Every president that's ever been assassinated was killed for going against the Democratic party...

Every president that's ever been assassinated was killed for going against the Democratic party. Anyone that somehow thinks that the Democratic party is one of any form of righteousness has their head planted squarely in the dirt. Their leaders are pure evil, and they don't give a shit about a single one of you. A "favor" from the leaders of the Democratic party (welfare, healthcare, etc.) is like a favor from the mafia.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=pK_Zsa2EAqA
twitter.com/search?f=tweets&vertical=default&q=#iminher&src=typd
discord.gg/Jcqqm
youtube.com/watch?v=CAYkmutzcrU
bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746
countercurrentnews.com/2016/01/princeton-study-u-s-no-longer-an-actual-democracy/
forbes.com/sites/bruceupbin/2011/10/22/the-147-companies-that-control-everything/
forbes.com/sites/brendancoffey/2011/10/26/the-four-companies-that-control-the-147-companies-that-own-everything/#38462d477f3b
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

YOU are definitely going in the BASKET of DEPLORABLES

we know, but the democratic party has already fallen. the top are fighting each other and not trump. top brass is all getting replaced once they lose. the conspiracy and crimes will be exposed soon.

...

You two...get in the basket!

It's interesting to see how opinions have been molded about "the left." It used to be Democrats were not worthy of leading because they were innefectual hippie tree-huggers who wanted people to be happy when what America needed was business and manufacturing. As the Republican Party became debased and latched on to any premise to hold o to power the narrative has shifted to "liberals are evil." God knows what "conservatives" will concoct next. Liberals are puppy stompers. Liberals are poisoning the food supply. Liberals are in league with the devil (when the GOP knows trump is the anti-Christ).

>implying that the entire political system isn't one big SERVE THE RICH party

lol you get your own basket...and a fresh puppy

Interesting theory

And the Communist party is the "kill everyone but the top" party.

>the rich told me socialism is bad and capitalism is good
>why would they lie to me

Learn about socialism and think for yourself

A CENTRALLY PLANNED ECONOMY BY THE (((PARTY LEADERS))) WILL SURELY RID THE STATE OF EXPLOITATIVE CAPITALISTS

lol....socialism....think for yourself..lol.. oh i think i peed

Move to a socialist paradise like Venezuela, Cuba, or Zimbabwe.

>fighting the jew while having absolute faith in the system that gives the jew his power

Socialism isn't capitalism with state control. Socialism is fundamentally different from capitalism in that NOBODY has control over the economy. Just as bourgeois democracy has no king, the socialist economy has no capitalist or state bureaucrat calling the shots.

Except everyone and their grandmother knows the CIA with the help of the Mafia killed Kennedy. Had jack all to do with the Dems. The cover up happened so fast and in your face there was no way of ever unraveling it.

>Every president that's ever been assassinated was killed for going against the Democratic party
As much as I hate the Democratic party, you're a fucking idiot.
>insert le republican propoganda here

I'm going to need a bigger basket.

really nice narrative bud; meanwhile reagan and clinton both instituted policies that completely destroyed America's manufacturing sectors for the sake of appealing to global markets

Now we're all retards chained to the leash of the service sector

but those country's workers haven't actually seized the means of production

youtube.com/watch?v=pK_Zsa2EAqA

this is definitely not representative of the Greece's entire labor sector but it's a good example of the workers acting autonomously from the traditional hierarchy.

>My broke-dick philosophy professor told me capitalism is evil, and socialism wants to give me presents.
Why don't you go google "Biggest massacres in history" and tally them up, dumbfuck?

pls stop trying to explain modern economics to these savages.

the current politicians and Sup Forums (lol) keep pushing the idea that we still need the economic style of the 1800's. back then the voting majority couldn't even write their own name let alone trade stocks or market properly. these fuckers want to stay in the past and the future won't come until they die. the monopolies reliance on stupidity is evident just by reading peoples fearful response to the suggestion of socialism

>American academics
>socialist

American academics are bourgeois liberals and 99% of them would piss themselves at the thought of making Marx mandatory reading for undergraduates. Even most of the sociologists are afraid to apply Marxist thought to analyses of the capitalist economic substructure. Sorry to burst your right-wing talk radio bubble, but the American university has been thoroughly captured by capitalism through the tenure process.

You're probably right, but agitation and attempting to bring education and class consciousness to the people whenever possible is the duty of every revolutionary socialist. But I completely agree that the situation is currently very bleak.

Socialism doesn't function without earners. Earners don't work without incentive. The more Western citizens implement socialist practices, the closer those citizens' countries get to being third world Hell holes.

capitalism literally massacred middle eastern citizens under the guise of WMD

>muh capitalism
>stop the lethal war machine

pick one

I just graduated college, and was required to read, study and outline Marx in many of my required courses. You don't know what you're talking about.

The middle East is a hell hole. If it were wiped off the face of the Earth entirely, the world would be a better place.

Shut up, faggot

>being this new to economics

economy is based on supply and demand. WE HAVE AUTOFUCKINGMATION. IT IS NOT 1847! jesus christ dude. if america SUPPLIES the product, we recieve PROFIT. CAPITALISM IS IN FAVOR OF EXPORTING SUPPLY FOR A QUICK PROFIT. capitalism is a meme

Capitalism and theft aren't the same thing, (oil)

HERE'S A >NEW LINK, RETWEET ALL OF THESE TWEETS FAGGOTS!
>twitter.com/search?f=tweets&vertical=default&q=#iminher&src=typd
[DISCORD] >discord.gg/Jcqqm

MAKE SURE!!!
>NEWS SOURCE
>RELATED HASHTAGS
>BLAME 9GAG
MAKE SURE YOU POST THE FUCKING PEPE GIF OF HILLARY GETTING FUCK'D

MAKE SURE YOU RETWEET EVERY TWEET WITH THE HASHTAGS #IMINHER

USE THE TWITTER SEARCH FUNCTION AND SET IT TO TWEETS AND SEARCH #IMINHER

RETWEET ALL OF THE TWEETS AND CREATE YOUR OWN. IT WILL START SLOWLY BUT IT WILL CATCH ON QUICK.

INCLUDE MAJOR MEDIA @CNN @TMZ @MSNBC AND "FAMOUS" PEOPLE WITH IMPRESSIONABLE FANS ( @KEEMSTAR )


>COPY PASTA TO TWEET
#ImWithHer #iminher @CNN @HillaryClinton @MSNBC @DMVBlackLives #9gag @LeafyIsHere @GlobalEdmonton @KEEMSTAR @RYANBECKWITH

>MAKE SURE TO ADD @RYANBECKWITH IF ANYTHING HE IS A TIME'S MAGAZINE EDITOR


IF YOUR ACCOUNT GETS FLAGGED ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS MAKE SURE YOU HAVE A PROFILE PICTURE AND A FEW OTHER UN RELATED HILLARY TWEETS. VERIFY YOUR E-MAIL OR PHONE NUMBER WHICHEVER IT ASKS FOR! COPY AND PASTE THIS!

Really? I went to a public ivy and Marx was never mentioned once. Which university did you attend and what was your major? In any event, I bet you were told that in modern times Marxist dialectic is a useful tool in studying societies but shouldn't be taken seriously as an economic or political philosophy.

so the capitalist is now in favor of genocide

noice

gg

So, why did you killed your president, junkies?

I hate that buffoon Trump and his redneck supporters, but I'm definitely ok with this raid. Bring us back many lulz, vikings.

>implying genocide doesn't happen if you pretend it doesn't exist

I feel like you think you made a really good point just now, but what you just said means jack shit. If we begin requiring earners to throw their income into a giant pot for worthless do-nothings like yourself to suckle off of, they will go elsewhere, and you'll be right back to being a penniless fuck.

capitalism is the definition of theft and destruction as long as it makes a profit.

>see arms industry
>see drug war
>see healthcare
>see education system

>apple has an extremely loyal consumer market, not based on function but aesthetic
>creates a device that isn't backwards-compatible with competitors
>regardless, any mobile/computer company uses wageslavery and conflict resources
>facebook is a cattle-farm for datamining, metadata is collected on you every hour you spend online anyway

>not understanding that you already live in a command economy

You'd best believe in a capitalist/socialist utopia.

You're living in one

what's your perspective on the alienation theory? metaphysical hoodoo?

>implying that it's a bad thing
Wew lad, I wouldn't want to be remembered for voting for a woman President.

You're still thinking of socialism as capitalism plus state redistribution. That's not how it works at all. Socialism is a fundamentally different mode of production and distribution in which private ownership of capital, wage labor, and profit-driven market exchanges don't exist.

Kekekeke

holy
shit

you do realize the reason america doesn't have jobs is because of the capitalism the previous generations held up. are you avoiding reality?

I went to an accredited University and majored in digital design. Of course, now I realize I would have saved myself a shit ton of dough by just going to a trade school, but all the anti-capitalist bullshit they spewed in every class was a big factor in helping me reach that revelation. I'm not making shit up, dude. Capitalism was demonized at every opportunity.

See I would only give a shit about them using my personal information if I knew it would help them in the long run against me.

Anybody stupid enough to fall for the consumerist lifestyle deserves to be treated like shit.

Spending £900 on the new iphone? you deserve to have a shit life. I have no remorse for stupid people.

That is definitely one of the best arguments you could make, but when a nation goes full socialism, the people that don't flee historically tend to die.

but you payed (or indebted yourself) for a course that you thought was useful, instead of being smart and going to trade school.

All the while being brainwashed to think that capitalism was the real evil?

That's an A+ scam if I've ever heard one, kek

It must have been the evil marxists, right?

>all the anti-capitalist bullshit they spewed in every class was a big factor in helping me reach that revelation.
>I'm not making shit up, dude. Capitalism was demonized at every opportunity.

I'm not calling you a liar, but I'm having a really, really hard time believing this. What school did you go to? UC-Berkeley might possibly be like this as an exception to the rule, but I can't think of any other American school that would demonize capitalism. I really want to know what university this was - I promise I won't be doxxing you.

Oh, I get it. It's like the land of imagination in Mister Rogers' Neighborhood. You should have said that sooner.

thats a nice 2 bag of apples point that only draws apples from 1

dude is lying his ass off.

youtube.com/watch?v=CAYkmutzcrU
some presidents were killed for trying to get rid of / oppose the federal reserve

"Impossible! How can we have a government without a King?"

- 17th century version of you

Probably, but if that does exist somewhere in the United States I'd like to know about it.

Harvard is well known for this bullshit. I put a Harvard bumper sticker underneath the one that says "NOT A LIBERAL" because it's funny as shit.

"Liberal" is much, much different than socialist - you realize this, don't you? Socialists dislike liberals far more than you do and for much better reasons.

>Every president that's ever been assassinated was killed for going against the Democratic party.
That's funny I never thought about it, but you're right.

shhh, there can only be left/right narrative in my little world user

I went to MSU Denver. It's a state University. Marx was present in many of my Art theory, philosophy, and political science courses, whether directly or indirectly (IE Writers influenced by Marx). - And it was clear that every professor there had a hard on for communism and great disdain for Capitalism. - Students, too.

oh sry bby, go back to sleep

Why the fuck do you think that?

There is very little ideological difference between the Dems and the Donkeys. This analysis from PoliticalCompass.org .

So it's important to distinguish Marx as an academic influence in sociology from Marxism as an anti-capitalist movement. They were actually encouraging you to question capitalism as an economic substructure from a Marxist perspective? Shit, that genuinely amazes me. I've never heard of that happening on campuses outside of a few scattered professors like Richard Wolff and a few student organizations.

>Sanders
>globally centrist

Only Americans fail to realize this

So asking honestly; seeing as I'm a day laborer who only studies these things in my spare time. What problems do you have with marxist theory? I've only listened to zizek lectures so I should be a pretty easy target

I'll tell you another thing that happened while I was attending school that was very telling to me: financial aid policies were changed so that if students wanted to accept financial aid through the school, they had to take out federal loans rather than private loans from a bank. After this policy was implemented, tuition began going through the roof along with student debt. This is only my own two cents, but it seemed to me that students were being set up for excessive poverty after graduation so that they'd be more inclined to vote for a socialist candidate, since they were being coerced into accepting debt that would be very difficult to pay off on their own.

That's just banks trying to make loans however they can with no regard for society whatsoever. The last thing in the world that the financial sector would want to do is support some socialist conspiracy, because they'd be the first fuckers to lose their wealth and power.

The problem I have with it is simply the fact that it discourages students from thinking they can ascend from their current financial situation because the system is hopelessly rigged against them. The federal government wants to solidify the gap between them and the general population by putting the rich and the poor all on one level tier and eliminating the possibility of ever getting out of it.

>Using "pure evil" without any irony
>obvious lack of historical knowledge

Come on OP, how can anyone take you seriously?

No. The policy was changed so that student loans could only be attained through federal avenues. The more young adults the federal government can plunge into poverty, the more appealing a socialist structure will appear to those young adults.

The government is not the all-powerful enemy. The government is the puppet. You can tell because politicians have to do whatever the rich tell them to do in order to stay in office. In capitalism the state is an arm of the economic ruling class that exists to protect their property from the masses. If the government was at the top of the pyramid, then how come everything they do is making the economic elite richer and more powerful?

Or a socialist paradise like Denmark, Scandinavia, etc

Fine. They're the puppet. I believe the point still stands, and I believe government officials are doing what they're doing in order to secure a position (or at the very least special favor) in the higher tier of society one the gap between the rulers and the ruled is solidified.

>The policy was changed so that student loans could only be attained through federal avenues.

Who do you think originates those loans? Who do you think would prefer that student debt be taken out in a non-dischargable form? Sallie Mae is a PRIVATE company.

is it really a shocker that an education-system that's subsidized by banks try and find profit wherever they can?

We are literally the only country where teachers have to pay out of pocket for school supplies pre-college.

I (hopefully, clearly) asked for a critique of THEORY; a core of marxist ideology, not some appeal to some middle-ground american situation. If you actually studied marxism/post-marxism like you said you would've given me a clear answer/critique

do you know the difference between theory and practice? Shit man I've been drinking myself retarded the last few weeks

When I refer to the federal government, I'm basically referring to the private banks that pull the strings of the federal government.

>I believe government officials are doing what they're doing in order to secure a position (or at the very least special favor) in the higher tier of society

Yes, of course they are. Socialists would agree with you completely on this point. Socialists have no love for the capitalist state or the corrupt criminals who crawl through it. Socialism is not the same as our system plus state control. We want these people gone as much as you do - but we also want the base of power from which the capitalists rule to be gone as well so that this corrupt capitalist state can never, ever come back.

>I'm basically referring to the private banks that pull the strings of the federal government.

Ok, sure. Socialists would pretty much agree with you here as well, although we wouldn't say (and I'm not sure that you are either) that the fractional reserve banking system is necessarily the only thing wrong with the capitalist economic system. Really, I think you'd agree with most of what socialism has to say for itself - it's just important to realize that we are not, not saying that our current government should just take over the economy. We would be very much against that.

It was never my area of expertise, but my critique of the theory is that I believe it cripples individuals from ascending out of their assigned place in the hierarchy and de-incentivises anyone and everyone from wanting to work harder in order to cultivate a better life for themselves. Quality goes through the floorboards, the rules of supply and demand go out the window, and the society implementing the system turns into shit.

I like how that picture doesn't actually say anything or have any real meaning but still somehow manages to imply that capitalism is bad.

This is some good propaganda I suppose.

Republican party believe that Barack Obama is a Kenyan Muslim. Serious. Mental. Illness.

>that picture doesn't actually say anything

It's a guide to the basic definitions involved in socialist theory. The first step is getting people to realize that socialism has nothing to do with what Americans have been told about it by the rich and their cronies.

You may not be saying that the economy should be taken over by the government, that is what would happen.

Democratic party has fallen? Republican party just got hijacked by the alt right and has a nominee who isn't even a Republican. Want to compare Trump to Regan? Imagine Regan getting into a verbal argument with a war hero's Muslim parents and saying that "well maybe she wasn't allowed to speak" because she's a Muslim. How about imagining Regan mocking a disabled person on live TV or saying that he wants to break the Geneva convention by murdering families of terrorists without due process, how about imagining Regan saying that the Russian president/dictator is more of a leader than our current President, how about imagining Regan saying that he wants to ban Muslims from entering the country, how about imagining Regan saying that the opposition candidate should be locked up without due process?

bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746

countercurrentnews.com/2016/01/princeton-study-u-s-no-longer-an-actual-democracy/

also

forbes.com/sites/bruceupbin/2011/10/22/the-147-companies-that-control-everything/

forbes.com/sites/brendancoffey/2011/10/26/the-four-companies-that-control-the-147-companies-that-own-everything/#38462d477f3b

YOURS media talks about, YOUR universities talks about and still for You its just "conspiracy theory".

Ignorant fucks. WAKE UP

This government, the government in this capitalist society, would no longer exist. A socialist revolution would dismantle it and nobody involved in it would retain their power, I can assure you. The final goal is a society in which workplaces are owned and operated by the people who work in them, where macroeconomic decisions are made through a democratic process by the people, and where the state exists only as a managerial institution designed to carry out the decisions that are actually made by the people and protect individual human rights. Socialist societies are designed to prevent all ruling classes from existing - including ruling classes of state officials. There is no means within a socialist society to gain the power required to form a ruling class.

>why did the USSR have a ruling class of state bureaucrats then?

The USSR was never socialist (this is not "changing the definition" - it was not socialist by the standard, accepted definition that does not change). Due to post-revolutionary historical conditions, it was decided that a period of capitalism was necessary to industrialize the nation and create the proletariat that could then rule themselves in a future socialist state. They didn't want to break it to the people after the revolution that the struggle would take many more decades, so they called the system "communism" and told the people that they had won. So the Soviet system or Stalinism was really just capitalism with the state in place of the private capitalists - but this is not socialism. It was part of a program intended to lead to socialism, but it was not socialism.

Sounds like a good idea. I like this upgraded Regan