Why do these ideologies tend to bring out the social rejects of today's society.
Why do these ideologies tend to bring out the social rejects of today's society
the rejects of today's society are obviously dissatisfied with the status quo, and communism / fascism constitute the historically nearest alternatives.
Social rejects are usually looking for a purpose in life. A radical ideology suits them right.
All social rejects are brainlets who cannot cope with nuance.
Libertarianism falls under this aswell.
it makes them feel like they belong to a certain group, whether that's the "oppressed proletariat" or the "aryan master race"
people who are satisfied with their lives have no reason to believe in extreme ideologies that promise to radically change the existing order, because the existing order suits them well enough
being on the either side is normal here
Libertarianism is boring shit.
>He thinks National Socialism is all about muh white master race.
You can't sum up the whole ideology with that, trust me.
They're probably displeased with the direction the modern world is taking and are looking for alternatives.
>fringe people hold fringe ideologies
oh gee i wonder why
It's still the group the nazis considered themselves in and the reason why social outcasts want to be nazis
You might be confusing people who are nazis in name only and actual nazis
The social outcasts want to be nazis because they're tired of this materialistic, purposeless etc. society we live in. Being white is the tip of the iceberg, and anyone who's a "Nazi" solely because he's white is a retard.
collectivism is extremely dangerous and always leads to authoritarian mass murdering regimes
individualism and free markets are the only way
>anyone who's a "Nazi" ... is a retard.
fixed
That's just your opinion. :^)
It takes extraordinary individuals to rise so much over people and yet not use them for their own ends. There is maybe two or three per century. Roosevelt and De Gaulle come to mind for example.
That's why capitalism and free markets still have their own issues, like how money corrupt absolutely those who have so much they want to change the world according to their ideologies (or simply overdose to get the life thrills they cannot experience anymore).
I wish we were living in a Star Trek show. No power, no money, all pleasures.
...
non lefty here, but if a source isn't credible enough to be on wikipedia, i just can't take it seriously m8
>Trusting everything Kikepedia says.
Hey there r*ddit
what does Sup Forums think they're proving by spamming this
Daily Mail does have a clear agenda though, and has been known to stretch the truth to suit their needs.
>say im not leftist
>calls me leftist for questioning dodgy source
ok
thanks for better source though friend
...
FUCK OFF you Strasserist faggot, take that f*lthy symbol away from the Fuehrer.
no:)
Nothing except prove how much of a faggot he is
Libertarianism is not an outcast thing. There are many smart people supporting that ideology that know economics and lawmaking. When you understand the value that liberty has you can see that libertarianism is the best ideology. Your country was funded in very libertarian principles, you were the most libertarian country in your beginings and respected the constitution. Small government=best government.
And what does it lead to? :)
What do you mean?
Where does liberalism lead to?
Freedom
Where does too much freedom lead to?
Liberty
Weak people want to blame others for their situation.
How is this Sup Forums related? Go to Sup Forums faggot.
But you're strong as fuck amirite big boyy
Ah yes, great liberty
Crazy people are crazy. What is your point? The government should kill them? You can disagree with them but don't involve the government
Hh-how did you know? Totally...