Ask a pedo thread, round 2

Ask a pedo thread, round 2

Come on now, jeez

Other urls found in this thread:

npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124119468
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

What is it about small kids you find attractive ? Also were you as a kid

Do you recognize other pedos? I mean besides all of you raping an infant in a room at the same time.

I liked kids since I was a kid

They're cute and just perfect

Pedos
-don't rape
-don't automatically like infants

Where are your limits?

And no, I don't
We're just mostly normal people

Hurtcore I guess

Have you done anything...nefarious?

where do you find videos? pics gifs? webms?

HAve you ever tried being a pedo with someone
>>as in(greenactivategogo) a kid

when is too old for you

Aside from what OP said: I can tell sometimes. It's often with older guys who have lost some of their tact or ability to be covert. Also, I've known some people who I picked up on it from, though not explicitly discussed.

GET THE FUCK BACK HERE I HAVE QUESTIONS

I don't think so

I think you are looking for the dark net

>HAve you ever tried being a pedo with someone
That's kinda funny
No, not yet

I'd say they get unattractive when they need thingies to hold their boobies (actually not sure about the word, wow)

Ayy

do you find there is a particular cause for your pedophilia?, I have a friend with delusions (derived by the fact he was abused sexually), and he supposedly molested his little sister (judges couldn't tell if it was real of a hallucination), when I asked him why he did it he talked about his original abuse and tramua.

bump

Nope
I just fapped to kids when I was a kid, guess that sticked with me

>yet another "ask a pedo" thread
>TL;DR:
>it's normal for me to want to fuck children.
>it's society's fault for making it illegal.
>it's society's fault for damaging children by telling them they're victims.
>it's society's fault for condemning children who want to sexually experiment with themselves and others.
>i'm just an innocent user stigmatized for what's biologically correct.
>muh pedo rights

i have tried the darknet and yielded nothing. i just want some videos!

>I think you are looking for the dark net
It's a myth. Translation: if you don't know don't find out.

>I'd say they get unattractive when they need thingies to hold their boobies (actually not sure about the word, wow)
C'mon user, whats wrong with some soft, young bra stuffers?

This pasta again?

this thread again?

It's not as repetitive and generic as you think though.

BRA
That's the word, thanks
I just very much prefer cute little nipples to suck on

huh short answer, ok ill take it i guess.
have you ever acted upon or felt a strong urge to act upon your desires?

yes, it very much is.
always the same questions.
always the same responses.
always the same anons trying to score child porn.
always the same "boo hoo i can't handle these feelings i need help" bullshit

I had the urge
It happens in stressful times, especially if I didn't get to see any kids for a long time

So submarine duty would be dangerous, if not hilariously ironic?

that's what Sup Forums is
trap thread
ylyl
why can't atheists define athesim
generic porn thread

nothing new is ever posted on Sup Forums

Ecclesiastes (written by King Solomon, King David's avatars son) sex:

There Sup Forums nothing new under the Sun, except the fags on Sup Forums

You're not a real pedophile until you've banged a kid.

You must earn that title

>everyone else is doing it, so why can't i

Avatars:bastard

Why bother with desires you cannot act upon without damaging the whole of humanity? I have found better pleasure in finding new and exciting hobbies, and learning them has been a lot of time well spent.

I guess?

I didn't even know! Thanks man
That's it guys
I'm not a pedo anymore, thread's over

No, no it's not...

acebook.com/Flowinglineslandscape/
these guys lol total pedos. turns out they touched a girl while at someones house dooin work

I can look and nobody's harmed
I bet ya, I could have sex with a kid and nobody would be harmed

Well let me address all your claims.

>always the same anons trying to score child porn.
I have never participated in one of these threads for CP. The CP deliveryman already hit another thread today. Also, there are other places with easily available CP if someone really wanted that. Most of my interaction here is about staying away from that.

>always the same "boo hoo i can't handle these feelings i need help" bullshit
What's wrong with that? It's not easy to be viewed as subhuman for something you didn't choose. It's not east to be in a constant struggle with your own self.

>it's normal for me to want to fuck children.
Well I don't particularly want to "fuck children", but my feelings are pretty normal for me being that they were natural and not something created.

>it's society's fault for making it illegal.
Yes. Society is stupid sometimes, but no sex with prepubescents is honestly a reasonable societal stance.

>it's society's fault for damaging children by telling them they're victims.
It's society's fault for viewing everything through the same lens. Some are victims of rape. Those groomed and manipulated are victims too. Every case is not the same though.

>it's society's fault for condemning children who want to sexually experiment with themselves and others.
I fully agree with this. When the desire to participate in sex is reached naturally, it should not be condemned. I questioned this when I was 12 wondering why it would be so bad for someone who cares for me to enjoy sex with me. As with my previous point, all things are not universal in this regard.

>i'm just an innocent user stigmatized for what's biologically correct.
I will not apologize for attraction to adolescents. I will not apologize for the fact that I could fall in love with a vibrant young person. But I'm also not innocent by my own judgement though I have never had inappropriate contact with any child.

There's a book for you. Is that new?

>Is that new?
no, it isn't.
the same bullshit excuses.
>society sucks.
>stop viewing me as evil
>waaaaaaah

Thanks for defending the thread
But it's no use feeding the normies, man
It's not worth it

Do you ever want to get therapy? Do you think it can be safe, or beneficial?

Nah I feel pretty good the way I am

For others it might help though

Well it was more me saying it for me than it was for the anti tbh

Not OP, but yes I have thought of therapy. No, it may not be safe due to mandatory reporting laws. I think it could be beneficial to have a real human to talk to face-to-face, honestly though it's something I'd rather share with someone I could have a more personal connection with.

bump

>mandatory reporting laws
This is so fucked up, isn't it?
If I understand that correctly it basically means being a pedophile is a crime now.

>therapy

>implying there is help for this kind of thing

>it basically means being a pedophile is a crime now.

no, but that's what the pedos want you to think.

Yeah if you admit attraction in general and you are around any child ever, a therapist may report you as a potential threat to a child so that they have no liability in the event you did something and law enforcement finds you talked to a professional about it. It is my understanding that if you talk about any attraction to a specific person, it's pretty much a guaranteed reporting. But each state is different in the U.S. and I don't know all the specifics.

They're not going to cure it, and the aversion therapy stuff is just as dumb as gay aversion therapy, but there has to be advice for how to deal with being hated and ostracized for something you can't fix.

How old is too young?

Toddlers are too young for me
So about 3

>has to be advice for how to deal with being hated and ostracized for something you can't fix.
yeah. stop fucking telling everyone you're a pedo.

But 4 is fine?

lol. then what? get into a loveless marriage? date people with hormonal problems? become a hermit? kys? do better.

>get into a loveless marriage?
people do it all the time.

>date people with hormonal problems?
people do it all the time.

>become a hermit?

>kys?
people do it all the time.

>do better.
lol trying to grade me now...
typical Sup Forums

Usually

If they are not baby fat-y anymore and can talk in a mostly understandable way they're good

Not OP, but love is ageless to me. I think I fell in love with my sister when she was 2 or 3. As far as sex goes, I don't like the thought of grooming or jamming something in a spot that is not ready, so she has to be older for me to go there.

If 4 is the youngest you'd go for, how old do they need to be for you to stop finding them attractive?

>fell in love
>when she was 2

old enough to resist grooming

Hi, Chris. Take a seat.

When they get annoying, moody and gross as teenagers usually

That's a case by case scenario and beside the point though since we're not talking about love but physical attraction

Probably around 12 or 13

enjoy that route then.

enjoy being a fucking pedophile you freak

I find 12 to 15 to be the most attractive. But, then, that is pretty much normal across cultures and history.

>ITT normies tell pedos what pedos are feeling even though they don't know shit

user was vague, so I hit on emotional and physical attraction both. Also, am I the only person who is drawn to children over a desire to love them and be everything they could ever need?

It's true user. I love her still, she is special, and no one can replace her. The hair combing, cheek caressing, "ouchie" kissing, snuggling, back scratching, long kisses on the forehead, etc; all these emotional things I would take over sex any day.

thou doth protest too much

There's a good reason why it's not a good idea for someone to fuck a 12 year old, even if they're the same age. Wanting to fuck and doing are different animals.

npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124119468

They lack the ability to adequately make decisions with regard to future consequences. A lot of their brain will ignore any doubt they have because they lack the frontal lobe connections for that to have any real impact on their decision making process. You wouldn't be allowed to fuck someone that's had a partial frontal-lobotomy for the same reason; they lack the cognitive capability to have informed consent. It's backed by motherfucking neuroscience. Granted, as a person gets to be around 16, those connections have become much better, but they're not at their peak until the age of 25. 18 is typically the age where things are considered "good enough" and if you look at some of the charts in the article used in the source of the one I linked, you get a pretty good visual representation of what I mean.

The consequences of sex are sometimes hard to suss out for some people, but think about what happens when condoms fail, birth control isn't taken as it should be, or simply fails. At least 2 lives would be ruined in the case that a 12 year old girl "forgets" to take the pill, decides to keep the baby, and can't support it for shit because she's uneducated and the father is nowhere to be found. There's also PID, and other STI related complications that a 12 year old wouldn't consider when their loins become inflamed and moistened. Lower the age of consent, and benevolent pedos that swear up and down they're good for children wouldn't be the only ones manipulating these essentially functionally-retarded people into sex. They're not mentally ready for it and even without the social stigma there are problems with declaring open season prior to AT LEAST the age of 16.

>cont'd
I respect that you did state that society is reasonable for not wanting people to fuck their prepubescent children, but even pubescent kids/teens aren't really capable of making rational decisions in the heat of the moment and there's a neurological reason backed by sound science that we don't typically let them make decisions that can put other lives in harm's way.

I like you, you are a good guy/gal

>They lack the ability to adequately make decisions with regard to future consequences.
i know ppl in their 20s when that problem. but to be fair, they really shouldn't be breeding, either

Where can I find other pedos, I want to share my little girls panties and pics while we jo

no thanks, officer

The same argument can be made for saying 12 year olds shouldn't be allowed to cross the street. It's subjective, except that evolution put the sex drive at the age it did because it was more successful than not to put it there.

And there's the problem

welcome to Hansen's Dateline investigations on how to catch a pred. Do you do this often?

That is sick, now fuck off to a deepweb discussion board.

then you have literally no idea what "being in love" actually means.

>muh evolution

>Muh non-rebuttal.

That's not typically the case, though. We're talking law of averages here, not outliars that should be individually evaluated for mental disorders to have their competence put to the test to protect society. People with heavy drug addictions, for example, make shitty decisions and require treatment before they can become productive, rational members of society. I don't believe a crack addict is mentally competent.

>implying it's worthy of a rebuttal

I can see what you are saying, but I think it is too generic. At 12 I think I made better decisions than some adults I knew then and know now. I was respected by adults for my maturity. I would have had sex with my mother if it was socially acceptable and on the table too. And I would have fully understood what was going on.

Do explain how you drew that conclusion user.

>implying you could come up with one when everyone knows you cant.

>implying the implications was even implied

>implying anything on the intenet is worth the argument

>Do explain how you drew that conclusion user.
because you're on Sup Forumsullshitters

Having my feelings of love trivialized hurts me greatly.

then you'll have to learn to live with the disappointment.
just like my parents did.

>implying your bullshit now isn't arguing.
>implying the time it took you to write all this shit is somehow less than writing your rebuttal if you actually fucking had one.

>implying i'd give you the satisfaction of a proper rebuttal now that you're basically begging for it.

implications!!!

Yet you are still here..

>ARGUE WITH ME!

>Yet you are still here..
i'm killing time at work.
doesn't mean it's "valuable" time
doesn't mean it's actually "worth it"
>but keep trying

If there's still anyone with actual questions

OP is still here...

Just saying, feel free to continue implying tho

Are you a real pedophile or just a pussy one?

You know, have you ever fucked any children before?

>because this totally wasn't asked already

Your thoughts on the question posed here OP ?