Can we all agree that political music is garbage...

Can we all agree that political music is garbage? Especially in recent times where it's basically all biased toward the left.

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=CuzpFMWReZw
m.youtube.com/watch?v=vLGFyxAP0QE
m.youtube.com/watch?v=vPRfP_TEQ-g
youtube.com/watch?v=tH4p_MX4YG8
vanityfair.com/news/2017/01/donald-trump-polls-least-popular-president-elect
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

The song isn't political

>And I thought the best way to perfect our tree,
>Is by building walls.
>Rose like unicorns,
>In full glory and galore.
>And even stronger than the walls of Jericho,
>Glad then my friend let in the few we shall reap a grand idea,
>Of what we have always dreamt of having,
>Now for the starving,
>It is love,
>And that is the root of all evil,
>But not our tree, and thank you my friend,
>For trusting me.
it's completely political and hits you over the head with it too

Rightards are too stupid to make music. All they care about is GUNZ and MUH TRADITIONAL VALUES

Those cucks think they can insult the God Emperor? They'll never have a band as iconic as Three Doors Down or Kid Rock on their team. Boy I love drinking libtard tears while making America great again.

>Can we all agree that opinions I disagree with are garbage
literally you

all music is political

I guess that Bob Dylan's songs are all garbage according to you. Frank Zappa's songs too.

No. Shut the fuck up, triggered Sup Forumsfaggot.

>gorillaz makes kids with guns
MAN THIS IS SO GOOD
>anti trump song
WTF THIS IS BAD STOP ATTACKING MY SHITTY PRESIDENT REEEEEEEEEEEE

>Can we all agree that political music is garbage?

so what you're saying is

>Can we all agree that political music that doesn't agree with my personal political views is garbage?

it's best to seek approval on reddit

but Kids With Guns was a solid pop song. This is... something. I'm sure it'll click eventually.

>gorillaz makes kids with guns
Man, this sucks.
>anti trump song
Man, this sucks.

>"stop having opinions i don't like!!!!!!"
funny how the "we don't need safe spaces" crowd expects everything to pander to them and not challenge them

Music that puts the political bullshit before the actual music is garbage.
If the music itself is good I don't care about how much I agree or disagree with the lyrics.

This was AOTY 2016 so idk what you're talking about

This song plain sucks and this guy looks like a spooky aids victim

Just watched this shit and the first thing I thought, was 'I bet some butthurt Sup Forumsedditors will be whining about this on Sup Forums' and lo and behold I find this on the front page.

Jej, tfw babbies can't even into some catchy hip-hop base level politicore.

This is a great album though

its biased towards the left because being biased towards the right is completely retarded, and no one would buy that shit.

You are a retard.

Right wing ideology is inherently incompatible with any kind of art, but particularly music.

>Presidential candidate I approve of gets elected
>he's politically unpopular
>me: YO TIME OUT ON POLITICAL MUSIC
>YO CAN WE AGREE FUCK POLITICAL MUSIC
>TIME OUT
>TIME OUT TIL IT'S SOMEONE I DON'T LIKE

I'm glad I'll never be this retarded

But you're already on Sup Forums m8

this desu
I listen to music for the music not about some political shit I don't care about

I'd like it a bit more if it wasn't so blatantly anti-right

so it violates your safe space

Both of those fags are garbage though

Stop worshipping Jews

He's not unpopular though, you're fucking retarded

BREAKING NEWS

MOST ARTISTS ARE LEFTIST

MORE IN THE NIGHT EDITION

Make me neckbeard

And Zappa was an Italian

Right wing stands for traditionalism and capitalism

Postmodernism leaked into popular music

A right winger who listens to free jazz or krautrock suffers cognitive dissonance as those are communist and Anarchist ideologies

yeah I do
m.youtube.com/watch?v=CuzpFMWReZw
m.youtube.com/watch?v=vLGFyxAP0QE
m.youtube.com/watch?v=vPRfP_TEQ-g
m.youtube.com/watch?v=vLGFyxAP0QE

think again, cuck

youtube.com/watch?v=tH4p_MX4YG8

>never listened to Dead Kennedys
>never listened to Manic Street Preachers

Right wing and left wing are essentially meaningless at this point, and I'm surprised that people keep using the terms. They are so general and changing that you might as well avoid them entirely.

Do you have anything to back this up?

He won enough votes to become the president of the united states.

Not him but I'm excited to hear you cite the same vein of sources that all predicted a Hillary win

waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Tim is a meme

Next he's going to cite the percentage out of the whole population rather than eligible voters who casted their votes in order to frame things as negatively as possible. It's their talking point lately.

lol what should music be about then?

Pretty much half of America liked him enough

he literally lost the popular vote.

He's literally the most unpopular president to ever be elected in modern history. He didn't even win the popular vote against a fucking potato. I don't care if you support Trump, but don't you don't have to be even more retarded than you probably already are.

>Postmodernism leaked into popular music
No it didn't.

except for the fact that many, many people align themselves staunchly one way or the other. your average 65-year-old voter doesn't give a shit about the nuances of personal politics when their entitlements are on the line.

He lost the popular vote by over 3 million votes (the most in history for a president), is the most unpopular presidential candidate to win an election since the 19th century, and is the least popular major party nominee in modern history. He's taking office with the lowest approval rating for any non-incumbent president in history, and he's the first Republican President in history not to be endorsed by his predecessors.

Also, almost no popular musicians want to play his inauguration, and as evidenced by this thread, he's on track to inspire all the top albums of 2017 to be anti-Trump albums.

Kind of reminds me how leftards during their brief period of blaming the hillary loss on 3rd party voters, arrogantly assumed that if they didn't vote 3rd party they "obviously" would've voted hillary.

If they liked hillary so much then they would've voted for in the first place.

Sorry but popular vote means shit. Trump had the most EVEN DISTRIBUTION of votes among the states, that's why he won. It works that way because we don't want mexicans who flood into california and have 18 bazillion children screwing up the vote results.

I mean, I get that you decide whether or not you trust a source based on whether or not it agrees with you, but

vanityfair.com/news/2017/01/donald-trump-polls-least-popular-president-elect

Actually 26.73% of eligible voters voted for him on election day. Which still doesn't even mean that each voter that decided Trump liked him.

Yes, but this song is garbage regardless of the message as well.

>the corrupt and greedy elites hate a candidate
>this is a bad thing

Holy shit lmao

I refuse to use the terms. They are way too simplistic and divisive. Political affiliation is incredibly complicated and the idea that it can be summed up in two categories is fucking retarded/

>popular vote means shit

actually it's a pretty good indication of, if nothing else, popularity, which is what we're talking about

Uh huh, and tell the class how that percent compares to his opponent and the outgoing president. Go ahead, tell us user. Surely you're not leaving out vital context on purpose.

You are fucking retarded. California has not gone red since Reagan (his home state), and probably never will again. So, stop being an ignorant fuck.

>the corrupt and greedy elites

you literally support a billionaire president who shits on a golden toilet, refuses to put his assets in a blind trust, refuses to release his tax returns, likely hasn't paid taxes in ten years, appointed friends and family to cabinet positions, and is well on track to be the most corrupt and greedy elite in the oval office in the history of the united states

The context is Trump's popularity you dumbfuck. You stupidly imply that I have some absurd Clintonite motive by pointing out that Trump is a pile of shit that no one likes.

>trumpfags literally triggered by a song

i get where you're coming from, and i'm not policing your language. i'm just saying that for many "right wing" and "left wing" still hold a lot of weight.

let's not even delve into the possibility that words can change meaning over time (gasp). the bottom line is that the west is extremely politically divided. you can call it left vs. right, bip vs. bop. i don't give a shit, but you can't ignore that there is about half of the western world who thinks you're an idiot for your beliefs, no matter what.

Right and your comment shows me that you don't know who "The Elites" are. If we were on their side, they wouldn't have spent the past year and a half conspiring against him and railing against him.

When the media, political establishment and intelligence agencies are all on the same side against a person, he is not in the in crowd that myself and anyone else is talking about besides low info voters.

I agree but you're forgetting that people are literally afraid of saying that they like trump because they'll be lambasted as raycis, trannyphobic, muh soggy knees and all the other buzzwords people throw around. This is why all of the predictions about hillary winning were wrong.

>I'm supporting a corrupt and greedy elite for candidate and hate corrupt and greedy elites

Holy shit lmao

The current political establishment being against Trump doesn't make him for the people I hope you realize that. Trump is an elite, and denying that is incredibly naive.

You can be political and still make a good album, it just requires more of a thought and talent

I think you're drastically underestimating how many unaffiliated people are out there. How many people don't want the Democrats or Trump. I'm one of them.

Your refusal to answer speaks volumes. It's a standard percentage for elections, and you're framing it dishonestly. Whether it's because you're lock-step brainwashed where you're an MSM parrot, or shilling on purpose is impossible to know.

>people are literally afraid of saying that they like trump
>he literally believes this

spoiler alert kiddo: you're the only one who's scared, because you're a beta alt-right pussy.

Predictions were wrong because the polling was done incorrectly

I know his wealth qualifies him as an elite, but I've been using The Elites to reference a group within the super rich, it's pretty clear.

I'm not a Trump supporter, you're just a small thinker.

No. You're just a fucking whiner with no ability to critical assess the world around you so you get pissed off when others do.

>Biased towards the left
Yes we really are living in socialist times aren't we!!!

>Not being able to keep a track of what beliefs an anonymous poster has makes you stupid

Holy shit lmao

All music other than this is garbage

Too bad libtards will never have

Giacomo Antonio Perti (1661-1756)
Nicolas Siret (1663-1754)
Michele Mascitti (1664-1760)

cont.

>polling was done incorrectly repeatedly and consistently in a way that reflected negatively on Trump by the same groups who repeatedly were caught conspiring against him

No user, surely it was a total accident. I'm amazed at how easy it is to fool people like you.

That's not why I called you a small thinker, and your ability to only parrot what I say isn't helping your cause. The next comment you won't because I told you to.

Johann Christoph Pepusch (1667-1752)
Johann Nicolaus Bach (1669-1753)
Giuseppe Avitrano (1670-1756)
Louis de Caix d'Hervelois (1670-1760)
Richard Leveridge (1670-1758)
Tomaso Albinoni (1671-1751)
Azzolino della Ciaja or della Ciaia or della Araja (1671-1755)
Georg Caspar Schürmann (1672/1673-1751)
Pierre Dumage (1674-1751)
Jacques-Martin Hotteterre (1674-1763)
Giovanni Porta (1675-1755)
Giacomo Facco (1676-1753)
Wolff Jakob Lauffensteiner (1676-1754)
Giuseppe Maria Orlandini (1676-1760)
Giovanni Carlo Maria Clari (1677-1754)
Ferdinando Antonio Lazzari (1678-1754)
Giovanni Antonio Piani (de) or Jean-Antoine Desplanes (1678-1760)
Manuel de Zumaya (1678-1755)
Jean-Baptiste Stuck (1680-1755)
Johann Mattheson (1681-1764)
Georg Philipp Telemann (1681-1767)
Giuseppe Valentini (1681-1753)
Paolo Benedetto Bellinzani (1682-1757)
Giacobbe Cervetto (1682-1783)
Pietro Baldassare (1683-after 1768)
Christoph Graupner (1683-1760)
Jean-Philippe Rameau (1683-1764)
François d'Agincourt (1684-1758)
François Bouvard (1684-1760)
Francesco Durante (1684-1755)
Francesco Manfredini (1684-1762)
Johann Theodor Roemhildt (1684-1756)
Johann Sebastian Bach (1685-1750)
Giuseppe Matteo Alberti (1685-1751)
Louis-Antoine Dornel (1685-1765)
George Frideric Handel (1685-1759)
Wilhelm Hieronymus Pachelbel (1685-1764)
Domenico Scarlatti (1685-1757)
Nicola Porpora (1686-1768)

"The elites" isn't just one group of people. Trump's not one of them, but he's not one of us either. Look at his cabinet picks and tell me that's not nepotism. He's just power-hungry, and took the opportunity when he saw it.

i'm curious if you're old enough to hold a regular job with working adults. because there are an abundance of people who identify as either left-leaning or right-leaning.

glad to see you're out there saving the world, though. i hope you realize that your being obtuse won't do anything to stop the damage a trump administration will do to america.

>Makes vague posts about an evil elite and thinks people that don't believe him are small thinkers

Holy shit lmao

Giovanni Battista Somis (1686-1763)
Willem de Fesch (1687-1761)
Francesco Geminiani (1687-1762)
Johann Georg Pisendel (1687-1755)
Johann Friedrich Fasch (1688-1758)
Thomas Roseingrave (1688-1766)
Jacques Aubert (1689-1753)
Joseph Bodin de Boismortier (1689-1755)
Pietro Gnocchi (1689-1775)
Francesco Barsanti (1690-1772)
Giuseppe Antonio Brescianello (1690-1758)
Pierre-Gabriel Buffardin (1690-1768)
Fortunato Chelleri (1690-1757)
François Colin de Blamont (1690-1760)
Giovanni Antonio Giai or Giay, Giaj (1690-1764)
Johann Tobias Krebs (1690-1762)
Gottlieb Muffat (1690-1770)
Jacques-Christophe Naudot (1690-1762)
Manuel José de Quirós (1690?-1765)
Francesco Maria Veracini (1690-1768)
Francesco Feo (1691-1761)
Jan Francisci (1691-1758)
Conrad Friedrich Hurlebusch (1691-1765)
Antonio Palella (1692-1761)
Giovanni Alberto Ristori (1692-1753)
Giuseppe Tartini (1692-1770)
Unico Wilhelm van Wassenaer (1692-1766)
Laurent Belissen (1693-1762)
Gregor Joseph Werner (1693-1766)
Louis-Claude Daquin (1694-1772)
Johann Samuel Endler (de) (1694-1762)

I'd rather have a wildcard than rule by the same group that's been in power my entire life. I don't like him either, but I have a small amount of favorability for him over the alternative.

And there are a huge amount of people who don't use those labels, more than not. Maybe you work somewhere that people like to express their political views, but aren't intelligent enough to understand nuance in affiliation.

Almost everyone believes they're a moderate, even if they tell themselves/others they're right wing/left wing to appear as though they've recognised and accounted for their personal biases.

>it's basically all biased toward the left.
>"This music is shit because the artist has different political opinions!"
What exactly does this song have to do with Trump, anyway? From what I could make out it just sounded anti-consumerism.

Pierre-Claude Foucquet (1694-1772)
Johan Helmich Roman (1694-1758)
Johann Lorenz Bach (1695-1773)
Pietro Locatelli (1695-1764)
Marie-Anne-Catherine Quinault (1695-1791)
Ernst Gottlieb Baron (1696-1760)
Pierre Février (1696-1760)
Maurice Greene (1696-1755)
Johann Melchior Molter (1696-1765)
Johann Caspar Vogler (1696-1763)
Andrea Zani (1696-1757)
Josse Boutmy (1697-1779)
Cornelius Heinrich Dretzel (1697-1775)
Adam Falckenhagen (1697-1754)
Johann Christian Hertel (1697/1699-1754)
Jean-Marie Leclair l'aîné (1697-1764)
Giuseppe de Majo (1697-1771)
Giovanni Benedetto Platti (1697-1763)
Johann Pfeiffer (1697-1761)
Johann Joachim Quantz (1697-1773)
Francesco Antonio Vallotti (1697-1780)
Pietro Auletta (1698-1771)
Riccardo Broschi (1698-1756)
François Francoeur (1698-1787)
František Jiránek (1698-1778)
Nicola Bonifacio Logroscino (1698-1764)
Gaetano Maria Schiassi (de) (1698-1754)
Jean-Baptiste Forqueray le fils (1699-1782)
Joseph Gibbs (1699-1788)
Johann Adolf Hasse (1699-1783)
Juan Francés de Iribarren (1699-1767)
Jan Zach (1699-1773)
Charles Dollé (fl. 1735-1755; d. after 1755)
Giovanni Giorgi (fl. from 1719; d. 1762)
Mlle Guédon de Presles (c. 1700-1754)
Michel Blavet (1700-1768)
Sebastian Bodinus (1700-1759)
Domenico Dall'Oglio (1700-1764)
João Rodrigues Esteves (1700-1751)
Nicola Fiorenza (after 1700-1764)
Jean-Baptiste Masse (c. 1700–c. 1756)
Giovanni Battista Sammartini (1700-1775)
Johan Agrell (1701-1765)
François Rebel (1701-1775)
Alessandro Besozzi (1702-1775)
Johann Ernst Eberlin (1702-1762)
José de Nebra (1702-1768)
Francisco António de Almeida (1702-1755)
John Frederick Lampe (1703-1751)
Johann Gottlieb Graun (c. 1703-1771)

Stop pretending like you know my beliefs. The entire percentage was an answer to a stupid comment above me. So it's pretty ironic that you lambast me for taking things out of context. Voter turnout has hit a 20 year low. Trump still lost the popular vote by the largest margin ever to probably the worst candidate in modern history in a climate incredibly favorable to rhetoric he employed. There will be a quarter million people at least that protest his inauguration in DC alone. The fact that you think I'm a shill just shows that you're too lazy to ever have your own worldview questioned.

>he still cannot make a comment without using the exact same format and line as I first used against him
>he is struggling to use reading comprehension
>it's been three responses in a row that he's done this

this

It isn't shit because it's political, it's shit bevause it just sucks.

OP has little grasp as to what "bias" means

Shilling isn't a term only used when people are paid to do it. I was claiming that you were just being dishonest on purpose. Yes user, pointing to percentages of voters as if it portrays extreme unpopularity when it's a pretty standard percentage is misleading. Whether that is you'e ignorance, stupidity or dishonesty is what I don't know.

This is very straightforward.

>aren't intelligent

this is most of america, brother. you aren't a moderate, i promise you.

I am a moderate, you don't know shit. I hold views from both sides and none of them are extreme.

If you work somewhere that everyone explicitly brands themselves as right wing and left wing using those terms, you are not at a normal place. People might use liberal, conservative, republican, democrat, libertarian, even socialist, or they specifically reference politicians they agree with. Right and left wing is far from the most common descriptor.

I recently found out that it's mastered in such a way you're meant to listen to it with the volume a bit higher than normal. I tried it for the first time yesterday and so many new features of the tracks surfaced.

1+ million of hillary's popular vote are from california.
I bet everyone wants california dictating how the whole country runs.

>Especially in recent times where it's basically all biased toward the left.
I can't think of a single good right wing political song.

political lyrics are usually garbage, dead kennedys get away with writing fun / funny ones
it doesnt effect other aspects of the music though

Coincidentally, it's possible for Illegal immigrants to vote in California and they are issued licenses. Not only that, but Obama went on TV and actively encouraged illegals to vote.

Still for some strange reasons, Dems REFUSE to estimate how many illegals voted, branding it as insane conspiracy, despite the fact that our very president encouraged it. What are they hiding, what's the real number who voted?