Wow, such edginess!
Anthony Jeselnik weighs in on the mass shooting
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtu.be
en.wikipedia.org
keepandbeararms.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
ammoland.com
wktv.com
snopes.com
en.wikipedia.org
nraila.org
ktxs.com
crimeresearch
twitter.com
He's kind of painted himself into a corner.
He's right. Muslims will stop at nothing to kill all of us.
Fucking idiot.
Probably a Trump supporter too.
Is that a threat?
i want to get out of the united states, is canada easy to immigrate to?
Sounds like a challenge tbqh family
Not unless you're asian and have a degree in advanced medicine
>lol i'm so edgy and controversial but not actually edgy enough to say anything offensive
youtube.com
We should start a dead pool and take bets on when the next mass shooting will be.
Put me down for July 21st.
Go back to Europe and take all your white people with you
Anthony Jeselnik is far, far cooler and funnier than you could ever ASPIRE to be. In a thousand lifetimes.
And you KNOW it.
But Canada has even more Muslims
test
>be American
>get shot
Doesn't top his tweet about the shooting at the Amy Schumer movie.
Hey that's actually pretty good
>be euro
>have family raped
CANADA ONRY FOR YERROW MAN
FUKK OF WERE FURR
WAITO PIGGU
Just off yourself.
Don't use a gun though, it's bad enough liberals include suicides in the gun death numbers without you adding to it.
nice timeframe you got there anthony
yeah, i'm sure that there will be a larger shooting in the next 1000 years or so. but give it time give it time
...
Accepted
Everything about this is absolute gold.
He's right.
Look at all the blame being levied against Islam right now as proof.
Rather he was Islamist, a bigot, a homophobe, a extremist, a radical, whichever...he got the idea in his head to kill these people.
That man, whichever label, took his idea, walked into a gun store, easily and legally purchased the killing machines necessary for his idea, then executed his idea.
Yet this country focuses on the formation of the idea, instead of the easily accessible killing machines that allowed his idea to be executed and stole 50 lives.
Americans now seek to regulate ideas, instead of their killing machines.
We don't want you here faggot. Please leave north america
No. It's not.
I'm trying to leave the United States and it's hard as fuck. I need to get a work visa just to be able to work in another country. Most English speaking countries like Australia, England, New Zealand, and Canada offer something called "working holiday visas" so you can work abroad. Guess which country doesn't offer those types of visas? Did you guess the United States? Because you'd be right.
So not only do you need a work visa, but the company you want to work for has to prove to their government that they can't find any native citizens that are fit for the job before they can hire you.
You'd think being white, college educated, employed, and having the money to make a down payment on a house would allow you to live in any country you fucking want, but you'd be dead fucking wrong.
The United States government doesn't want you to leave, and other countries don't want you to immigrate.
right, a massive slaughter like this involving guns could never take place in france or norway
good thing blacks aren't raping in America
He's right.
Or belgium
>July 21st
Try June 21st. There's no way a whole month passes before another shooting in the greatest country on earth.
Dear gunsfags
Where was the good guy with a gun to stop the madman?
Dear gunfags,
Why was this man allowed to buy the gun and ammo used to kill 50 people as little as a week prior? Was it sold to him under the pretense that he was a "Responsible gun owner using his 2nd amendment rights"?
Because he was a responsible gun owner, right until he wasn't.
Decent bait, have you tried it on Sup Forums yet?
Or perhaps that's where you got it.
Here is your reply.
The point isn't that you can win pitched battles against a professional army with all its ordinance, as a rag-tag citizens' militia with small arms. The point is that you CAN FIGHT. You can bleed them. When they come patrolling through your neighborhood, you might be able to take a couple of the fuckers with you. Hell, you might even be able to run away and do it again; they couldn't engage in endless "manhunts" for everyone who resisted them. They'd never feel safe and there could be shooters behind any window.
Of course, they COULD call in the artillery and air-support and level your neighborhood, sure. What would this get them though? Well, it would piss a lot of people off when innocents died and play into the hands of rebels. It would make a lot of the soldiers in that professional military seriously consider whether they were doing the right thing or not. Finally, it would simply kill people, and NO ONE wants to rule a nation of corpses.
The aim of a tyrant is to control, not to kill. What they want is to be able to have militarized police & gestapo point guns at people and cow them into submission to whatever dictates they want to impose. If citizens are instead waiting behind their doors and ready to shoot first when the jackbooted thugs come around, they've already failed.
So, the point is to fight. If you resist, you're not being controlled, and you're also undermining attempts to control others who can't or won't fight. Yes, you might die, of course. However, that's why Patrick Henry said what he famously said, more or less.
"As long as people can resist, they can be free, and tyrants can never succeed." When you're talking about using swords, knives and clubs against modern military weapons though, it ACTUALLY becomes pointless, because you can't bleed them at all. They'll just shoot you with beanbags, rubber, water cannons, microwave guns and other submission devices.
That's why Americans having guns is so important.
Not every second week, no.
>be European
>ban guns
>get shot anyway
The best of both worlds.
>6000 people dead from gun violence in America in half a year
Did that happen in France, Belgium or Norway too?
Niggers are actually well spoken and respectful.
but muh AR-15s
muh rights
muh liberty
MUH FREEDOM
>muslims do muslim things
>lol americans amirite?
>this faggot still exists
It astounds me that "poor man's daniel fucking tosh" is a viable career
>6000 people dead from gun violence in America in half a year
99.9% of which is exclusively nigs and wetbacks shooting each other over drugs?
>That's why Americans having guns is so important.
How many tyrants have there been in the history of America? Or the West in general?
>Where was the good guy with a gun to stop the madman?
ask the fags.
ask their liberal gods who want nothing more than to floor more muslims into the country.
Bars are gun free zones, the gun wasn't allowed to be in that bar, this legally shouldn't have happened! How did he get a gun into a gun free zone???
Just piss off the government and apply for asylum. The American police state is easy to leave that way.
Can't carry in clubs, as for the second part ask the fbi why they cleared his gun purchase when they suspected terrorist ties to the gunman.
>killing machines
I've heard people refer to knives this way.
If, by "poor man's Daniel fucking Tosh" you mean "actually funny comedian with razor-sharp wit, magnificent timing and perfect delivery of the blackest of humour," then you'd be absolutely spot-on.
Thats the most retarded shit i ever read
his stand up is good
dozens in Europe.
also the EU.
dumb frogposter
>The point isn't that you can win pitched battles against a professional army with all its ordinance, as a rag-tag citizens' militia with small arms. The point is that you CAN FIGHT. You can bleed them. When they come patrolling through your neighborhood, you might be able to take a couple of the fuckers with you. Hell, you might even be able to run away and do it again; they couldn't engage in endless "manhunts" for everyone who resisted them. They'd never feel safe and there could be shooters behind any window.
This is literally how we lost vietnam. We had a 1 million to 30 thousand kill to death ratio.
Elaborate?
Could he kill 50 people with large knife? Is knife meant for the kill? Or is handheld machine that fire high speedy projectiles meant for kill? How knife and handheld projectile machine the same?
>Where was the good guy with a gun to stop the madman?
Not at a gay bar on Latin night in a gun-free zone.
>Where was the good guy with a gun to stop the madman?
It was a fag bar.
Gays are TERRIFIED of guns.
You still didny provide an answer! Guns kill people
I'm sorry to hear that you're a resident of either Australia or England, both nations of which had their guns taken away from their citizens in 1996 following mass shootings.
I'm so terribly sorry that you're no longer free.
Stats are crazy!
Antonio Jizzelneck pls go
Dear gungraber,
Why do you and all of your ilk type like 13-year-old retards?
Oh yeah? Who? Remember I said "The West"
With due reason whose to say billy the gun owner wont turn psycho tommorrow and or his kid might
Excuse me but are guns legal in France?
Did the Boston bombers use guns?
Wow, you got me rustled
But then no one can be this retarded
whew breivik lmao, the madman
>How knife and handheld projectile machine the same?
>explosives aren't a thing
You don't get to own land mines and use tanks to obliterate home invaders, you aren't free either
This is how you spot a bootlicking faggot.
He actually thinks "liberty" and "freedom" are points to ridicule.
>Where was the good guy with a gun to stop the madman?
He was not allowed in the bar due to libcuck laws.
>Was it sold to him under the pretense that he was a "Responsible gun owner using his 2nd amendment rights"?
Yes, and if guns weren't legal, he would have bought it illegally from the local negro or Mexican instead
lost a ton of cool points by banging that hamplanet amy schumer. the man has no dignity
Europe is filled with them right now. Europeans have no right to defend themselves and no right to free speech. It's the land of "hate speech" laws where the government can tell you what you can and cannot say.
>I'm afraid
I'll bet you can't even bench one plate.
>But then no one can be this retarded
Not an argument
>from mass public shooting
Definition? Can you post an actual source instead of an image
wtf i hate white people now
I'm the guy who said we don't want you here. Called you a rude name too.
I just want to say I'm sorry about both.
>Europe is filled with them right now.
lol
>Brevik single-handedly ruining Norwegian murder statistics
>Where was the good guy with a gun to stop the madman?
It was a fag-joint full of gun-hating Liberals.
Had this emissary of the religion of peace pulled this shit anywhere else, the situation would have ended very differently and upwards of 40 dead innocent Americans would still be alive.
en.wikipedia.org
keepandbeararms.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
ammoland.com
wktv.com
snopes.com
en.wikipedia.org
nraila.org
These are just a few examples. There are literally dozens more, and hundreds of lives saved by gun-owners.
>Trump will be swept into power because off this attack
Based
>bangs Amy Schumer back when she was a 5 or 6 out of 10 and not fat
>leaves her
>she gets fat
>talk about a close shave
Can't schtick the Jeselnik.
How is his comment edgy? He was saying that the violence will only increase as paranoia becomes widespread. You retards need to refrain from using the word edginess until you know what it means.
>Is knife meant for the kill?
Why the fuck do Liberal retards keep bringing this up?
Cars aren't meant as weapons either.
They still kill several dozen times more people every fucking year.
no country would willingly accept weeaboo filth. end your life
By definition, yes it is. You were too obvious. Actually, were you trying to be ironic? If so good job. It was funny
>There are literally dozens more, and hundreds of lives saved by gun-owners.
Those lives were put at risk by gun owners.
youre right. i humbly retract my statement.
Knive primary purpose = Cutting
Car primary purpose = Transportation
Gun primary purpose = Killing
Liberal delusion meets barbarian mohammedan reality
You're 100% right.
If America made guns illegal, this crazed jihadist criminal would have never been able to get one.
Instead he would have stayed home that night, quietly studying blogs on white privilege and cultural appropriation.
>its a BASED JESSELNIK triggers the nu-males on Sup Forums thread
>They still kill several dozen times more people every fucking year.
1. More people use cars more often than guns
2. Cars are regulated, a lot, to avoid this
3. If cars weren't vital to the livelihood of the country they would have been banned decades ago
Who
crimeresearch DOT org/2015/06/comparing-death-rates-from-mass-public-shootings-in-the-us-and-europe/
not an argument
This.
>Country getting filled with religious fundamentalist rapists.
>Can't protect yourself, because that's against the law.
>Can't even complain about it, because that's against the law too.
Truly a grand socialist utopia.
I didn't know this was a dead career general?
Please tell me how that would have changed if law-abiding citizens were not allowed to own guns.
Do you legitimately think those criminals would have just stayed home, starting blogs about their white privilege and donating money to urban youth programs instead of shooting people if guns were "illegal"?