Best film?

Best film?

Andrei Rublev.

mirror is imo.

hes the best ever

>hes the best ever
lol get some taste kid

he literally is, no one has elevated cinema as much as he did.

plenty have. Godard for one. much more so than tarshitsky

mirror > stalker > andrei rublev > nostalghia > solaris > ivans childhood > the sacrifice

Erm he clearly is. Name one better

godard

Griffith, Ford, Welles, Antonioni, Godard, Kurosawa all did far more than little Tarkovsky

>godard
now I know you are a massive pleb.

not that guy but godard isn't even a top 5 french director

seriously cmon, at least try

>Godard
Hes in my top3 but i feel the andreis films have a grander scope

Could you explain to me what The Mirror was about? I barely recall. Why was it good? Write something in detail, please.

Is Tarkovsky the original king of Sup Forums?

I didn't expect much more from Tarredditsky spammers.
Tarkovsky, Bergman, Tarr, Truffaut, Bresson, the list goes on...

get some original, it doesn't even have to be good, taste for once

Yet Godards influence to cinema was far bigger than Andrei's

What a bitch lmao.

QUADS CONFIRM
TARSHITSKY = BITCH

REDDITORS BTFO

People like you are the reason only capeshit gets posted. Directors aren't fashion statements.

yes, clearly you retards are so much better than capeshitters what with spamming the same director and such intelligent discussion as "hes the best ever"

>that list
>original
>names tark and then 2 of the french directors i was referencing ahead of godard, and 2 others who are commonly associated with tark for obvious reasons

literally what the fuck did he mean by this?

"no"

yes

its a meditation on life, specifically as a spiritual person with a russian/soviet background living in a semi-specific era.

I didn't say they were original you fucking retard. your ability to read is just as good as your ability to discern good cinema

You will seriously argue that Tarkovsky influenced cinema more than Godard? This is some top tier fangay shit

You sicken me

They might of been more influential in the development of the art form but none of them reached the artistic heights that tarkovsky did IMO

What the fuck does that even mean?

>things godardfags say

it means he was better at exploring and pushing the medium than your dumb meme director

Yes, the guy who made fiction films of "DUDE SLOW CINEMA WITH RELIGIOUS UNDERTONES" explored the medium more than the guy who pioneered the French new wave, made political documentaries, a rock documentary, numerous essay films, documentaries on cinema, genre films, self-reflective critiques, etc.

How about you watch more than three Godard films before spouing your retardation on the subject?

i bet you hate bresson too

...

>did he actually die not knowing he was a hack?
everytime

No. I actually don't hate any of the aforementioned directors except Truffaut. What I do hate is the obnoxious fanbase they've accumulated on Sup Forums who don't know shit about film but insist on speaking like they do (by way of insulting directors they have little knowledge of). And they spam these one-liner threads of "best movie?", "based Tarkovsky [same fucking images of his published diary screen capped]" and so on. and when someone pushes them to expand on what they got out of his films the best they can muster is "uhhh it's about life... in uh Russia..."

Godard is a asshole. Makes one decent film and thinks he is the shit.

Kill yourself
He literally is the best

Really, that's the best you got? A strawman image of his fan base, pretending that we don't actually like his films?
Nobody does that with *any* director en masse on Sup Forums and of course there have been great threads on Tarkovsky and his films; they're also ironically spurred usually by autists or plebs asserting that Tarks films are meaningless, boring, pretentious, and that we just pretend to like them or only like them for artificial and aesthetic reasons

Smokey and the Bandit.

Where the fuck did I say you don't actually like his films you fucking idiot? God almighty I fucking hate you illiterate asshats

>Ugh it's about life in Russia and stuff
>Implying we don't actually understand his films
>Implying there might not be anything to understand
>Implying that when we talk about our love for the films that it's superficial or meaningless

...

reminder

How the fuck am I implying you don't like his films you brain dead pleb? Here, I'll fucking tell you what I think you are, sans any vagueness: you're a bunch of illiterate high school morons who don't know shit about film and can't elaborate any opinions you hold because you're illiterate and don't know shit about film. Your threads are shit and I am happy to derail them every time.

>I feel intellectually threatened by strangers on the internet

no one feels intellectually threatened by IMDB-dwelling criterion shitters except the imaginary people in the mock situations you've concocted to validate your flimsy interest in film

BEST: Andrei Rublev
WORST: Solaris
FAVORITE: Nostalghia
OVERRATED: Stalker
UNDERRATED: The Sacrifice

Wait I'm not allowed to enjoy Criterion releases?

Why? They are a solid distributor.