So...did he do it?

so...did he do it?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coverture
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

no

He did. It was painfully obvious by the end of the movie that he was just making the entire scenario up in his head in prison.

It's like reverse Shutter Island where they made Leo think that he was crazy when he was actually not.

>they made Leo think that he was crazy when he was actually not
he was playing along

he did it. He's a man. He must have done it.

Not until June 28.

user, just how far did you get into the movie?

I, too, enjoy watching movies 22 minutes at a time as if they were television series.

I watched the complete movie.

I still think he might have done it.

This is the batman that got prison raped by joker and tried to kill him, right?

so he gave her motivation to try all of this stuff that she did? why because of the game mastermind in the bar scene?

he manipulated her into becoming a psychopath. He ruined her life and emotionally abused her even though he probably didn't realize it. But he used his dominant status as a man to get what he wants, just as he says in the car-ride. "Be the cool girl, always laid back and up for dumb shit and a hole to fuck"

>he manipulated her
>he probably didn't realize it

men are naturally manipulative towards women. They don't realize it.

It's proof enough to think that men are manipulative and evil, when girls literally have a whole movement about doing this.

she had all the money and was clearly guiding every action they were taking once they got back together, to point of her stage managing him and the ex-fake rapist said it best about being annexed.

This idea that women change the men they're with was taken very literally by the author.

Those two things plus being financially more well off. I mean yeah he has his size but of the two of them squaring off even after he slams her into a wall, she still manages to defeat him, at least for then.

Also the first night she comes back, he is so scared he is sitting in the chair with the cat with a light on at night.

None of which anyone else can see but the viewer. So without more evidence, your baitposts aren't going to get much more traction.

Women are seen as naturally develop manipulative skills at a younger age and why they learn to control their emotions better then free-range male abuse that use to happen.

So, guys are better at manipulating NOW, but we didn't have to work at it all our lives lie girls.

This is the difference of guys hitting another guy he doesn't like and a girl masquerading an entire coupe against a persons life.

>Also the first night she comes back, he is so scared he is sitting in the chair with the cat with a light on at night.

He is scared because she showed him that she isn't falling for his male power games. It's his masculinity called into question. He feels stripped off his natural strength he thought he possessed.

nigger baiter

Finding out your wife is a murderer is like a doe gaining a venomous bite. Or dentata. it has nothing to do with power and all to do with predicting if she is going to try and kill you or not.

Which is why they kept showing scenes of him being up at night because he wasn't sure if she was going to try and do something. Which makes pregnancy thing all the more hilarious

She actually had a reason to be scared of him because scared men are unpredictable. There was a higher chance of him killing her than there was of her ever even touching him. Women know what boundaries, respect and personal space are because we are expected to be decent human beings. That expectation doesn't exist for men.

So your argument is that all of her behavior and responsibility reverts back to Affleck because reasons?

because he's a typical "man". The movie makes that pretty clear. He's "charming" when he wants to have sex and convincingly manipulates her into the relationship but drops her for a younger woman at the first opportunity presented to him.

...

fuck off. Just because I offended you in your masculinity doesn't make it "b8"

isn't it weird complaining about men even in a fake way when you are in fact a man?

nice try. try again you clown

but that wasn't the other user, I'm being serious. Sup Forums has very few women.

>he's a typical "man"
typical female logic
Duty and responsibility is more of a men's features.

>Duty and responsibility

something I rarely ever see in men, not even from my own father.

yeah, i thought you made a valid point. most guys here never even dated a girl, let alone held a job.

Oh, so its a father complex.
Now its all clear.

Next, please.

>white women are so entitled that if you push them around a little bit and buy a PlayStation , they cook up an elaborate plan and frame you for murder. All the while killing some poor rich cuck who has nothing to do with it in the first place.

It's a brave new world desu. Happening to Johnny Depp RIGHT NOW

>father complex

no it isn't. See, you are already doing it. Just writing off everything I say because "I AM A MAN AND I KNOW EVERYTHING BETTER THAN YOU"

>most guys here
and by this you mean urself of course.

>poor rich cuck

he was a creepy asshole that just wanted to use her for sex. He deserved it.

best girl

He seemed to be doing fine just living his life without been bothering her for years . He even told Nick to fuck off when he learned of her disappearance. He literally did nothing wrong

He's a creepy guy and was obviously obsessed with her. He did EVERYTHING wrong.

>I AM A MAN AND I KNOW EVERYTHING BETTER
I didn't stated it. I didn't say about EVERYTHING.
I am a man and I know MEN better - that would be the right statement, right?
I know what men are cuz Im man myself.
See? You summires all men to look like the one. The bad. Like your father.
This is called logic, better get used to it when you talk about the opposite sex that builds its mentality on it.

No, I was using my father as an example because out of all the men that should be inclined to uphold duty and responsibility this is literally the one that would have to have the most reason to do it, I mean it doesn't get much closer than family.

So you're telling me.. if he creeped her out a decade ago or whatever, kept his distance after a restraining order , and she comes to him years later and continues the manipulation + murders him in cold blood, he's some how the bad guy ?

yes, because her coming back doesn't give him an excuse to be creepy again. She was in distress and really needed some help and he tried to use her for sex. That was his fault.

>women are not responsible for their actions in any point in time, they are like children, and must be coddled by men in order to function like a human being

That's very sexist of you Mr. Libcuck, you should be more progressive.

>She was in distress and really needed some help and he tried to use her for sex.
Is this now called common sense in the USA?
Really?
Did you even watch this movie?
She freaked out cuz he DIDN'T want sex with her, he was fucking another woman.
This was all about her uncontrollable jealosy.

I'm guessing it is nothing like the book then?

Because the book is blatantly obvious that she's basically the devil.

Nah it's pretty much like that in the film, this guy is just so delusional that he is literally blaming men for her sociopathy. It's ludicrous.

that's why it's called "fiction". A real woman would never do what she did. It's basically a satirization of an MRA's worst fears.

>implying he ever pushed her

any flashback scene is suspect because she's a narcissistic psychopath

just listen to the fucking dialogue, sounds like some shit out of a fairy tale. the worst thing massoud bin al'faleeqi did was be inattentive and cheat on her

>boundaries

>she is a murderer


u_u

he violated her personal space and boundaries first. Everything is fair game after that.

heh

Did you ever met other fathers from other families?
Is this some clinical issue I see here?

Oh yeah, in real life, women can never be manipulative or commit murder.

That has literally never happened, once, in the history of ever.

After all, their little lady brains can't even comprehend of the concept.

there is another option either it's krager or one of those tranny's that get angry when you don't refer to them as female in your pronoun usage. Someone could have left latch open on Sup Forums

this board just gets worse every day

ah, there it is. Just turning around my words to make it look like women are just too stupid to commit crimes.

Nope, it's the exact opposite. We are too smart. Nice try though, little clown.

>muh personal space

Therefore murder is okay.

>murder is fair game if a man took interest in you but you didn't want his advances and put a restraining order on him
>murder is justified if a woman feels like manipulating someone based on someone being attracted to you in the past
>women are not responsible for their actions and if done because of a man, the responsibility falls completely on a man and she carries none of that weight

That's very very sexist of you, why do you treat women like children?

>there are people in this thead who are actually falling for this bait

Wow, you have absolutely no concept of what Hyperbole is, do you?

why do you insist on calling women children? Is this one of those pedophile fantasies you dream about?

...

As a liberal myself it's very concerning that you are basically saying that women are not responsible for their actions, and because men can cheat or emotionally damage a woman that justifies murder, manipulation, lying. That's very very sexist of you.

...

>as a liberal myself

But user upto a little more than a centuary ago, they were legally considered children. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coverture