International Courts Should Be Used To Replace Wars

Nationalists, Expansionists, Nutjobs, War-Mongers, Military industrial complex, and Jingotists just got blown the fuck out with this idea. Solve all international disputes by international elected courts. I think this is a great idea because instead of wars which waste tons resources and lives we can settle it in a public court.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=RtXW1LNUXJE
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_activism
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

CAPO, one thing nomas wanted to tell you, I liked very much your post, really, is the most stunning I have seen at the time, is a work of art, without exaggeration, is something that, at first glance, might have been made by none da vinci, genius that has can be noticed from kilometers away, not even the worst of gossips might say that we are not facing a majestic view once every thousand years. I have not seen in all my years of life something of this magnitude, it causes you an indescribable feeling, an immense despite not having done any action joy, a strange feeling to find but fantastic, something like what feels a breeze a hot summer, or see the joy of a child opening their christmas presents, or just be with the person we love. Do not listen to the gossips who constantly criticize anyone who does not meet absolutely all expectations, just trust me to me and to all those beings who believe and admire such a great work of art. There will always be people who will tell you what you did not have value, but the secret is to ignore them, those people would give anything to have created something as magnificent as what we are seeing. Just as a man in love creates a poem to express their deepest feelings, or as an artist creates a work of art some time that not even he knows, this is how was created this post, in the same way. It may seem that I'm exaggerating, I repeat, but it is not, nowhere near, dijiese not exaggerating if I stand before an admirable, amazing creation, an almost greater than its creator beauty.

All wars should be settled in a global Eurovision contest.

youtube.com/watch?v=RtXW1LNUXJE

This is not a new idea...

courts without a means to enforce their verdicts are as useful as tits on a fish

Nooo

I really like the netherlands edm culture but I have mix feelings about your vid.

>ireland proceeds to annex half of europe within 5 years of eurovision being used for territorial conflict resolution
Whew

Funny idea but in all seriousness a court is a great way to settle problems.

Well it's a great idea

Why?

That's why America needs to get more involved with the U.N

Sounds like copypasta.

They wouldn't do that because Ireland is a democracy not an empire.

Violence is the supreme authority from which all other authorities derive. The only way such a court could function, is if a single backing force is able to take on all others and decisively win.

That's a fascist idea and couldn't be more wrong. The U.N, European Union, or the United States/China could enforce all decisions made by the court. If what you're saying is true the U.S military would control the U.S rather than Congress.

It's not really aimed at the dance crowd I think. But at the carnival crowd.

Ah yes, the current state of Euro affairs: Wanting more totalitarian methods

hey dumbass, you really think nobody would rise up to fight this court in a...WAR?

Time to take over potatoland

>The U.N, European Union, or the United States/China could enforce all decisions made by the court.
Yeah if they all agreed, as in being a single force.
>If what you're saying is true the U.S military would control the U.S rather than Congress.
But they control the military and the police enforce their laws.

>"Ireland is under Austrian protection. You have to get past my risen penis first."
What do?

Sure buddy, sure

No they wouldn't have to work together which they do on most things already

>But they control the military and the police enforce their laws.
Yeah, just like how the courts will control all these countries.

How could the judges be impartial if they were elected from a state that rebels want to overthrow? Their elected judges wouldn't want to lose their seats, and would therefore side with the status quo.

Judges swear an oath of neutrality. They don't have opinions of their owns or if they do they can't let that get involved, a lawyer has to feed them everything. That's how court cases work, the judge almost has to forget everything he knows and get spoonfed everything from the lawyers and then make his own decision based on rationality alone.

This thread is bait.

Are you one of those people that thinks it was the UN that brought the peace we have now and not the threat of nuclear war?

You're a troll, and you're going to enjoy ban

It was the U.N though.

>Judges swear an oath of neutrality. They don't have opinions of their owns or if they do they can't let that get involved, a lawyer has to feed them everything. That's how court cases work, the judge almost has to forget everything he knows and get spoonfed everything from the lawyers and then make his own decision based on rationality alone.

ahahaha

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_activism

>The U.N, European Union, or the United States/China could enforce all decisions made by the court.
The EU and UN are in no position to do anything
China routinely ignores UN rulings
The United States is losing its grip

That's based on people mad at the Judges decisison.

>he's such a puss he couldn't even post this on Sup Forums

>It was the U.N though.
The UN was nothing more than a conference room. The entire thing could be replaced with a skype call between the big powers.

you replied to the wrong person

You're a pussy, im banned from Sup Forums

Then give the U.N some real fucking power.

Like what, an army?

Quit fooling yourself. The concepts of national sovereignty and international rule of law are fundamentally incompatible. Sovereignty is, at the most basic level, the idea that supreme power over a region rests within that region. It is the idea that a nation's ruler will always have the final say, beholden only to the forces of circumstance. If an international court supersedes, then you've effectively unmade the nation as an independent state and remade it into an administrative district.

So, come back once you've figured out a way to implement a one-world government that isn't a colossal failure. Protip: that will never happen, because societies form and diverge too rapidly to maintain unity at such a scale. The US is already pushing the limit, with each coast practically considering the other a foreign nation. Russia works because most of their population is clustered in a comparatively small portion of the country.