Bet you can't solve this one, huh

Bet you can't solve this one, huh

36 * 1 * 1

too old

2,3,6
2x3x6=36

a set of twins 2 years old and a 9 year old

2x2x9=36

WRONG

>children

3, 3, and 4

Blue

1,3, and 9

your test is flawed. :)

your test is seriously flawed. :)

2, 2, and 9

:^)

SPOILER: Solution
SPOILER: Solution
SPOILER: Solution

meant to quote these together though i guess it's unimportant

I guess I have ADD because as soon as I read "census-taker" I went to youtube and looked up that album

lmao

Yeah, that's how it works.

gj

What has this to do with Autism?
if the census-taker was Autistic, he would either be a basement dweller or hugely successful in the sciences.
If the mother was Autistic she would ask the census-taker to send her all his questions in writing and say goodbye.
If it's a test for me, Autism isn't required to be good at maths, as Autism isn't inherently related to numbers skills. Some Autistic people are brilliant at the law, language, finances or nothing at all.

So the Answer is... I'm both not Autistic for seeing this, and Autistic for being baited into a reply?

why does the sum have to be 13?
It doesn't say so in the text

"I'd tell you the sum of their ages but you'd still be stumped"

where is the 13?
This doesn't give me any information

Ahh, I get it.
It's the only one that appears twice

6 x 6 x 1
3 x 4 x 3

wrong, see

2, 2, 9

I DONT GET IT. EXPLAIN LIKE I'M FIVE

fuck you, Sup Forums is not for 5 yo.

good to see that there are still non-autists here. I thought only cancer left.

Not , but I'll be so kind.

> 3 children, product is equal to 36, whole numbers
>> a*b*c = 36 where a, b, c are positive integers
>> leaves you with a set of possible combinations of a,b,c

> telling you the sum wouldn't help
>> a + b + c can't be unique
>> only leaves you with (1,6,6) and (2,2,9)

> My oldest (..)
>> It's (2,2,9)