Is this Marvel's biggest casting misstep yet?

is this Marvel's biggest casting misstep yet?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=-jMruFHTwrY
youtube.com/watch?v=EOn2mAVlRdA
criterion.com/explore/180-brie-larson-s-top-10
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

don cheadle as black iron man

nope. She's pretty and a good actress. If you really expect every actress on capeshit to have a supermodel body with Ecup tits, you might as well stick to cartoons

...

As long as the actress looks like she could kick my ass she'll make a good Carol Danvers.

>so basically anyone is fine

She's not even cast yet you dumbfuck

>26 year old
>looks like she's almost 40
JUST

>implying

This one is terrible too

Fucking liar detected

Scarjo as BW, should have waited for Blunt

Comic book publishers in the 60's, 70's and 80's were taught to draw only beautiful women, strong and with many curves

Perfect Elektra

Why does hollywood hate big boobs?

lol as if you didnt fap 100 times to elodie while watching the latest season of DD edgelord

Literally the only flattering photo of her I've ever seen.

She's hideous user

ugh

Current Captain Marvel is a titless dyke
it's a good casting choice

Except she can't act for shit. Literally the worst regular on The 100. And the fact that most of her cast mates are actually pretty good actors as far as CW TV goes just makes her shittiness stand out more.

Casting a gentile instead of a jew is never a misstep.

>i'm literally gay
ftfy

She must be in a lot of pain taping her dork back like that.

I want Bella to misstep on my balls, if you know what I mean

>titless dyke
>hasn't seen her nudes

What is studios opposition these days to casting attractive people as attractive characters?

Is it sexist or something?

Nah man when she was trying to get Matt to do bad things my dick was literally diamonds

Sorry nigga you gay

Who goes out in public like this? Christ almighty what an attention whore.

must feel great to come out on Sup Forums faggot
also check em

No she's literally ugly

They mistake the sheer overpowering loudness of the far left turbodykes calling out for "realistic" looking women for the majority, who doesn't give a fuck.

I swear they need to stop pandering so hard to these mongoloids.

>Casting based on looks alone

People are THIS retarded, i'm glad none of you will actually do any casting in your lifetime.

Their mommy's yell at them too much now they're scare of women.

Do you live in Saudi Arabia? That would be considered modest compared to what the average slut wears around here, flaunting tits and ass to every stranger and complaining that people sneak looks

What happened to attractive actresses that could actually ACT?

OOO MATT-YEW

>out of the millions of hopeful young actresses in America they could not find a single one who could both look and act the part

Nah, Brie Larson is a good choice. She's a good actress, and doesn't seem like a blonde bimbo so might be somewhat believable as a fighter pilot.

Also, she sluts up well if needed. She was hot as fuck in Scott Pilgrim. Dat version of Black Sheep, yo. Erection-city.
youtube.com/watch?v=-jMruFHTwrY

They never existed for one.

And how do you know what "the part" is? Such nuances are probably lost on you.

I'm honestly ok with this. She's a decent actress and looks like she has potential to be an alright action star.

Tits/Ass don't matter if the actress can play it off, just look at how awesome Ellen Ripley turned out to be.

>And how do you know what "the part" is?

It's an existing character.

>potential
Almost as empty of a criticism as "underrated/overrated."

shit taste detected

And Ellen Ripley was also a Space Pilot aswell.

POETRY

If you look at some comic book versions of Captain Marvel she can sometimes look pretty motherly.

This is directly from marvel.com

No big tits, no fabulous face just a decent to hot looking average woman.

She has nice tits though

>It's an existing character.

An existing character that(from what i understand) has been characterized different ways over the years.

And even if she has had a 100% same characterization from beginning to now that doesn't mean you know how her movie counterpart will be characterized.

>decent to hot looking average
I'm done.

Damn, Elisha Cuthbert would've been spot on

Sure, she's blonde, she's a woman it's perfect.

Looks nothing like Carol.

>inb4 GREATEST ACTRESS OF OUR GENERATION

Yeah okay she's got range and she's expressive and an all around great actress but this is no drama, this is punching aliens in a skintight suit. Like it or not looks matter in capeshit. Aside from that how come all the male actors are required to bust their asses in the gym to look believable as the demigods they portray while all the female ones don't? Why is this acceptable?

I mean potential as in, she looks like she can pull off action scenes, with her fit build.

Just compare her to caloressi queen as sarah connor.
>youtube.com/watch?v=EOn2mAVlRdA

>An existing character that(from what i understand) has been characterized different ways over the years.
Not really. We're not talking about Batman and Superman with almost eighty years of publication history in every medium in hundreds of titles. This is Carol Danvers.

>how her movie counterpart will be characterized
If the movie fails to capture the comic character it's just a shitty adaptation.

>Aside from that how come all the male actors are required to bust their asses in the gym to look believable as the demigods they portray while all the female ones don't? Why is this acceptable?

It's sexist to have the same standards and expectations for women as you do for men.

It doesn't matter what you meant because it's still meaningless. A decent trainer will get anyone who isn't physically disabled or a baby into shape for action movies. Potentially even you could do it, so what? Potentially Rebel Wilson could do it, so what?

An 8/10 actress is still hotter than the hottest woman to have every actually joined the Air Force.

I speak from experience. Slim fucking pickins. You get some hardcore deployment goggles and slum it with some real uggos, man. I've never fucked so many 4/10's in my life.

God damn you transphobic pigs!

:3
Brie a cute

Don't worry, some make-up, camera magic, push-up bra, outfit shaping, etc will whip her into relative Carol shape.

Why cast the character when you can mold a semblance of the character from some cunt?

Turner stands at the other end of the spectrum. She's tall and busty and would look great after hitting the gym for a few months but she can't act for shit.

>If the movie fails to capture the comic character it's just a shitty adaptation.

Guess what? The creators of the movie don't owe you anything. You can call the movie shit based on "comic book faithfulness" alone but i would call that is cheap and shallow criticism. Would it be a shame if the movie had a BETTER version of an established character? Because i feel that comic book fags are so vindictive and protective of "their" fantasy universe they would actively root for the failure of an unauthentic "good" capeshit movie.

too bad she's 5'2"

>Aside from that how come all the male actors are required to bust their asses in the gym to look believable as the demigods they portray while all the female ones don't? Why is this acceptable?
I mean, to play devil's advocate, she can't exactly grow bigger boobs by going to the gym and it's not like brie's overweight in the slightest

>The creators of the movie don't owe you anything.
Which is irrelevant since no one here made that claim.

>ou can call the movie shit based on "comic book faithfulness" alone but i would call that is cheap and shallow criticism
No, since they're attempting an adaptation of material, which means they can pass or fail at doing so making their attempt successful or not and if not then open to valid criticism.

>Would it be a shame if the movie had a BETTER version of an established character?
What so far about a bad casting choice makes you believe that this version of a character which will be featured in a summer blockbuster superhero movie will make it better than its source material?

You sound utterly ridiculous just trying to defend some dumb cunt who bears no resemblance to Carol Danvers for no reason whatsoever. I can't fathom what your interest is in the actress other than possible waifufaggotry. The reality is they easily could select someone who could both look and act the part of the character but instead just go with whoever negotiated well and has some recognizability to the target demographic.

So then don't cast her.

Jenna Fischer?

Ok Mehmet

I stand corrected, I won't use that anymore.

How about, she just has the right body build (slim, tall) to pull off decent action scenes. That good enough?

That's nothing a padded bra and some Hollywood magic can't fix.

How much of the CGI budget will go towards fixing her face?

There's only so much that that can do, and at the end of the day she's still a chestlet.

>No, since they're attempting an adaptation of material, which means they can pass or fail at doing so making their attempt successful or not and if not then open to valid criticism.

Sure, you can absolutely criticize based on some arbitrary standard, i would just call it shallow and cheap.

>What so far about a bad casting choice makes you believe that this version of a character which will be featured in a summer blockbuster superhero movie will make it better than its source material?

I don't know, i haven't seen the movie. I just find flinging shit at casting choices using LOOKS ONLY is beyond fucking stupid.

>I can't fathom what your interest is in the actress other than possible waifufaggotry.

I have no idea who the casted actress is, this is a debate for ALL threads were this kinda of nonsense is flung around.

Her face is just fine. She can pull off assertive/angry with the same ease she can pull off cute. Seriously go watch some of her movies, she's good at her craft.

Sackhoff would've been perfect.

>Sure, you can absolutely criticize based on some arbitrary standard, i would just call it shallow and cheap.
Then you'd just be a retard for thinking anything about it is arbitrary, shallow, or cheap. Why are you even talking about concepts you don't understand?

> I just find flinging shit at casting choices using LOOKS ONLY is beyond fucking stupid.
But I'm not doing that, so, like your other comment, that's also irrelevant. Maybe you should try reading before replying.

>I have no idea who the casted actress is

So literally:
>I have no idea what I'm talking about
>but I am still trying to talk anyway

Thanks for admitting that. I think we're done here then, other than your autism's inevitable need to try to get a last word so go nuts.

I know you're joking but that's actually how society works in the current year. It's sad.

Except nobody knows her so her movie would flop.

But every male capeshit had a super model body...

looks shopped

Blunt is too good for that role.

Young Elektra was perfectly cast.

With Disney's marketing machine behind it? Literally impossible.

Brie Larson confirmed for patrician kinography viewer

criterion.com/explore/180-brie-larson-s-top-10

>Then you'd just be a retard for thinking anything about it is arbitrary, shallow, or cheap.

Right, you're totally correct, please forgive my retardation. Using an unestablished criteria formed around your personal conceptions of how a character should appear and act is a completely reasonable basis for criticism, what was i thinking? Please ignore anyone(who isn't a comic book reader) who might find the film or the character herself as "good", they're clearly uniformed and have ZERO idea of what makes a quality movie.

>Thanks for admitting that

What was I admitting? I don't know who the actress is, all i know is that they cast her for a character in a movie and that people flinging shit because "she doesn't look like the character", which is shallow criticism. I don't give a shit about the actress herself. It doesn't INVALIDATE the criticism either, these people have a point but it's not particularly profound or interesting. You can literally spend weeks talking about the little and big changes adaptations receive but then again a 8 year old child can do the same thing.

does Bella Thorne have any nudes?

>WAAAAAH WIMMINZ GET FREE RIDE BEIN HOT AND FUCKNSUCK WAAAAH
>WAAAAH SHE'S NOT HOT ENOUGH TO BE IN MOVIES WHAT IS THIS WAAAAAH
You are the cause of your own problems. Solution, too, if you're brave enough to pull the trigger on yourself.

You do realize that those two statements can be made by two separate people, right?

Your attempt to point of hypocrisy is pathetic.

>RDJ, ruffalo, tobey maguire, paul rudd,
>supermodels

also, it's easier for a man to bulk up than for a girl to have giant boobs, an incredibly thin waist, non flabby arms, and all the retarded stereotypes of comics

Who is she? I'm not reading this whole thread to find out.

>not Muh-few

>Tits/Ass don't matter
You're right. What matters is Thor taking his shirt off for no reason every 15 minutes and the camera focusing on his abs for 10 minutes.

Fuck. Off.

brie larson. check out fappening

why watch thor in the first place. You knew it was for girls when they added portman as romantic interest, titcow as sidekick, and thor was shirtless like twice IN THE TRAILER

>also, it's easier for a man to bulk up
LONDON
O
N
D
O
N

Also
>Paul Rudd
has won sexiest man
>RDJ
has 100 times more fangirls than Brie Larson has fanboys

did she had her boobs done in a back alley

>LONDON
>O
>N
>D
>O
>N

It literally is you meme-spouting faggot

If it's not Alice Eve they can fuck right off

Alice has the blonde hair, the tits, the ass and the curves, and the kinda of build they can just add more muscle to.

>You knew it was for girls
so what movies do you recommend for me to get some fanservice out of that isn't a retarded Michael Bay movie or a F&F movie?

RDJ was nobody before ironman but a hasbeen. brie larson might as well become the new jennifer lawrence if this movie works. I wouldn't mind that desu

>who bears no resemblance to Carol Danvers

Carol Danvers is a fictional character who looks vastly different depending on who's drawing her. Look at OP's pic and then . Hell in pic related she looks fucking Asian.

Some dude in this thread said Elisha Cuthbert. Okay, her face kind of looks like the art in OP's pic but she doesn't have anywhere near the tits, which according to this thread is suddenly a prerequisite for the character of Carol Danvers. A lot of people used to say Katee Sackhoff would be perfect and I think she would be a good fit for , but then she doesn't look like the other two. Do you get it? There's no one actress for these roles. At the end of the day Marvel or DC or anyone making comic book movies has to make a decision, and Larson is an attractive (if you think she isn't that's on you) blonde woman in her mid-20s, a good actress, and allows Disney/Marvel to say they've got another Oscar winner working for them. Makes perfect sense that they'd go after her.

>talking shit about my waifu

fuck off DCucks and pedos