Who are the plebbiest classical composers?
Who are the plebbiest classical composers?
Andrew King
Other urls found in this thread:
Angel Martinez
Don't know about plebbiest but edgiest is Nietzsche
Parker Stewart
Wasn't Nietzsche a mathematician?
Isaac Watson
Nah he was chancellor of Austria
Joseph Hernandez
He was a nihilistic polymath
Sebastian Price
1. Satie
2. Chopin
3. Rach
4. Debussy
5. Stravinsky
Andrew Edwards
none because that's not how the western canon works
Joseph Roberts
B-but the gymnopedies are so pretty ;-;
Carson Rogers
Just because retards liked Satie's furniture bullshit does not mean he was pleb
Joseph Gonzalez
>He was a nihilistic
I'm triggered
Angel Sanchez
How do you determine what classical music is pleb?
Nathan Hughes
>what are adjectives
Jackson Walker
Look up "the best of -insert classical composer-" on Youtube
If it has more than 50k views, it's for plebs
Aiden Foster
According to this thread, by the people who listen to it, which is clearly a bad measurement factor
Jackson Myers
>Stravinsky
I bet you think Reich is pleb too you fucking inbred
Tyler Johnson
>debussy
Fuck you are self
Chase Rodriguez
he was a dead head
Asher Wood
haas
Kevin Gutierrez
You just named the only good classical musicicians
Carson Murphy
plebussy
Thomas Miller
Einaudi, Richter, Satie, Chopin
>Rachmaninoff, Debussy and Stravinsky
>Pleb
no user, it is you who are the pleb and probably only know 1 work from each composer.
Caleb Mitchell
Some of the more obvious names like Satie, Richter, Chopin, and Rachmaninov have been mentioned, so I'll go with a couple more controversial ones.
George Gershwin: The epitome of populism in the realm of western art music, even more so than Satie due to how influential he was. I know a lot of people like him when it comes to the classical side and Charles Mingus on the jazz side for combining aspects of the two genres together, but the end results from both have always been watered down takes on both styles of music.
Dmitri Shostakovich: A lot of his stuff was very by the books. He, to me it seems, gets more love for doing more traditional stuff in western art music at a time when it was pushing boundaries in a way it had never done before. The truly redeeming factor from him only really comes from his String Quartets. Anything else is a waste of time.
I understand the first three, but why Debussy and Stravinsky?
Gabriel Flores
Not a problem if it is more traditional (I don't think it is. Structurally he did things nobody else had done), just if it is good or bad regardless of "never done before" factor. This factor is a common attribute that means far less than people say it does.
Zachary Roberts
>The truly redeeming factor from him only really comes from his String Quartets
Couldn't have said it better myself
Liam Scott
Telemann
Schnittke
Rachmaninov
All British composers
Stockhausen
Samuel Morris
>Stockhausen
This is like saying Cage is pleb. You can be shit without being pleb