/classical/

This is a good breviary -- columbia.edu/itc/music/ito/history/

youtube.com/watch?v=_y7IwSbQWQk
youtube.com/watch?v=U_rlk4H-DQ0
youtube.com/watch?v=9IoKkbO6Sdc
youtube.com/watch?v=c7mjvbci0OM

Shit performance, as usual. Why do you think the orchestra completely covers up the piano when the piĆ¹ mosso section begins? Exactly, it's because Weissenberg can't play those passages to save his life. The cadenzas are even worse. The only one other than Rachmaninoff himself who could play this concerto is Horowitz when he was young (old Horowitz played it like rubbish).

Here, this is a proper performance of the No. 3: youtube.com/watch?v=4CARUE500Zw
(Unfortunately several sections are cut from the recording.)

It's called picking up a pencil and then writing notes down on paper

take a course in music theory, the rest should be autonomous

jesus christ this is some fucking good shit

horowitz is the kind of pianist who, when he plays a piece, it's so fresh and innovative that it's as if you're hearing the piece anew again

Kastle please go

Literally who? No matter: I'm right, you're wrong. End of story.

All quite good, though I prefer Carmignola's version of BWV 1019 or this
youtube.com/watch?v=g1Proid60n4