What would the world look like today if he had won?

What would the world look like today if he had won?

...

white

imagine a world of Sup Forums

scary

Would his system of government have lasted?

Would it though. The US may not have been dramatically different. Europe would have though.

Uppity non-whites would be non-existent

Not much different by now.

The same technical and intellectual evolutions would have led to the same political and economical mecanisms.
The few differences consisting essentially in the stories we tell ourselves about who we are and who is historically guilty.

he would not, ie, the actions he took and made was because of who he was
he did those things because he is hitler causing germany to lose and so on

it would not have been the same past-world if he had won and thus the different now-world

Authoritarianism is inherently unstable. It would have collapses in a few decades, and Germans would have been horrified to learn that a Jewish people ever existed and they killed them all.

World would most likely be more peaceful.

>No cold war proxy wars
>no Isreal stirring up off the mid east
>USA not playing world police

Hitler may be dead, but now we live under an undercover dictatorship regime, run by his then enemies worlwide.

>Authoritarianism is inherently unstable

literally the best and most stable countries in history were kingdoms and empires.
and the worst and most unstable ones were republics.

Europe would have still been ravaged by war, so the US would have still ascended to super power status. And we wouldn't have given Europe all that Marshall plan money to develop, so they'd be poorer.

And if you believe Nazi propaganda, they wanted to just deport the Jews, so Israel might have been created or another Jewish state somewhere else would have been.

Monarchies were prone to being overthrown violently by either political rivals, or unhappy peasants. They also had a nasty habit of creating war, which is bad for stability. Democracies rarely go to war against other democracies. Modern liberal democracies are way better than the empires of old.

...

Yeah in Madagascar
We would be talking about the israelo-malasy conflict by now.

iraq wouldn't be destroyed

>Monarchies were prone to being overthrown violently by either political rivals, or unhappy peasants.

Only shitty ones that deserved to be overthrown

I guess by that logic the Romanovs deserved to be overthrown :^)

>shitty ones
That's a tautology.

>Europe would have still been ravaged by war, so the US would have still ascended to super power status. And we wouldn't have given Europe all that Marshall plan money to develop, so they'd be poorer

Assume that the battle of Britain was successful enough to force Britain to sue for peace and hitler quits whilst he's ahead and doesn't invade Russia. The occupied areas were largely undamaged and could be rebuilt easily.

US would have no reason to militarize if the war ended that early. They were still very isolationist until Pearl Harbor over a year later.

The Nazis were blatantly anti American and they violated so many treaties leading up to the war. The US would have militarized just in case the Nazis decided to get uppity again.

...

STFU

They did.

Is this accurate?

>150+ countries magically disappear