Sup Forums and manchildren absolutely BTFO
youtube.com
Another Ghostbusters 2016 review
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
twitter.com
twitter.com
Oh, he looks trustworthy.
>film
he means flick
Not so fast...
i didn't realize the shermanator was reviewing flicks these days
Reminder that Sony has in the past been sued and settled out of court because they invented a fake movie critic to shill their films.
Ok, but i wont watch them, because they see what views reckless becomes and want their part of the pie.
>I legitimately and genuinely loved this film
who are you trying to convince here? me or sony?
>a grown man with a cabinet full of toys
yeah this guy is to be ignored
>it's so FUN and quirky
yeah fuck this faggot
I've been watching this guy's vids for years he's based
the toys are just props for Either decoration or
showing that he knows stuff from nerdversum or franchises.
Guess the last point
I'm sure this guy has a great extended review in tumblr
I don't know but I can't by those lips he's sacked a dick or two
>tfw you catch a sweet break and get to see a movie early to review it for your thus far unknown youtube channel
>tfw the autism parade attacks you for your genuine opinion
>"Only man babies hate the new Ghostbusters"
>Currently only a man baby likes it
nu male mega cuck
>339 subscriber
>All that manchildren tier video
She wasn't street smart she was smart about the streets
Thats why he made now the ghostbusters movie.
He saw that someone got half a million views than and now wants to promote his channel.
This video seems to be his biggest view video.
Thats why i wont view it. I cant belive he saw it, just jumping the waggon.
hey sony
Thanks Quentin
...
>review of a movie is downvoted to oblivion by the public before the movie is even released to the public
>80 views
>1 week ago
lmao
is that supposed to be Cuckmann's slightly less retarded younger brother??
>those videos
>those views
just stop at this point. this is not an occupation or a career
thousands of people do what you do better
just stop
Welcome
Every channel started somewhere.
>If I could eat half his diaper, I'd die happy
wtf I hate youtube now
what did he mean by this?
Kek he really does look like feig's kid. Such a punchable faggot face.
>those view counts
Oh. It all makes sense.
Why does his tv still have the energy star rating tag on it?
Why is this so accurate, why do these guys all look and think the same.
>en.wikipedia.org
Based.
>I was tricked like a retard by one of those little "Film Of Th Year!" snippets on the movie poster, gimme back my 5$ dollar cause I'm not responsible for my own stupidity
Sony: 1 - Idiots moviegoers: 0
>play 5 seconds of video to confirm he has an effeminate faggot voice
>he does
So whos actually gonna go see it? I might. The cast is growing on me. Also Dan Aykroyd who keeps saying in interviews that the original fans should like it so idk
AHAHA
>people shrieking "paid review" just because he liked the film
You guys are no better than the SJWs that shriek "misogynist" for a person disliking it.
jesus, this makes me want to get Lasik and shave
good thing I don't have any social media presence and I'm not white
Because people like to play it safe and follow trends, from fashion to politics. We're all guilty of this at some point in our lives.
If you go see it, make sure to keep eye out for a product placement of his vodka
Clickbait is cancer
Stop being new.
The original cast are one of two.
>Executive Producers
>Forced by threat of legal shitstorm
I'm confused, he says youtube gave him the chance to go see the movie? He has like no subscribers, I think my abandoned channel has more subscribers than he does. He sounds like a shill and I really hate using that word, but seriously the dude sounds like he was paid to put a positive review up.
>Nobody calls attention that they're women
>Chris Hemsworth draws a logo with big boobs.
"So,"
>close the window
Truth
Guys I'm thinking he's not paid. He just has really really shit taste.
Most of his responses are sound genuine. He's said more than a few times some people won't like it and that if you don't like it you shouldn't hide that your are. I think he might be just a poor nice and naive soul.
Does Chris know he is a meme?
Sup Forums is no different other than the fact that we can remain anonymous and not get downvoted to oblivion.
>shopping reality to make it conform to your cuck fantasy
disgusting honestly
No one is saying it was paid, only that his opinion is objectively shit
...
youtube.com
Yeah, he's a fucking idiot.
>shop
What year do you think it is?
>That Subscriber count
>Got to see it early
He's either paid or a lying idiot hoping to ride the hype and get views.
but thats part of the game, user. just wait and see who will snap first
We need to sculpt his poor innocent mind.
>he must be paid because he likes a movie I don't like
Or maybe he just, you know, has shit taste. I mean, there are people out there who like Kirk Cameron's movies for fuck sake.
>I totally would never do that guys, you can trust me :^)
The review guy is actually cool and "Dan" just shows how pathetic sounding the Sony shill conspirators are.
>why do these guys all look and think the same.
because the ones that don't were not included on the picture
> there are people out there who like Kirk Cameron's movies
There is no way that's true
Then he's a lying idiot.
There's no way he was deemed useful enough to see it.
All White cucks match that picture. Meme magic
>I'm confused, he says youtube gave him the chance to go see the movie?He has like no subscribers,
Ding ding ding....probably a lying fuck
PLEASE GIVE ME VIEWS: the video
the guy from Wrecklesseating got invited by a friend to a screening, and his friend wasn't even a critic
and Wrecklesseating aren't really notorious for movie reviews
he saw it and trashed it
If it was possible a guy like him got to see it early, then it's probably possible for other people to.
He's not getting paid by Sony. He's lying and getting paid by ads
>Massive budget marketing campaigns try to influence social media.
This isn't a conspiracy. It's common sense.
cuck is fucking desperate for views
So how?
>If I can't get this Youtube channel off the ground, I'll have to actually go and apply for a real job... and my liberal arts degree won't help me find one of those!
.
I don't know left behind was pretty kino for a protest flick
even his responses are effeminate. I hope some day he'll find a brightly dyed haired woman to peg him as he likes
the same way you get anything else early: have connections.
Who the fuck is this nobody connected to?
>complaining about negativity on the internet
Maybe his friend from college works for whatever shitty website and got two tickets for a preview screening? It's really not that difficult to get into early screenings, I mean it's not like he got invited to some fucking Cannes red carpet event.
He says he got to go see it at Youtube. That shit doesn't make sense. Does that mean youtube itself was screening it? Does that mean youtube sent out invites?
Either way he's lying about something.
Just look at him. Tell me this isn't exactly who Sony made thus movie for (besides green/blue haired feminists) He was carefully selected by Sony to shill for this shit. The best part is that he's gained about 20 new followers after over 8000 views. I guess people aren't as stupid as I thought.
Which is fine, except for his "youtube" claim.
This guy gets it.
>you had you're laugh
All I want for Christmas is a PSP
PSP
S
P
Your mom would be proud for breaking the computer she bought you
Kek
Maybe he means youtube headquarters?
that baby looks dark
projection, it's what's for summer
And why the fuck would youtube HQ be offering that? It makes no sense.
Fuck Youtube personalities. All of them.
you're a fucking idiot. That's exactly what I asked. Are they screening the movie at Youtube HQ? That rarely happens that a movie is screened for a large audience (large audience being big enough to have invited guests not on a reserved list) at a company's HQ unless that company was involved in the production of the film. Early screeners are done at studio owned theaters, or through theater chains on off hours (like the middle of the day as to not draw attention).
So:
A) He got a very special invite from Youtube to attend an ultra private screening for the movie ahead of the premier even though he has no subscribers
B) He knows someone who got an invite from youtube and somehow he got to go, but if it was this open it would not be held at Youtube HQ's.
C) He didn't get shit and he's lying about seeing it.
All options point to either lying or shillery.
twitter.com
it says "sneak peak" but in the image itself, it says Screening. Weird.
>you're a fucking idiot.
Eat a dick, you piece of shit. I thought you meant something else, like a screening via youtube.
>Guy never reviewed a movie in his video
>There are 8 videos in the account
Don't care if someone like it or not, but this really sounds like an attempt to market the movie
I just realized, the reviewer is in the replies
twitter.com
So this confirms there was a screening at Youtube headquarters.
That's what newborns look like. They're red and this one is in the shadows.
So confirmed shill.
And I'm sure Sony had no hand in this.
Pretty Much It? What the fuck happened to these guys? They used to have like a movie news show. It's a bit sad. They weren't like Screen Junkies or anything and weren't afraid to say "faggot" every once in a while.