Political Compass thread

Political Compass thread

politicalcompass.org/

Post em

Other urls found in this thread:

politicalcompass.org/chart?ec=4.13&soc=-2.87
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

...

...

...

Also obligatory

...

Actually the Molotov thing is really on point. I'm btw.

Noice.

...

You couldn't get a cuckiest result even if you tried. You just balanced the agree and disagree (on purpose or not).

You have no strong opinions on anything. Gratz.

top kek, only 1 point off of hitler

...

...

It's weird because I was in the same place on the left last month.

holy shit lol

I think I would be a lot more right and up if it wasn't for the questions on religion. I'm pretty conservative across the broad, with a mix of libertarian.

Cuck

...

▲
▲▲

...

kinda surprised tbh

Do i lose

Funny results for a Marxist-Leninist-Stalinist.

Am I retarded

...

...

...

Even Marx thinks you should relax a bit there, comrade.

This gud?

I don't even remember half the questions lol

...

Nah, you an indecisive cunt mate.

...

...

real commie hours who up

...

...

And I voted for Trump.

Solidarity, comrade.

The first communist meeting will be next Thursday.

Report here:
935 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20535
EE. UU.

They will guide you to the appropiate room.

Too lazy, I'm one space right and six-seven spaces up

Thought I'd be a bit more fascist, national socialist here.

Economic Left/Right: -0.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.44

...

I'd say it's pretty accurate.

...

I can respect the top left square, at least some of them aren't pussies, but the bottom left is just the most useless idealist teenage fantasies, anybody in there needs to grow up.

That's not a very apropiate ideology for lazy people and chronic coach potatos I think. Well, they can always send him to a reeducation camp.

...

politicalcompass.org/chart?ec=4.13&soc=-2.87

bottom left square means "i have no idea what it takes to be successful in this world"

Surprised there isn't more "What's your political identity?" threads instead of the compass. I feel the compass inaccurately shows someone's views. Probably just because they're interesting to look at idk.

am I a fag?

I'm a quite successful marketer. Nice try, though.

But the bottom left square would include Elon Musk and Bill Gates.

Around the centres sure, but not very deep into the green.

Hey, if you say so... I'm over there and with nice well paid job and long term career plan, plus no debt, nice propierty house in a good area and a well thought out retirement plan where the correct amount of money goes to every month so it doesn't fall short when the time comes.

(I'm 29) - But sure. Let me prepare a couple Molotovs just in case.

Left-libertarian master race. Take that, fascists.

More accurately "I would destroy a society if I tried to run it".

To an extent, I agree. However, I was slightly in the green, only because I didn't feel some of the questions were absolutes. I tend to be more right wing on occasions, and as I mentioned in my post I voted for Trump.

...

...

...

yes

This guy gets it

Yeah, I think you are thinking more of what would be the red square. You don't need to be a convinced Anarchist to fall in the green one in this test as I've seen, the only "dangerous" one might be the red, which would represent old school Stalinist communism.

...

You're delusional. Both support strict regulations on corporations, think corporations should serve the common good, and strongly support equal rights.

Fascism is just right wing authoritarianism, may as well say you're just anti-right wing since communism is authoritarian as well.

...

Maybe too inciendiary for this board? kek

Apple who produces all their shit in thaliand? They want stricter regulations? Lol k.

Musk gets subsidies from the government anyway, he's brilliant but any social commentary he has is practically worthless.

Well the thing is all other squares have governmental structures that have proven effective in the past, what does the bottom left have?

He was a son of a bitch from the begining that earned his place by the shadiest means available. The result was to be expected.

I'm a dirty nationalist, I'm sorry Mr. Shekelbergstein. I will report to the nearest re-education camp.

>Apple
>Bill Gates
Full retard.

Obviously something new that should be carefully planned, as ALL other systems have proven to be flawed.

...

I think it's time for me to go to bed.

>Stalin
>good
I hope you really don't believe that.

Not every version of communism is necessarily authoritarian, ie. anarcho-communism, libertarian communism. Given, many are but not all. In any case, communism is the abolition of the state so full communism is anti-authoritarian, so really it's the socialism that leads to the communism that can be classified as authoritarian or not. I don't mean to sound like a dick or anything, just throwing in that not all versions are authoritarian. Either way I'm Marxist-Leninist-Stalinist sooo yeah I'm anti right wing in general.

Every system will be flawed, some more catastrophically so than others (bottom left).

communism isn't authoritarian in nature considering the basis of communism is a stateless classless society in which the means of production and property are communally owned as opposed to state or privately owned

revolutionary Catalonia was functional until franco shoved his spanish dick up their asses

see you on leftypol, comrade

>That would be Anarcho-comunism

Comunism, at least as we have known it is deeply authoritary. That would be, again, the red square.

So the only one we have not tried is the worse because....

What am I Sup Forums?

Every form of communism/socialism that has been done has been authoritarian. Only contrasting example that comes to mind is Rojava, which has a very small population.

But you're right, communism in the textbook sense is anarchist, but that is even stupider than authoritarian communism.

> revolutionary Catalonia was functional until franco shoved his spanish dick up their asses

From a Catalan Anarcho-comunist, cheers for that comment. Either you are Spanish or really interested in XX century politics.

Some good, some bad. He brought Russia into the 20th century with his 5-year plans and did not play games with reactionaries who were counter-revolutionary and he led the Soviet Union to victory in WWII despite facing superior war technology of the Germans. However I think we was way too paranoid for his own good and went a bit too far with his ease to execute anyone who just said "I don't know about that, comrade Stalin."

Ok

>Every form of communism/socialism that has been done has been authoritarian.
I will kindly refer you to this comment:

Stalin did nothing wrong.

A faggot.

You forgot the holodomor.

a homosexual

Cool, I get a free safe space :^)

About what I expected.

Oh I'm aware. Personally I'm not sure if full communism in the anarchist sense that Marx envisioned it would work because you have people who would at some point want to bring back capitalism and single-handedly own the means of production of a certain product, transportation etc. Ive thought long and hard about it and I feel that full communism would likely develop into anarcho-capitalism because people can be ruthless when it comes to wanting more more more so there would need to be a state in place to punish capitalists and prevent them from bring capitalism back. Which technI call would be socialism I suppose unless the government could be sort of an overseer on the general communes and aid in fighting capitalists.

Kulaks deserved it.

Sure. It's a sunny bay in a place called Guantanamo. It's lovely, they even have a McDonalds there.