Dictatorship thread

Post in this thread ONLY if you live under a dictatorship

Other urls found in this thread:

thetower.org/article/in-sinai-isis-grows-with-irans-help/
telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/24/russia-targetting-european-elections-fake-news-eu-task-force/
ft.com/content/85683e08-e4a9-11e6-9645-c9357a75844a
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>inb4 north korean proxy

How are you living in a dictatorship?

It's a meme. In Italy, far-right and libertarian (?) groups call Italy a "dictatorship"

Trump is just exposing what the US government does all the fucking time, which is a good thing.

Unfortunately, when a Democrat takes office in 2024, Amerilards will fall asleep again while a fake progressive woman/nigger bombs the fuck out of the third world and rams a fat NSA cock up American asses.

The polls were right though. They predicted Hillary would win the popular vote by millions. Pundits and the media were the ones who were wrong, to assume she had won the election because of that

Hey

Living under a kleptocracy here, does it count?

Sup?

Yes

polling isn't supposed to find the popular winner, it's supposed to find the actual winner. All of the polls in important states like Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan were wrong as fuck.

>wanted to screenshot sankakucomplex ban
>it is accessible now

Welp, guess we are not in a dictatorship.

>sankakucomplex ban
Nothing of value was lost desu

I got a better picture

Not really, state by state in those areas it was neck and neck

do you know what a banana republic is?

this fat starts to believe every poll that doesnt support his policies is fake

such a delusional man in such a pathetic at-right way

A clothing store?

>I am the law

A country that relies on raw material exports and often relies on large corporate entities and is plagued by kleptocracy and corruption. The term itself originated in Honduras.

If you think any poll made by CNN, ABC, and NBC is honest or unbiased, you need a reality check.

Posting.

The same polls that gave Hillary a 95% chance of winning.

>Hur hur, muh media bias

>Muh judicial system bias


You know the step towards dictatorship often starts with dismissing independent institutions. I mean criticizing media isn't wrong per say but when you start outright dismissing it, that when it becomes a problem. Before you know it media will be saying the sky is blue but people will insist it's purple because "muh bias".

>this is the president of the United States
Woah, is this the power of... the Americans?

>implying Hillary won't win in 2020

every poll is biased and he should be tolerant to it in a way since hes in power. what i pointed out is this fat will no longer believe any poll/study thats against him even when your country has to confront a real crisis. thats the problem

CNN et al aren't independent institutions. They're the equivalent of reading Pravda in the Soviet Union.

>unironically being a censorship apologist

>They're the equivalent of reading Pravda in the Soviet Union

>AMERICAN EDUCATION

Is it allowed to dislike him?

Or to say, they're all shills for the same tired, boring globalist, pro-Islam SJW agendas.

Like half of the country do that.

India tier democracy isn't too bad, they used to be better before Modi

>two of the biggest shitposters in history, Canada and Australia
>full democracies

Is there any relation between this?

> Be Trump
> Be Russian puppe
> Be Saudi puppet
> Be Israeli puppet
> Be Bannon's puppet
> Your fans still have the balls to call other people "cucks"

>Or to say, they're all buzzword for the same tired, boring buzzword, pro-buzzword buzzword agendas.

Trump isn't part of this little cabal, that's why they don't like him. Hillary was, that's why they spent untold vast sums of money to buy the election for her.

Now, Hillary might have been an ok president if you're part of the whips-and-leather crowd on Castro Street, or you're a women's studies major, or an ISIS member, but not so much if you've been out of a job for months and have to pay a ludicrous Obamacare "tax".

The big media outlets in the States aren't comprised of journalists with integrity disseminating well-researched facts on issues of importance for the public to decide what is proper. They're all objective-based opinion bloggers who try to find facts which support their preconceived viewpoints on issues and in doing so persuade the public to adopt that viewpoint. They don't bother fairly representing the opposition or remaining neutral.

All media outlets were partial during the elections, which is not the role they're supposed to serve as journalists -- CNN and MSNBC in particular.

They were always biased to the left, but in Walter Cronkite's time, they at least pretended to be objective. Any pretense of objectivity was thrown out the window many moons ago.

sup

Ding ding, my fellow countrymen are fucking idiots.

>Trump visits Army base in Florida today
>soldiers greet him with huge cheering and applause when he mentions the Muslim ban

>Russian
>Saudi
>Israeli
>Bannon
missed main point

He is dismissing them because they are so blatantly and unreservedly biassed and not independent

The Syria conflict is so impossibly mixed up that nobody can figure out exactly what's even going on.

what the fuck is this trash pic? full on autism

>Syria conflict
whole human history

Lemme break it down for you.

>Obama wanted to aid rebels who wanted to overthrow Assad as part of the Arab Spring
>while this included some middle class hipster kids with iPhones, the bulk of the rebels were ISIS members seeking to overthrow the otherwise secularist Assad and institute Iran 2.0 in Syria
>because Syria is also a Russian ally, Putin intervened to prop up Assad and bitchslap Obama

So basically, Russia had a mix of altruistic (stopping Islamofascism from taking over Syria) and self-centered interests (preventing the overthrow of an ally). Obama meanwhile...he only saw a couple pics of hipsters in Damascus with cell phones and assumed he was helping them rather than ISIS.

That's about as clear as I can explain it.

Also true of Egypt, but in that case Mubarak was a US ally and the Egyptian army quickly intervened to stop the Muslim Brotherhood from taking over.

>>Iran 2.0
A shia regime with at least some democratic elements.
>>ISIS
A sunni fundamentalist regime with absolutely no human rights.

Also, the rest is not entirely incorrect but you can simplify Russia's renewed interests in the middle east as part of Putin's long-term empire rebuilding strategies.

I really hated this fake news trend when CNN and co brought it up.

So I'm glad Trump is going with it.

>Iran
>democratic
>any human rights at all

Because the news agencies just wanted to use fake news as an excuse to censor political opposition. So It's good to see it's coming back at them to bite them in their ass.

Obama called Fox fake news, he wouldn't invite their reporters to the White House, so payback's a bitch.

Also ISIS is being bankrolled by Iran.

thetower.org/article/in-sinai-isis-grows-with-irans-help/

The ayatollah is indirectly elected by the people, just like your president. There are multiple parties/fractions and some of them are progressives. Currently the progressives are in government and they are the ones who initiated opening up a little bit to the west two years ago.

I said >elements, theoretically. Doesn't mean the elections are clean but it's not Saudi Arabia. (aka your "ally")

That is bs. Hezbollah and other Shia
organizations eg. the current Yemeni government are bankrolled by Iran.

Does anyone have the Iran diaspora bingo image?

The EU now also called upon tech companies to filter out fake news.
While stating the EU doesn't want to do it themselves, because that would be censorship.. so they let some nameless corporation do it for them instead..

Which is explicitly against the Dutch constitution, which is supposed to ensure our freedom of press.

I, the amerindian man agree.

>hasn't taken the bogpill yet
typical

hello

they are 100% free to shitpost as much as the want.

Le Penn and Wilders are leading the polls for the 2017 elections.

So.. ehh.. quickly intervene! Fake news! Russians!

telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/24/russia-targetting-european-elections-fake-news-eu-task-force/

>Social media must take stronger stance or face regulatory intervention, says EU chief
ft.com/content/85683e08-e4a9-11e6-9645-c9357a75844a

It's the same Soros crew pulling the same stunts they tried here about Russia rigging blah blah blah.

I wouldn't be surprised if Russia would try to intervene in our elections. Because our elections could shape the future of the EU. If the UK and the Netherlands would start a new union the EU would basically be done for.

But Wilders has been leading the polls for like 2 years now. And it took him years to reach this point. So blaming populism on the Russians is a bit ridiculous.

Reporting in.

Vucic holds about the same power in the state as Stalin.

does having no government count?

Loving that pic
Reminds me of the Libyan robemaster wizard mr. G.

bitch he was swag

>Implying she'll survive until then

>american educated person having trust in CNN polling

I think the weirdest thing about this generation is how much time politicians spend on social media and how we get to know new laws and the state of the government through twitter.

Wouldn't have dreamed of this being a thing 15 years ago. Then again it's probably just the next step after television.

he doesn't until he starts purging the opposition

>wilders
>doing anything except screaming like a baby

Welcome to the 21st century. Enjoy your stay.

Yeah. I don't like it.
It prevents normal people from doing "actual politics".

What opposition ?
He has no opposition...

>"evil"
>""
What did he mean by this?

>tfw 2nd most corrupt leader in the planet
why is life so cruel, lads?

JUST

same here