What is the big big fucking hubbub regarding this?

What is the big big fucking hubbub regarding this?
I like AC's body of work but never got into this.
Repetitive and lacking substance; derivative.

Hmm, yes. Shallow and pedantic.

>why p4k aoty is so popular on Sup Forums
really

Listen to it again

top plebeian

this is better than any solitary AnCo album

since when not liking repetitive, lacking substance, derivative music is plebeian?

because it's not repetitive, lacking substance or derivative music
but you're a pleb for thinking so

>because it's not repetitive, lacking substance or derivative music
it actually is
stop droning p4k already

>it's not repetitive, lacking substance or derivative
how so?

>stop droning p4k already
I'm not
I'm droning Scaruffi :^)

Yes, it's overrated.

so you're just as obnoxious as a p4k drone, but you're also pretentious

nah I'm just baiting I don't even like the album that much

pretty much every scaruffi drone

i forgot people weren't allowed to like things p4k reviewed positively

>mfw this became one of my favorite albums before I even read the fucking Pitchfork review
>mfw who the fuck even remembers what score Pitchfork gave it
seriously kys

>tfw your favourite album is repetitive derivative garbage with reverb
seriously kys

the only reason this album got so hyped on here is what p4k thought about it
you didn't even have to visit p4k to be a p4k drone, most of Sup Forumscore are albums that people from p4k loved

this album is fucking beautiful and you're a fucking straight up dummy if you don't see it.

beautiful ≠ good

wdhmbt?

wtf am i reading?

not every beautiful album is good
not every good album is beautiful

you understand that music can not be objectively good, correct?

music is objectively not good when it's repetitive and derivative
this album is beautiful, but not good

repetition is not a flaw, it is just something you apparently don't like

Never listened to Person Pitch but repetition is not inherently bad, nor is music that is derivative/unoriginal.

Saying either of those things are OBJECTIVELY bad is an incorrect assertion.

YOu may think you've triggered me (fagboy), but all you've told me is that you have bad taste. you see, in saying that you like (animal) collective, I have already judged you an insufferable pleb, so when you tell me that PP is "lacking substance" it does not bug me in the least, because I already know your opinions mean nothing to me. Got me?

wtfdhmbt?

Yes, Mr. I don't like things p4k likes because I don't like p4k. Do you have any idea how stupid that is?

Its the best AC related thing ever released, including AC.

You had to have been there

One of the greatest musical achievements of the last 20 years. His arrangements and vocals alone are transcendent enough to solidify its great merit.

it's like saying: i don't like this guy and he likes chocolate so now i don't like chocolate. that's how stupid

shit bumps in le whip m8

>repetitive

Not a bad thing, see >Lacking substance

The compositions are multifaceted, dense, and repayable.

>derivative

Literally name another record that even sounds close to this.

It sounds like krautrock crossed with minimal techno. I mean, that's pretty cool. Even saying that is cool. It's like the antithesis of the three-piece-rock-band, the Strokes type band, the shit NME likes, it's on a completely different planet. It's a pretty good record but it was also a direction music could trend towards, and it did

youre mixing up "repetitive" with "atmospheric"
>this album is beautiful
so you understand the atmosphere of it at least....