So he's no longer doing it. Keemstar threatened legal action and he backed out

So he's no longer doing it. Keemstar threatened legal action and he backed out.

Isn't it great how a drawing can land you jail time?

Me personally I would just draw, but since I'm not a drawfag... I guess that's it then.

Other urls found in this thread:

shadbase.com/archive/
youtube.com/watch?v=g40jgfJnswA
web.archive.org/web/20081019165828/http://www.iasd.uscourts.gov/iasd/opinions.nsf/55fa4cbb8063b06c862568620076059d/20a96a77c04347ed86257480006ae8c5/$FILE/Handley.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=z-IEjtyIpAE
youtube.com/watch?v=OfENN2G4NgA
youtube.com/watch?v=CvYIZGuIwZQ
youtube.com/watch?v=QlL9Td1xBOs
youtube.com/watch?v=YCd_hSktC2k
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

story behind this?

Pic pretty much explains it all. Shadbase was going to do this but then Keemstar threatened legal action so Shadbase backed down.

There is no legal action to take though. What was he threatening?

...

There is nothing illegal that he can file a suit against.

Shad's art is shit anyways.

Making porn drawing based on real child is illegal.

To each their own, I guess.

It's not porn you faggot.

I see nothing pornographic about that picture.

see

artists don't give a shit about consequences

nigga aint a real artist

>"giving head " isn't pornographic
How fucking retarded are you two

he was gonna draw it, but k-k-k-killer keemtard got bootybothered

Keemstar wont do shit hes a faggot who threatens legal action for anything

Nobody is giving head in that picture you illiterate cuckboi.

he is an excellent artist but like really really edgy and a faget like its just the stuff that he decides to draw that makes it shit

Wait wait I do not speak English and the translator translates to me half bad.

Tell me if the story is like this:

Someone drawing a girl from a photo with her father. In hentai porn drawings ..
And that father saw the drawing on the internet of the daughter and wanted to make judgment to the drawer?

But what about the father seeing pictures of other girls? Of other girls is ok but the no?

No

Shadman lost a bet about trump winning.
but there is no porn image, just a caricature of keen and his daughter

another question:

What program do you use to draw and paint?

I like the idea of walking on facebook and drawing girls that I find there ... hehe

Mmm but it's cool is not it? If I draw someone and put it in porn situations?

>If Trump becomes President, artist makes porn drawing of girl
>Father goes to police
>Artist does not make picture

Da comrade, you understand the speaking of words really good.

>But what about the father seeing pictures of other girls? Of other girls is ok but the no?
He is of being a hypocrite. There is no understandings of the irony that is of belonging in his words.

copyright infringement?

And what was the bet? only money?
What does the drawing look like then?

>Keemstar has a copyright on his daughter

i wish

Copyright what!? His daughter lmao!
Also even if that were a thing it would be protected as parody. That was a stupid post user.

I'd copyright his daughter, if ya know what I mean.

...

Holy shit, my bad.

i do not

He wasn't fucking finished, dumbass. That's the point; HE BACKED DOWN! He was going to draw her sucking Donald Trumps dick.

...

1 ha. Then an artist promises pornographic drawings of that girl if Trump wins.

2 Trump wins and the artist must meet and do the porn drawings of that girl ..

3 the father finds out and does not leave it.

Is that the story?

I'd infringe her copyright all night long.

honestly, if anyone was actually brave enough to draw that shit, he/she would become internet-Sup Forums legends overnight

FUCKING nice

Yes.

Shadman is a bitch. Keemstar is a pussy.

but it is legal to draw loli porn in usa?

Now I want to see the continuation of that drawing of the loli ... that someone continues it! please!

Id infringe her long time and copy right across her face! If you know what i mean.

> the father finds out and does not leave it.

Almost.

The artist makes the porn drawing, but Father is angry. Father wants to go to Government to make artist stop.

Artist stops.

how can a person be copyrighted

One kind user made a shoop to satisfy us. Not the best but I'll accept it for now.

Send it to Keem for lolz if you want.

shadbase.com/archive/

I'm watching it again and I've never seen such a good character loli created by western.

It is a shame that you can not use that loli ..

Just check out shadmans last post on his site, the nazi susie one, he mentions in the description or whatever that he decided to be a fag-puss after talking to some fucking literal youtube clown that has buttsex with keemstar.

you can copyright your likeness, or at least try to. I think there is precedent for restricting the use of your likeness.

>being this obtuse

to all Sup Forums! give me up until sunday for results, expect epic lulz! (and posibly me having to run for my life) if i dont deliver, the i shall be called mike the faggot, the biggest faggot of the all!

Fuck fagstar!

He should draw anyways, he cant prove its her daughter, give her a different name.

He drew a loli of hilliary clinton fucking trump and he backs out from this? What the fuck

Is it deliberate?

Yeah but it usually doesnt hold up in court well as history proves.

He should draw it anyway and not put his name on it and put it up anonymously on exhentai. When keemstar spergs out he has complete deniability.

shad is a shit, just like the keembrigade.

Who is Keemstars daughter

Mia Keemstar.

youtube.com/watch?v=g40jgfJnswA

>mfw getting caught up in youtube drama

very true, but maybe this dude didn't want to risk a legal battle. I don't know who the dad in question is, maybe he has a ton of money?

Shads style is pretty recognizable, unless he's actually able to draw in a style that isn't.

>he
>he
>he
cmon already, shad is a chick, a kinda flat hot chick.
someone post that pic.
i'd fuck her

This is why you shouldn't leave your room, user. You know it upsets you.

ShadMAN has a YouTube channel.

show proof

Except for the fact that he's some hairy shait from russia or ukraine or some potato-country like that.

Almost makes me want to have a daughter.

What is a Keemstar's daughter?


FBI visited him at home out of the blue for that
Look Sup Forums we can't let 'Keemdrama llama' take our boy 'Shadnot eligible for prisonman'

I know right? 10/10 pussy 24/7.

>FBI visited him at home out of the blue for that
No they did not.

You tell me

>FBI visited him at home out of the blue for that
[citation needed]

now draw this:

Idk man. i'm all for freedom of speech and all that but to use your celebrity as an artist to produce images of people's children in porn is kind of line-crossing

You can't get fucked by legal actions, it's just artwork for fucks sake

Only if you live in a nanny-state country that prosecutes your for thought crimes.

Shad lives in the US which at least holds some thread of dignity left to not jail people for drawing pictures.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA SHAD GOT KEKED INTO TEARS HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA :

twitch"."tv/shadbasemurdertv/v/101002631


START IT AT 27:00

What the hell are you smoking and how can i get some ?

>"I'm all for freedom of speech, except when I don't like it.."

cant find it now. was in a thread yesterday.

yea right, that is a nice image/camouflage she made up

>Shad lives in the US which at least holds some thread of dignity left to not jail people for drawing pictures.

web.archive.org/web/20081019165828/http://www.iasd.uscourts.gov/iasd/opinions.nsf/55fa4cbb8063b06c862568620076059d/20a96a77c04347ed86257480006ae8c5/$FILE/Handley.pdf

PCP and Crystal meth.

Copyright on the likeness of his daughter is a remote possibility, less remote because the dude plans to draw her engaged in sex acts. I think it is actionable. The dad probably would lose, but they could litigate for years.

>cant find it now. was in a thread yesterday.

>The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
>Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

A decent amount yes hes a famous youtuber. But he really is a waste of human life, he lies constantly and has been proved over and over again that he is hypocritical.

A good lawer can indeed sway a trail. But i still think it would be a long shot. All shad has to do is say "its not her" and that it was a coincidence.

A similar thing happened with the video game grand theft auto and a famous actor. She got crushed in court. She was saying a character on the loading screen was a direct depiction of her. Im glad she lost, we would be afraid to draw people at this point.

fuck
you really going to make me find what chan it was. one with a loli and a board call ?pco? Promotions? fuck haven't taken that much opium

youtube.com/watch?v=z-IEjtyIpAE

youtube.com/watch?v=OfENN2G4NgA

youtube.com/watch?v=CvYIZGuIwZQ

nope
not having it on my play list

Its a fucking cartoon. Get the fuck over yourself and your PC high horse bullshit.

Okay. I'm not following this horseshit drama, but I am slightly intregued.
Who is the dude on the phone, and why is shad shitting himself while talking to him?

If this is the case it looks like nothing bad came of it and didnt stop him from drawing loli as we can tell so fuck them.

>Britbong bashes Shad's art.
>Britbong barfs morals on Shadman.
>Britbong calls Shadman a weird fuck. A really weird fuck.
>Britbong speaks condescendingly to Shadman.
>Britbong bashes Shadman's supporters.
>Britbong ass rapes Shadman with Keemstar.
>Britbong virtually bitch slap's Shadman.

And Shadman just fucking sits there and takes it, sucking his cock all the way.

He's a massive fan, apparently.
Who is the britbong man?

She is so fucking cute.

youtube.com/watch?v=QlL9Td1xBOs

No. His artstyle is shit. He's gotten better though, Maybe in a few more years it'll be okay.

seriously. I don't get the cartoon shit - it's not her, even if it looks like her, so what is the big fucking deal?

Some SJW fag named Colossal Clown that regularly sucks Keem's cock.

>why is shad shitting himself while talking to him?
Because he's a bitch.

Read the conclusion, this court documentation is only on the preliminary hearing to see if the case has enough validity to goto trial, no conviction was made.

However I admit I was wrong in a sense, because they denied the dismissal on some "obscenity" clause that states if a artistic or written medium doesn't satisfy certain standards it can be classified as "obscene" and not protected under the First Amendment, which of course is retarded.

>Grotesquely exaggerated anatomy
>Generic western animu features
>excellent artist

Wow, this really is a cavalcade of douche-bags.

Do opinions bother you?

youtube.com/watch?v=YCd_hSktC2k

XD