Why would you dare suggest a revolution? We have all the guns

why would you dare suggest a revolution? We have all the guns

Use a map from 2016, not 2012.

...

Who the fuck is asking for a civil war?

And a low IQ. Not that worried.

Thank god someone else realizes this. Hmmm who would win?

>Half a nation of mostly successful, gun-owning conservatives
>Half a nation of mostly minority, closed-minded liberals, armed with trigger words and safe spaces

And yes, the far left liberal is closed-minded. Letting everyone do whatever they want while covering your ears when in the presence of conservatives is not open-minded. Retweeting and reposting every single LGBT update does not make you a better human being. And talking down to your opponents is why you liberals lost the election. Why would anyone change their mind to vote for your party when you spent a solid year calling conservatives racist, sexist, and deplorable?

Judging by this outcome, rightists are gonna lose.

Exactly, enjoy waging a 21st century war with out the intelligence to back up your troops.

because leftists don't think, they only feel... which gets them into these positions in the first place.

>Half a nation of mostly successful, gun-owning conservatives
Trailer park trash with no education and tattoos from Alabama and Mississippi. Unemployed or truck drivers or toilet cleaners.

>Half a nation of mostly minority, closed-minded liberals
Rich and educated people from New York, Silicon Valley, Washington and Boston. Hollywood celebrities, Wall street bankers, university professors, scientists.

...

Katy Perry, Cher and Beyonce

implying leftists aren't terrified of guns and think nanny police and government will always be there to save them.

Look who doesn't have a clue about american politics. Here in america, we don't judge by the popular outcome. Get over it kiddie.

They haven't finished counting all the votes yet.

> implying that conservatives are open minded

Why are liberal so violent anyway? When they loose, all they can do is wine and scream and terrorize buisiness and break windsheilds. You wouldn't be seeing this from the other side. Grow the fuck up.

obviously moreso than leftists, at least they didnt go on destructive riots when they didnt get their way when Obama was elected in '08 and '12.

He was talking about the amount of people who would mobilise for each side in the dumb hypothetical civil war OP was mocking, this has nothing to do with the electoral college....

The faulty assumption you made is that "liberals" don't own guns or unanimously agree with gun control. It's OK. No one expected you to be halfway intelligent. Your parents were too busy working for minimum wage to make sure you turned out educated.

>> You wouldn't be seeing this from the other side. Grow the fuck up.

What a load of bullshit

Probably because they can't stand your atrocious spelling and inherent idiocy. It's kind if like a robot hearing a paradox, they explode when hearing illogical notions.

can we start a revolution but be on the same side?

Obama isn't as horrible to the right as Trump is to the left. This comparison is shit.

No cause one side wants actual change and progression while the other just wants a reason to shoot people.

That would require conservatives realizing that they've been brainwashed by the very people who mean to enslave them.

nice point, no supporting dialogue. faggot

Sauce?

im a liberal and own guns. same for several of my friends. genuinely curious on percent of democrats who own guns compared to republicans who own guns

Daily reminder: only 20% of the population voted for Trump. You aren't as legion as you like to imagine.

You're the one with the burden of proof, not me.

Holy pot calling the kettle black batman

As someone who hates trump and voted for Hillary, I'd just like to say that these rioters/protesters need to calm the fuck down. There was so much shit slinging about the right starting a revolution, now they've done exactly that! Go home and move on, your (my) side didn't win, regroup and try again in 4 years OR become part of the process that doesn't involve you obstructing traffic with a cardboard sign, possibly on fire

Not to kill the discussion or to be the lame neutral, but it's kind of stupid to put 330 million people into 2 categories of "liberal" and "conservative". Literally NO ONE I know is 100% liberal or 100% conservative, everyone has at least one or two things they agree with on the other side, also there's like a 100 million Americans who would identify as centrist.

There's more people living in those blue areas than in the red areas Cletus.

liberal who owns guns here. It's really nothing special.

By that logic roughly 20% votes Hillary too. Not attacking your statement jussayin

>only 20% of the population voted for Trump
18,5% actually

True. But more people voted for someone other than Trump. He still won fair and square though.

At least they'll get the chance in 4 years. Hillarys Election would've seen the end of even remotely fair elections or the outright doing away with them.

and alot more easy to wipe out with just one nuke dipshit

>people with money and guns vs poor people who need help with everything

Kek.

conservatives are rational people. liberals are irrational and that's why they riot. If we spontaneously installed trans bathrooms i guess we would be predisposed to rioting too.

I did the math a few days ago. I figured it would change a bit in the last couple of days.

Republicans = 55%
Democrats = 32%

Democrats can more than adequately wage a war against Republicans

>poor people who need help with everything
Yeah cause Californians and New Yorkers and Bostonians and Hollywood celebs and Wall Street bankers and big corporation managers and CEOs and university professors and Silicon Valley techs are poor. Bitch please. Trump got all his votes in poor states, all rich states voted for Clinton.

Implying Mexico will not support liberals from the south.

>conservatives are rational people
You're a funny guy, Zeke.

good, i say the people who didnt vote for hillary or trump wage war against those who did

Not user, but right. That's the inherent issue with the electoral college. There are plenty of people who would have voted wither way but didn't bother because it wouldn't change the color of their state. Also, how many people really just hate both? A civil war would come down to values.
>poor people
>live in the most expensive and educated cities in the country
And then you argue the electoral college is to keep people in the city from electing officials race. You can't have it both ways dood.

auto-correct changed rational from retarded.

>conservatives are rational people

>believes in Jesus
>denies climate change
>denies scientific facts and believe the Bible

>rational

I would honestly sacrifice myself to take our technology and advanced culture away. Have fun watching your reruns of honey booboo on dial up.

holy fuck :P only you fucking retarded amerifags would call a liberal a leftist. If only you knew what the left wing actually did xD

on point OP

you have a biased view (obvious leftist), so you cant make a fair assessment.
also, dude isn't even in office yet, and hasnt done shit politically, so you have to precedent for your bigotry.

>thinks the universe and everthing, to include themselves, just sort of happened.

Yeah that sounds possible. Why are you rural butt farmers so retarded? It doesn't matter who is in the white house. Your buttfuck rural life will be unchanged. immigrants don't want to live in rural parts of the country. You can go about driving ford trucks all you want. It literally doesn't matter who gets elected for you.

>conservatives are rational people

People you have less education think they know more

Literally the opposite of rational.

And Canada and the rest of the world too. Nobody in the developed world would really support Trump except for some marginal right wing splinter groups. If Canada or the Netherlands or New Zealand got to vote in the US elections, Clinton would have had 80% of the vote (and 19% would have gone to Jill Stein and socialist parties).

Science doesn't say that.

OP, flyover states have zero population.

The south has a decent population but we already had that war and won.

Just stop with this stupid nuke shit. It makes you sound completely retarded. You are aware that the fallout would destroy the entire country, right?

best part is, you don't want your troops too smart. That causes problems.
It's not hard to operate a gun.

If there was a war between the left and right, the left would be fucked royally.

Like any of those "liberals" would get involved, they would flee or switch sides to save themselves. I would.


People are going to chimp out cause they're fucking stupid. This will happen on both sides. No war will happen. A new season of game of thrones will be happen or someone will die on walking dead and the kids will all forget about not getting their way.
The nut-job right will calm down, and proceed to rant about other things and everyone will continue to ignore them cause they're nut job far right wingers.
This is the new cycle of life, get used to it cause its going to suck.

Then neither can you. And if you can't, then you can't claim that one side is more prone to rioting than the other

people who study liberal arts think they know about all the sciences. how wonderfully educated an irrational liberal is. how i would love to be as clueless and sing-songy as them.

>coming to Sup Forums when you're not even supposed to be here
When will second worlders learn?

If that was actually the case, how would you know?

LMFAO you believe in god, go back to /pol you haven't seen shit on /b you newfag shitlord.

...

There is none. He's being a faggot and making shit up.

Fucking right wingers are obsessed with cucks. pretty sure they are worse than the closet gays who hate gays.

You guys simply want corporations to fuck you instead of other guys just admit it you fucking right wing CUCKS

Some conservatives are rational as are some liberals. There are dipshits on both sides dipshit.

what does it say you poetic chatterbox?

>people who study liberal arts think they know about all the sciences
>as opposed to people who didn't pursue higher education at all because book learning is for fags and jesus hates fags

>why would you dare suggest a revolution?
Republicans are more civil than liberals and don't go full retard by starting riots. Because only liberals have demonstrated violence lately, they believe they can over power the right.

That's what I thought

And people with no education to speak of think they know about the sciences. How wonderfully rational conservatives are. How nice it would be to live by being completely reactionary and emotional.

people who higher educated themselves think they know everything. Meanwhile, those who had to actually figure shit out know how the world works, and what is best.

>Implying half the country is Alabama and Mississippi

>Implying the other half of the country are Hollywood celebrities and Silicon Valley millionaires

wew laddie

life is going to be really, really hard for you after 10th grade.

Google it, moron.

>reactionary and emotional

Not him but that's literally the definition of liberals. Take shootings vs useless gun control for example.

The Republican here thinks that scientists don't have to "figure shit out" lol. Fucking hell.

>conservative
>emotional
pick one.

>people who higher educated themselves
Stop responding. You're obviously not intelligent enough to compete.

Would you hire a nuclear engineer who had to "figure shit out" instead of actually getting edcuated?

All the people that are afraid their government assistance is about to be cut and or heavily regulated

For a group of people who like to wrap themselves up in the American flag and preach about the constitution, other people exercising their freedom to assemble and speak freely sure does seem to trigger conservatives.

The guy I replied to made a similar categorization of the country. I just reversed it to show that you can easily make the exact opposite argument.

Google said vote for Hillary because every establishment is run by jews.

umm.. ya.. one side riots before shit happened, the other side never rioted over 8 years, you lose, go away.

>that moment you realize that people aren't pretending to be retarded and there really is poor white trash conservatives on Sup Forums

Sauce?

conservative = emotional
unable to adapt to anything.
>"waaah, other people's equality makes me uncomfortable"

bunch of whiny bitches

Burning businesses and looting and blocking traffic and dragging people out of their cars=/=freedom to assemble and speak freely.

All the subhuman rightwingers have been threatening one for about 6-8 years, so...

Precisely. They're like toddlers tbh.

The Newfag immigration epidemic is what made Sup Forums so liberal in the first place, we were literal Nazis before you faggots ruined this place.

You're still working under the unsupported premise, the premise that Obama and Trump are just as bad as each other.

Do you honestly think that conservatives haven't rioted in the past 8 years? How clueless are you?

OOO, a nuclear engineer, eh? someone who's got the greatest answer's to the world's energy needs! then why does the us only use 20% nuclear power and in doing so create biproducts MORE radioctive than when we started? I would not hire a nuclear engineer for any reason, but in a skilled field i would take the guy with experience rather than the guy who talked with his freinds about a book.