/bleep/

[Jose Mitchell]

...

[Aaron Morris]

lol holy shit you have read like nothing

that's fine, we were all there once. first off get a proper understanding of the is/ought problem with hume(since you obviously don't understand this), then move on to 19th century phenomenologists(early husserl for intro, reinach, scheler, kazuko, heidegger has some phenomenological materials but also spends too much time on existentialist opinions like neechee, stirner's opinionated writing is auto-perspective based as well), then modern/contemporary realist phenomenologists, who once you have the linguistic context will literally explain to you how auto-perceptive existence(the only kind of existence you know) works.

babies fuggin talkin bout plato and neechee and *shudders* heidegger *pukes* as the most important philosophers in MY thread

[Elijah Bell]

^getting this mad that not everyone drinks the Kool aid
Lmao. I didn't even respond you its clear you'll never say anything that interests me

[Camden Hill]

once again you prove you have the mind of a child.

[Nolan Long]

dear rabit

rip when

[Andrew Smith]

whoever the lad was that said Field Records is a good lad

[John Reed]

thanks, lad. wasn't me but i didn't know about FR either.

[Jeremiah Russell]

Chilean house

[Adrian Martin]

feminist interpretations of nietzsche

[Julian Powell]

iss good label

youtube.com/watch?v=7qxiR8CSd8U