The savior of Chile

The savior of Chile.

Other urls found in this thread:

desuarchive.org/int/thread/65453692/#65456791
scielo.cl/fbpe/img/cecon/v43n127/fig06-01.jpg
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6170117.stm
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

F

S-rank for killing leftists in a creative way

...

wena nido

Mi General Augusto Pinochet ;_;7

desuarchive.org/int/thread/65453692/#65456791

Nice lying you fucking leftist faggot.

...

Even the mightiest would fall if the whole world raided him. What a shitty argument.

>Chile's poverty rate is estimated to be between 40-50% at the time Pinochet took over, at the end of his regime the poverty line was estimated to at about 10-15%, the picture simply took the poverty rate from the year of the coup. the 19% fall in productivity statistic was taken at the lowest point in productivity during his regime, which was 1975. this was to be completely expected considering the country was already declining in productivity after the appropriation of many foreign owned enterprises under socialist governments, it also happened to line up with a global economic depression, which spells doom for a mono-exporting country, the fact that we managed to recover from that is considered a miracle.
graph: scielo.cl/fbpe/img/cecon/v43n127/fig06-01.jpg
>the steep decline in average earnings is only considered a decline after adjusting for inequality, a lot of the country's communists and socialists were economically shunned in order to force migration.
>the hated by the entire population of my country claim is absurd, he is still highly regarded by many in the country and his legacy is still highly debated.
source: news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6170117.stm
>the claim to "long-lasting socioeconomic damage" is also absurd, a simple comparison to the rest of south america should suffice as proof.

LEFTISM ETERNALLY BTFO

...

>no credible arguments

shitskins actually fucking believe this

...

...

>the I went on pol and now think I know anything about politics starter pack

mind if I save this my friend?

Illegals don't pay taxes and are a fiscal loss dumb fuck.

go ahead

t. basement-dwelling manlet dicklet chronic masturbator

thanks :^)

>when your leftist policies have such massive repercussions that slavic shitholes like poland and czechia are now the safest countries in europe

daily reminder that there is 0 (zero) difference between Sup Forums and Sup Forums

t. assblasted heftylol inbred sheep shagging cunt planning to overthrow the bourgeoisie with his kitchen knife

...

I still don't understand why Marxists come to Sup Forums. They've taken /his/, and now they want to take Sup Forums too. Un-fucking-believable.

>RAAACIST FASCIST BIGOT,.HOMOPHOBIC MISOGYNISTIC, TRANSPHOBIC, ISLAMAPHOBE, NAZI

why would we care about Sup Forums and Sup Forums when we're on Sup Forums?

Their ideology has zero success.

Every developed country remains capitalist for a reason. Marx is considered a joke by almost all modern economists. They are either keynesian or austrian.

ITT

>3. All politics and current events belong on Sup Forums.

>austrian
ahahaha

not an argument

you forgot xenophobic too

>They are either keynesian
So still leftist.

wena nido

>he ignores my post completely

Lmao no setious economist is a marxist friend. They are all capitalists who support private corporations operating for private profit and private property.

All implementations of marx's economic theories have ended in failure each time

Keynes thought Marx and socialism were dumb too.

Sup Forums BTFO

I had a teacher on middle school who was a Pinochetboo. She got fired I guess

good, shame she wasn't chucked in the nearest favela

>keynesian is leftist economics

Truly our education at its finest.

Keynesianism isn't leftist economic theory you idiot.

>austrian
>marxists
Those are equally laughable nowadays

It's center left. It's not far left, but it's still left of center and therefore leftist.

No. It's not even a political alignment. Stop embarassing yourself.

When will Americans learn that a simple left/right dichotomy is useless for analyzing economic theories.

FDR is on the left side, idiot.

No serious economist is an Austrian either.

And Shinzo Abe is on the right-wing side you fucking idiot.

Keynes' theories do not align with either political spectrum. You can be a right win keynesian same with being a left wing keynesian.

>"libertarians" on the right
>"anarcho-capitalism"
>"liberals" on the left

Sup Forums has no porn threads

Doubt.jpeg seeing as how it's the only other school taken seriously by economists while marxism isn't.

If you want successful countries that are largely free market the US, Hong Kong, Switzerland, and such come to mind.

Keynes' theories are literally taught to first year undergrads in economics, it's a fucking theory of economics, not a political theory.

It just so happens that the right-wing in America is so fucking greedy that they make everything a political issue so that they can reduce their taxes.

>classical liberalis is left wing

dumbfuck graph

Thank you based nederbro.

free market ≠ austrian economics

As America is the dominant political force in the world, we get to define what is left and right wing. The rest of the world started using "liberal" to mean "progressive" because we do. So if we say Keynesianism (big government) is left wing, it is.

m8 austrian school is free market while Keynesian takes a mixed approach

We still use "liberal" to mean right-wing. You mad?

also forgot singapore

>The rest of the world started using "liberal" to mean "progressive" because we do
Can't tell if you're trolling, or just stupid.
Doesn't mean that either, you nonce.

...

Not literally of course you twerp, but liberal here means classic liberal, and classic liberal people here are called right-wing, classic liberal parties are called right-wing parties.

The savior of chilli

>when you kill 50% of the population to stop the 1%
>when you have constant famines but it's ok because you sent a dog to space

this isnt Sup Forums
you have to go back

>Can't tell if you're trolling
I'm trolling. I thought the filename here would have given it away since it was making fun of the picture.

...

but you see, hans wannabe, germans were supposed to be superior enough to take on uentermenschen at a 1:10 ratio. Numerical superiority was supposed to be irrelevant because of the supposed genetic Aryan superiority.

But you keep on sucking HItlers cock.

They were fighting against the British which the Nazis initially didn't even wanted to because they respected them.

Against Sl*vs the Nazis showed their true Aryan superiority.

Very true. A lot of similarities with Trump like his love of Jews for example. We may be ahead of great times again.

indeed
>pic rel
truly a shame western allies pretended like Holland was an occupied victim country, it pretty much had the same status as Austria. Same number of Nazis. Should have parceled it out in occupation zones, with Soviets getting a piece.

So good it crashed and burnt every time.

I don't dispute the fact that Marx had some legitimate criticisms against capitalism, but his theory just does not work in practice. It might sound good on paper but that's it.

Always love how Pinochet threads bring out the leftypol lurkers on here. We truly need more helicopters.

what's the only free thing a leftist will not take?

a helicopter ride

Yes, your "pic rel" is bullshit because the only reason the Soviet scum could do that is true incalculable material support from Western countries, and because the Nazis were fighting a war on more fronts than you can imagine.

I also feel very bad that the French and especially the English felt the need to attack Germany, as Germany had very noble goals that would have pushed Europe into a second period of global dominance instead of what is happening now, which is moral, financial and demographic decay in every single country.

...