Let's imagine

Blue vs white
3 countries vs rest of the world
Who will win?
North Korea not sided with anyone due to balance reasons.

nukes destroy everything, nobody wins

Considering only a handful of the white countries have realistic and limited projection capabilities it would only be
>Canada and Mexico (aided by Brazil and company) vs USA
>Europe and Russian border states vs Russia
>Japan, worst Korea and India vs China
Also, everyone with USA bases vs USA
Considering nukes out of the question of course
Countries to far away from blue most likely will only send small garrisons or aid

Let's say only NK can use nukes.

Year 1:
The Triple Entente(Original right) realises their lack of numbers,thus decide to build a wall while facing off small skirmishers from the first attackers(Europeans and Pajeets)
US does not get attacked as there already is a wall between them an Mexico,and Canada decides that if they Kill their enemies they win

more autism to come

Year 2:
North Korea gets impatient,tries to invade Greater Asia(Name for The Russia-China part of the triple entente)
Fails miserably,gets annexed in 6 weeks

Canada decides to ally with the usa but they don't intend to do anything,they formed the alliance for their own protection as someone needs to protect their cuck sheds.

Wall is in its final stage of construction,West Russia facing heavy attacks,and they decided to build a long trench since their workers keep on getting attacked

more to come

Assuming no nukes, i'd say there's no really a way to decide a winner.

Assuming nukes will be used, nobody wins.

Year 3:
Wall completed,by now the Attacks have grown into assaults,daily bombings and repairs on the walls,this is causing the Triple Entente's economy to drop like a Canadian bending for Jamal,they decide to use a desperate measure,Blast walls and Machine gun automated turrets 24/7.

Protests are a daily occurance,Extremist politicians starting to gain ground,the 3 governments have merged into one central government to try and solve the issues of their land but to no avail

more to come

Year 4
Blast walls complete
All assaults are focused on the East Russia Barricade,Triple Entente send 90% of their soldiers there

In Beijing,the Triple Entente Gather to vote whether or not for 'Solution Omega' to proceed,it gets voted in with a unanimous vote

The world was never prepared for Solution omega

So unbalanced.
EU can hold Russia and thats it.

USA & Russia vs. World is a better scenario

very good autism, Sup Forums needs more of this

Year xxxx
Solution Omega has destroyed all world governments and towns,only a select few elite citizens remain,solution omega is as follows:

Ending coming up

SOLUTION OMEGA

BRART
*SNIFF*
QUITE FANCY MY DEAR
IS THAT CURRY I SMELL?
OH,MORE DARLING

BRAPRFTLL
*SNIFF*
OH
HOW UNGRATEFUL,HOW DELIGHTFUL
SMELLS LIKE ROTTEN CHEESE DEAR

What solutiong omega exactly is?

Danke,I have 128 Autism intelligence Standard Deviation 15

Wonderful Ruskie,Wonderful

Wonderful Top Tier story my friend!

a better question is blue vs orange

Blue has like 90% of all nukes.
If we take the nukes out of the question, blue countries are just too big to be invaded by any smaller country. At the same time, blue has the two largest economies in the world plus another huge economic power. Blue has also the only relevant projecting power, blue can invade countries one by one. White can't, the only projecting power white has comes from India, France and Britain which frankly can't win the war by themselves. African and Latin American countries have a lot of resources but their militaries are all very weak, they also have nothing in terms of good tech, logistics, anything.
It would go down something like this:
>>first stage of the war
>US navy takes over the Atlantic as far as Azores/Madeira
>US and Chinese navies take over the Pacific
>Russian navy is destroyed by European navies
>European armies attemp to push into Russia
>India, SEA and Japan attemp to push into China
>US takes over the entirety of the American continent
>Middle Eastern armies are deployed both to southwestern Russia and India
>Africa can't really move its armies around as much as it wanted to because poor as fuck logistics, they mostly just dig in

>>second stage of the war
>american continent is under US control
>China and Russia still taking a good beating, but holding
>US deploys its navy to the coast of Europe, attemping to control the northern sea and the mediterranean
>US landings in Australia, Philippines, Japan, South Korea and Indonesia
>a critial point at which China and Russia must hold their enemies

>>third stage of the war
>If China cannot stand India/Middle East/SEA AND if Russia cannot stand European armies within the time of America being able to provide full assistance, blue side loses the war and this ends here
>If China can stand the heat OR if Russia can stand the heat, the US would land armies in Europe or Asia
(will continue)

>after one of the fronts (Asia or Europe) is under full control, the US and China OR Russia would assist Russia OR China
>after both Asia and Europe are under control, Middle East and Africa are invaded
Tada.

If nukes are being accounted for, blue wins no contest. If not, it would go down like this:
>Russia and US invade Britain and France with relative ease
>Pakistan, India and North Korea invade China
>worst case scenario, China is reduced to core China (supposing that Pakistan and India can take over the himalayas and that North Korea alone can take over Manchuria)
>this probaly wouldn't happen
>If it did, Russia and the US would just send help over and fuck orange very good
>Israel does nothing because it has zero power projection outside of MENA

from the china / russia / US trio's perspective:

kazakhstan and mongolia would be the first to fall so that china and russia can improve their land and air connections

the US would need to secure access through the panama canal while keeping oil production in texas and the gulf of mexico secure. meanwhile they would be looking at securing canadian, mexican, and venezuelan resources oil and resources.

the trio would somehow have to figure out how to get control over mid east oil and australian ore. the pacific naval war would take a long time for either side to win and the mid east would be a huge quagmire (russian and chinese troops would be bogged down in the mountainous regions of iran, turkey, and iraq)

the northsea oil & gas fields would probably collapse after awhile of US and russian interference (cyber and air/naval operations)

Good luck trying effectively control méxico, the whole of central america, northern southamerica, the amazonas, the andes region and patagonia. Blue has no chance in the american continent. It will all come down to guerrilla warfare and we know what happens in that scenario.

It depends on how long it lasts.

The three countries have a huge early advantage since they are the biggest militaries in the world so all the other countries, despite massive resources and population would lose and if blue can capitalize on this and move fast without being crippled by overextension it could win.

However, if white can survive this and militarize itself on the level of blue then blue would slowly but surely be pushed back and then get rekt.

>Blue has like 90% of all nukes.

94.83% to be precise.

Of course, that is coming from a South American.
Name one Latin American tank that can compete with the M1A2.
Name one Lartin American fighter jet that can compete with the F-22.
Name one Latin American radar that can detect a B-2.
There aren't any. Latin American militaries are shit. You don't even have means to defend yourselves against our navy, the only aircraft carrier in all of Latin America is a WW2 era floating duck that carries A-4 Skyhawks which are Vietnam era toys. Your technology is unmatched. And as for guerillas I have no fucking doubt that latinos would much rather have their countries invaded and liberated by the US than keep living under the claws of corruption and organized crime.

*our technology is unmatched

from the rest of the world's perspective:

russia would be target #1 as european forces can hold out long enough and sino-russian forces would take too long to gain significant influence over the mid east and south asia

access to african resources and mid east / north sea oil would be vital. further a large number of african forces would be trained and led by europeans and be shipped through egypt and maybe algeria/morocco. the convoys would easily be protected by european and air/naval ops.

latin america would be hard pressed to survive american forces but they would probably survive the longest due to their relative isolation and geography

it would be vital for east asian / pacific forces to take control over the south china sea islands. preventing the use of the hainan spaceport will also be of interest. securing taiwan and luzon from the trio's forces will also be important.

I have no doubt that the US could destroy Latin American conventional armies relatively easily.

The occupation that follows each country would be the problem tho and as more countries fall the worse it becomes. It'd be Vietnam x100 and the US would bleed dry trying to keep a gigantic 500mln region in order.

That is of course if Latin Americans are patriotic enough to resist, I think Mexicans and the like would surely fight back but I'm not sure about my compatriots, if our occupiers treat us well I don't see the Uruguayan people revolting too hard.

Negro your cunt has been trying to defeat meds armed with soviet era ak's since the 90's without success. You are not fooling anyone, and remember, you're on Sup Forums, if you are not willing to pick a book, at least google before posting.

Nigga he is right, our conventional forces know that they are outmatched, don´t you think they prepare for something like that
The Chileans can just retreat and take you on urban warfare on Santiago, or take the fight to the andes mountains where your tanks will have little to no effect, we can do the same and take you on the jungle or the sierra madre, large vehicles are useless and airstrikes will be inefficient.
If you think anyone will fight a conventional war against you you are really stupid, we all saw how you got your ass kicked by some rice farmers and sandniggers, who now are being defeated by the own Iraqui forces

Who will win?
What's your rating of sides?
Who do you prefer to side with?

BRAAPPP WILL WIN
0/10 ALL
10/10 BRAPP
IM WITH KEK

It seems you're basing your view solely on what happened in Vietnam. Vietnam is a small country covered completely in jungle. Vietnam was being supported by a world superpower and on its border it was being supplied by the largest country on earth in terms of workforce. Vietnam was a country that the US couldn't invade for political reasons and that even then it still won the war with bombings, which was proved with the Paris accords in which North Vietnam agreed to fuck off. If anything Vietnam was lost because of angry hippies. There won't be angry hippies in WW3. Also the Vietnamese people genuinely hated America. That's not true for latinos, is it? I am going to ask you seriously now, because this is something that I have talked about to other latinos like Venezuelans and Brazilians, and one thing they say is they would love to be liberated by America. Tell me, don't you romancize about the idea of the US invading your country, freeing you from corruption, drugs, crime, bringing democracy and freeedom and everything? I imagine that at least good chunks of your populance do, and, upon invasion, you might as well just coperate with us. Anyway. I'm not even taking geographical matters into account. As I said, Vietnam was a small dense jungle without much room for maneuvers other than M113s rolling in the grasslands and Hueys on the jungles. Not true for South America, it's a really big city with lots of opportunities for tactical and operational action. Urban warfare wouldn't be much of a deal when we have helicopters gunships and drones 24/7 monitoring everything from the sky and shooting at anything that moves. Many South American militaries barely have any effective anti aircraft weaponry at all, the best that I can think of would be the Venezuelan tor system and even that isn't good enough for us. You may say occupation might be costy but its WW3 and you can bet your asses we would make you pay back in taxes, labor and resources

*really big continent

kek you dumb burger you spent 30 minutes and wasted 98% of your neurons conductivity capacity for a wall of text that nobody is going to read because you are so dumb that you keep on making mistakes and mending your own posts. Keep on adding on that stereotype.

Blue

what difference would North Korea make though?

I made a long and constructive post, replying to your posts which showed that you were apparently engaged in this thoughtful discussion, but now you desmise my entire post because it's "long" and "hard to read" and you now insult me based on my nationality. If you want to throw insults, I can throw insults. I can insult you a filthy subhuman spic shithole latino with no culture history or even fucking racial identity because you are a bunch of mixed race mongrels living in a fucking shithole piece of hell on Earth god forsaken subcontinent, drug rotten corrupt to the core place you call "Latin" """America" when I live in the most powerful nation in the history of human civilization on its very apex with a Donald Trump presidency which by the way is going to build a wall 10 feet tall only to keep you monkeys out of this beautiful country. Have a god damn good night, I hope you don't get bitten by a giant spider or get robbed during your sleep, amigo.

It just would nuke all oponents.

blue easy ofcourse

white in a non nuke scenario
>a coalition of western and central euros easily steamrolls russia
>china's zerg rush is cancelled out by indians, and japan enjoys the 2nd nanking
>america suffers from mexican infiltration attack and lack of power projection to other theatres because their precious carriers are useless against modern great powers that can deploy hypersonic ASMs

nobody in a nuke scenario

>north korea not sided
>due to balance reasons

US alone can fuck all the rest.
What do you think about Chink vs Russia