So did Michael Jackson do it?

So did Michael Jackson do it?
Isn't it odd this comes out 10+ years after he's dead?
breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2016/06/21/michael-jacksons-child-pornography-collection-detailed-newly-released-police-report/

>Reading Breitbart

You actual faggot

I didn't know Michael Jackson browsed Sup Forums

>breibart
Fuck off Milo
Also not Sup Forums related

Here's what I don't understand

>evidence seized in 2003
>used as evidence in 2005 trial for the jury
>evidence isn't relevant to the molestation charges so is dropped
>absolutely nothing is done about a multitude of child and animal pornography found in a mans house, just because it wasn't relevant at the time

Can a law fag please explain

>not reading Breitbart

Enjoy your brain damaged leftist media.

He's right, kikebart is awful.

It's just pictures so what?

money and lawyers

it has the most traffic of any news site though

>falling for the old media meme

>'SHOCKING'

dat headline

white privilege in action

if michael had been a black man he would have gotten jailed

Yes the bbc, Huffington post and msnbc are much more reliable news sources

>10+ years

There's no fucking way, right?

Right?

>IT'S A QUESTION

someone somewhere wrote that the child pornography pictures were Victorian era pictures of nude or semi-nude children, and the others were pictures of tortured animals with faces of children placed on the animals.

basically, none if it legally counted as CP

>Being a beta orbiter of a greasy attentionwhore homo
>Muh leftist conspiracy

You're a moron.

he's right though. Kike is Jewish run website pushing for Jewish agendas. You'd think you Sup Forumstards out of all people would know this.

The allegation was seemingly that he used it to seduce boys, and evidently it couldn't be proved that was the case.

>no pictures

>every article says the same slightly worse thing then the article ends..

>all this shit was normie articled up a couple of years ago

yeah ok

Planted evidence.

>the bbc, Huffington post and msnbc are much more reliable news sources

yes. actually they are

>tortured animals with faces of children placed on them