There is nothing wrong with Male Circumcision

There is nothing wrong with Male Circumcision

Prove me wrong (Pro-tip: you can't)

Other urls found in this thread:

medlineplus.gov/ency/article/000862.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Prepuce
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

inb4 insecure uncut fags

"Intactivists", they call themselves

leave my fucking braincells intact.

So you're saying that you can't be possibly proven wrong? That means you're retarded.

wew nice counterargument

You're not wrong. 2 of my three kids are circumcised. Mom wouldn't let me circumcise the last one. Guess I'm beta. His dick is stinky af. and he is under 4yo. Plus there is this too.
medlineplus.gov/ency/article/000862.htm

Idk. Cutfag here. On one hand, it sounds a little more convenient for washing, but I've never experienced the alternative, so my frame of reference isn't exactly valid. I kind of wish I could feel what it's like to cum with that extra part of my penis still there. Damn shame I never got the opportunity, but meh, it's not the end of the world.

Balinitis aka headrot

Implying that there was an argument to counter

It's very, very unnecessary. I wouldn't want to be cut, that's for sure. Fapping wouldn't be the same.

Pro what OP?

I can see the benefits, but how do you wank?

>There is nothing wrong with adult male circumcision.
FTFY

Underrated post

alright so... your assertion is a simple one:
"There is nothing wrong with Male Circumcision"
And you claim that I cannot prove you wrong.

What does it take to prove you wrong? Providing an example of a thing that is "wrong" with Male Circumcision.

Example 1: Jews invented circumcision.

QED

I prefer my dick to look like most of the dick drawings out there

...

There's nothing wrong or right about it, it's a matter of choice.

Might as well cut off your ears too. You can still hear without them.

I found the insecure cutfags!

...

>

>implying

...

...

Yes it would

do you people not use your hands?

does the foreskin have the ability to fuck the dick with no outside help? please assist my understand

>There is nothing wrong with little baby male circumcision.
FTFY

Whats the problem with jews?

I do not need lube and fapping doesn't hurt the glans.

The same problem that christians have, and muslims have. They dick over the people that don't convert to their religion. Literally and figuratively

is that the colosal titan ?

That would be elective mutilation though. Phimosis is a good reason for circumcision, but isn't detectable before much later in life. Putting a baby through intense pain and a risk of infection due to wearing diapers, for aesthetic reasons is just stupid.

>Aesthetic Reasons
>Smegma and Ease of access
>A E S T H E T I C

mind if i circumcise my kids on that edge?

Neither do I

Excuse me, how is pointing out the exclusionary cultural norms of religious people edgy?

Are you denying that Jews have worked together throughout history to create monopolies and drive their competitors out of business?

Are you denying that Muslims kill people just for not being Muslim?

Are you denying whatever the f*ck Christians have done that nobody seems to care about since it holds global plurality?

Smegma can be washed away and ease of access is already there if the dick doesn't have phimosis.
Are you gonna cut off your ass or armpits for being smelly, or do you wash them like a regular person.
The most common reason I've met for infant circumcision is "I just want him to look like me/his father". That sounds rather aesthetic to me.

But you have nothing to grab on to. You're just fucking pulling the glans up and down and the glans is sensitive. By the way, I have no problem with smegma at all.

> f*ck

this board is for adults only

See, the ass provides cushioning when sitting. The foreskin does nothing.

You can grab onto your dick and slide your hand up and down you fucking mongoloid

The foreskin protects the glans from dirt and friction, maintaining a sensitive sexual organ.
It also functions as a natural lube trap, that stops the wetness from leaving the vagina and can give the woman a better sexual experience.
These are just a few of the functions, you can go google the rest.

The foreskin is there to protect the glans.

>stops the wetness from leaving the vagina

English isn't my first language and it's the middle of the night here, sue me.
It keeps the natural female lubrication inside of the vagina, avoiding excessive friction.
See there, it's fixed, are you gonna engage with my argument or will you keep correcting my writing?

No, i'm really not

GTFO forignfag

What could possibly go wrong, when reminding everyone that it just takes some religious nutbags and old hags to put your dick to a knife.

>forignfag
Gives me shit for my writing.

...

I can smell it from here

i would kill my parents if they had mutilated me. glad they are christians.

Not very good christians if you end in Sup Forums seeing the penises of other fags.

but i'm not watching those threads, you know i can choose what thread i watch?

Jesus was circumcised.

So taking medical advice from a bronze age religious nut is a good idea?

of course he was, jesus was a jew king.

I loss a fingernail forever and I'm happy for don't have to cut these annoying fuck anymore.

i scalped my head scalp for same reasons.

>pro-circumcision
>pro-tip

pick one

Why would uncut fags be insecure? We have our entire penis in tact. We're also not the ones that bring up the debate constantly.

Actually both sides of the argument bring up this topic. The insecure cutfags who are fishing for confirmation of their bias and overzealous uncutfags who act like all circumcision is the breakfast of the devil. My only point of contention with circumcision is doing it to babies who have no way of consenting. If you needed to be old enough to consent, to get this elective surgery, most of the problems in this issue would go away.
Except for the dwindling supply of stem cells for the make up industry I gather.

Wha..?

Fucking skinhead.

Bonehead would be more apt. If he actually scalped himself, there would be no skin on the top of his head.

Mine was an accident.

>circumcision isn't wrong
>pro tip
Choose one

Mine was an accident.

Growing up in a large multicultural city I would say in my experience, in high school especially the cut fags always brought up the subject constantly and randomly. They would always try and bring up how gross being uncut is as if they were trying to convince themselves of something. If I lost part of my dick I'd be insecure about it too.

typical uncut Yuropoor benis

"Wrong" You're talking about morals , and morals are subjective

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Prepuce

It's a coping mechanism, not entirely in their control either. Somewhat along the lines of "If my parents claim to love me, what they did to me can't be mutilation. There must be something wrong with foreskins".
It's basically a way to deal with the residual trauma of being born and suddenly being in huge amounts of pain just afterwards. Their first interaction with the world is finding out that it is a painful, horrible place. Then imagine being told you went through that pain for your own benefit years later.

is that the head of your dick?

dude i think you have phimosis, and it's swollen your dick, you actually need to get it cut

You are in this thread seeing the penises of other fags.

A lot of Holy Prepuces around the world?
Jesus have a lot of penises?

nope, I'm a happy and healthy cut american.

..Except the fact people'll think you're a filthy fucking Kike.

Nothing wrong with a little perinatal trauma.

There is definitely something amiss here. Your glans is not fully exposed, you have tight foreskin leftover from a circumcision where not enough skin was removed.

MGM is just as wrong as FGM, and for the same reasons.

Gives you hair on your chest I gather.
Also add in some random beatings.
Nothing teaches little boys they are inherently worthless like circumcision and beatings.

Mfw

...

Underrated post

You don't understand... Instead of your hand rubbing the skin, and your hand moving back and forth on the skin, your hand stays in contact with the same skin, and the skin itself glides back and forth over your penis and glans.

that is not my penis sir. That is the penis of an uncut Yuropoor. This is also not my penis, just another illustration of why getting cut is important

good one

Feels good man

I cut off my arms and legs so I don't have to move them anymore. Feels good typing this with my dick.

...

It's hygienic to be cut. Cut = clearly better.

But is it cut or uncut?

...

...

Both.

It is filled with about 20k nerve endings which obviously influence sensation, plus it acts as a protective sheath that keeps the glans (dickhead) from getting calloused and desensitised itself

if people want to do it, fine, but there is no real justification to do it to an infant or child, it should be left up to the individual to choose once they are of sound mind according to society ala legal age to sign contracts and whatnot

don't let women dictate your cock you beta faggots

...

He'll thank you when he's older and actually has feeling on his penis

Circumcision is fucking dumb. You're just getting rid of nerve endings, and i'm guessing fapping without lube just isn't possible. If you know how to fucking wash you won't catch anything bad.

Unless you live somewhere with no hot water and soap, the hygiene benefits are negligible.

...

Nothing wrong with a calloused and desensitised penis.
Means a larger sexual intercourse.

Quality over quantity my man

having said that
premature ejaculation exists across the board, its more of a mental problem

I'm cut and it's real difficult for me to ejaculate by getting a blowjob, also the tip of my cock is rubbing around inside my underwear and unless I get a specific kind it irritates my cock.

Being cut sucks ass and it wasn't even my choice.
Sure I don't have to clean the smegma from my cock, but that's where the pros end.