Professor George Hawley of the University of Alabama...

Professor George Hawley of the University of Alabama, we the so-called alt-right want one thing above all else: for dialogue to take precedence over emotion. One should not have to fear being ostracized by someone simply for hurting a person's or group's feelings when expressing an idea.

For example, I feel the age of consent should be lowered to 12, that my hebephilia is nothing more than a social faux pas so acting on it ought not be illegal, and there should be special rules for pornography involving 12 through 17-year old persons allowing it to be legal under certain conditions.

I cannot express this in any forum that would have my identity exposed. Not because I am explicitly looking to rile the proverbial feathers, not because I have no legitimate argument to backup my beliefs, but simply because expressing an idea which breaches people's moralistic blockades would feel empowered and justified to violently berate me.

Fuck certain Trump flavors of the alt-right. Those ass clowns are just angry mongoloids looking for an angry gorilla to beat their chest as loud as they wish they could.

-Rick

Thanks for sharing. Now go away

My appoligies for not belching out another trap, cock r8, ylyl, kik, nazi thread. I'm sure a hundred or so will pop up over the next few minutes, just be patient.

Shit pasta fag

The problem with this is your last paragraph. There are so many flavors of the alt-right movement that it probably isn't a good idea to put all of us under one umbrella. However, that's the political buzzword of 2016 and this professor isn't going to get any grant money by trying to relabel us just yet, not until the dust settles and they can parse us up properly, I suppose.

All the alt right does is complain and use emotion. Logic would be not electing a con artist to the highest office in western civilization.

A bunch of people are responsible for that fuckfest. Blue collar democrats that never were concerned with progressive social issues but simply wanted trade and union protectionism (something Trump said he'll champion, at least the former), people that hated HRC, people that vote Republican as a matter of course, and yes, some of the angry assclow alt-right that just want to shout and scream.

There are however, believe it or not, that revile Trump but may actually like how he's helping to swing the political pendulum away from the PC culture.

I'm glad this is getting some traction.

Or maybe not

...

This is strangely hot.. Keep posting

Filtering porn to look artistic if my fifth favorite fetish. The rest are:
4. Redheads
3. Exhibitionism / Agoraphilia (Outdoor)
2. Urophilia (Pee)
1. Hebephilia (Early Adolescence)

jordyn is literally perfect

I have to resize these. They're under 20 MB yet "upload failed." This tells me they've banned this image somehow after previous posts where I've been banned for it before.

And the fascist alt-left have tried to silence the voices they oppose. Free speech be damned if it doesn't dovetails with their progressive agenda. Now the alt-left fascists are using threats and intimidation on the electors of the Electoral College. Constitution be damned if it gets in the way of their progressive agenda.

That's literally the definition of fascism. Fuck you alt-leftist.

*2MB

Yes and no. I wholeheartedly agree that the far left would have no qualms about throwing out constitutional protections, like freedom of speech, if it does something as mild as offend their ideological sensibilities. Nonetheless, the traditional right has sung that song too when they try to legislate morality or enforce religious doctrine.

The part where I must disagree is intimidating the electoral college. The electoral college was developed precisely so they didn't have to vote for who won a popular vote. The time it was created, people didn't have access to information like we do now; a majority of the population was uninformed. There was fear that an uninformed, populist guy from a state with a high population (like Virginia at the time) could win and make a mess of things in DC. The folks in the electoral college were the educated, the elite, who were charged with actually making the decision. So even if it goes against tradition to try to have the electoral college vote for someone who didn't win the electoral college vote (HRC won the popular vote after all), that very mechanism was the constitutional intent--so the "constitution be damned" doesn't exactly ring true here.

Very well stated, user. You have started me on the path to learn more on the subject.

However, the intimidation I speak of has been (allegedly) directed at individual electors.

I'm unaware of the alleged intimidation. If it's physical intimidation, then they're not just as bad as the people they claim to have a disdain for (the Trump supporters that were being violent at his rallies, etc), but even worse because they're the self-proclaimed champions of inclusiveness and tolerance so now they're hypocritical on top of it. It's like when a politician cheats on their spouse; it's bad either way, but it's even worse on the right since they're the ones who stroke the traditional family values cock. However, if the intimidation was political intimidation or whatnot, then it's fair game. I'm afraid I'm too ignorant on this particular matter to have a valid opinion.

TLDR;

I'm a pedophile and but I don't want to go to jail.

That's perhaps the secondary thing here, not the primary, and not pedo either.

If this were really the case I don't think the "alt right" would get so emotional about some of their own beliefs. The right is pretty PC too, they just don't call it that. For instance, if you propose that the appeal of radical Islam is a function of resource control and economics rather than anything inherently violent about the religion itself, right wingers start sounding pretty PC. "No! You have to call it 'radical ISLAM'" etc.

100% agreed. My argument later tried to deliminate and parse varying factions of the alt-right, with your example being the "where's my angry gorilla" bit.

...i was simply trying to highlight what I feel binds all of us togethet, the quiet and the loud.