Can all of music be placed on this chart?

Can all of music be placed on this chart?
Also post yours

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=h3JEkDShKoc
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Yes but only because those dimensions are incredibly broad terms

Red: Butt Metal
Blue: Super technical Math Rock
Green: Indie Pop/Twee
Purple: Twinklely Math Rock

accurate?

By politics

Fuck off

Well ur a mr.grumpy pants ;)

>Blue: Super technical Math Rock

Four letter band names

Red: Coil
Blue: Korn
Green: Toto
Purple: Beck

>this isn't harsh and complex
youtube.com/watch?v=h3JEkDShKoc

Switch Coil and Korn so you don't look like a fucking retard

Saw the thumbnail and came into the thread hoping for an ebin political slapfight.
Anyway, where does prog fit?

Probably center : far right

Prog would be on the right, mostly nearing the bottom.

>korn and beck
>complex
??????

depends, king crimson would be more harsh and complex than pink floyd for example
but probably center and halfway to the right I'd say

I just realized there's an axis missing and the graph isn't complete
Depressing - Joyful(Euphoric?)
So the chart should 3D. I think that would make it complete

Red: Rush
Blue: King Crimson
Purple: Genesis/Yes
Green: Jethro Tull
Eh, not sure on Red. Rush is hardly prog in the first place.

updated

Sounds really good, thanks user

But post-punk is commie music

...

the red part is pretty unlike prog honestly. if it's fundamental then it's not jazzy / avant-prog, if it's harsh then it's not symphonic either
green could be pink floyd too desu

>Talking Heads
>either fundamental OR smooth

this is nice, thanks for posting

>Talking Heads
>complex or harsh

are you fucking stupid?

...

>elton john being technical
I cant tell if youre trying to be funny or just mentally ill

It's more complete now

>I have only heard two or three elton john songs: the post

I actually like this one, except mbdtf i think youre overrating that one a bit

Those are emotions and are subjective, really shouldnt be a part of it. What we have is fine because were dealing with non debatable qualities

Probably right

Something tells me you've never listened to Remain in Light or, really, any Talking Heads album.

>Remain in Light
>Harsh or Complex
I'll give you complex due to some structures, even tho technically they aren't complex at all. But harsh? Are we talking about the same Talking Heads?

You could say complexity is subjective too. Rythmic complexity or sonic? I think the general mood (happy/sad) of a song is often pretty clear. Often just as the artist intended. You could change it to consonance and dissonance so it's ""technical""

also: I could agree if by complexity you mean challenging to listen

...

Not even remotely funny

You'd be surprised how many people could actually like this on those Sup Forums memes facebook pages

> hasn't listened to Yank Crime
Come on lad

>Yeezus and 808s
>complex

what the fuck has happened to Sup Forums where people are new to drive like jehu?

Trout Mask isn't "complex" though, it's just fucking weird. different != complex

you're wrong

>being this pleb
Just because (You) don't understand it doesn't mean it looses all credibility.

Assuming the axiom of choice there exists a complete basis for any vector space. And assuming that harsh/smooth and fundamental/complex are perfect opposites then we got a subspace in the vector space of all possible descriptors of music.