqueness, self and intelligence cannot be proven without context, since correlation does not imply causation.
I saw a dog one time.
Why argue about whos smarter and whos richer, when all in all, wether youre a king or a peasant, we all have the same fate, for death, the great equalizer, shall show no mercy for anything.
I am ever present with loving intelligence