I refute the concept of octaves

I refute the concept of octaves

nigger are you trying to refute regular periods of waves

No you don't.

I demand a formal proof within 10 minutes or else you fail the assignment, OP.

proof of what?

Yes

Ok

C1 C2 are not the same sound: C1 J1

But C1 and C2 are the same note, you're just forgetting to pitch down your music player by an octave each time C2 is played you pleb

>by an octave ea
You know that doesn't work

>C1 C2 are not the same sound
Duh, that's why they put 1 and 2 lmao

I refute the concept of flat and sharp notes.

Nobody is saying that they are the same note, altough C1 is implied in C2, please explain what are you actually refuting.

The system of octaves is to put multiples of the same wave-forms in some sort of order instead of every differentiation of Hz being its own unique snowflake, would you prefer there be a different system? One where we use numbers for each key on a piano, or something?

Well, eastern music is way different so I guess that's OK.

How many big music systems are in the world, Sup Forums?

>caring about notes

sure is pleb in here

gotta find something to argue about, everything in the world is objectively wrong and everyone's right about it

okay, so this is an argument abbout how wer represent two notes.

The two notes do have different frequencies, I think we an all agree there.
C1, lets say has a certain frequency x over [0,2pi]
C2, (y definition) has a frequency x*2 over [0,2pi]

so you can see CLEARLY that C1 and C2 are related by their frequency, namely x. so regardless of what you call C2, it willl still sound similar to c1 because it is a linear transformation of c1. you double the frequency for each octave.

are you retarded?

That C1 to C2 is the same sound or note or even an octave. I think I might be able to take it further through the examination of vibration when the sound is played

Eastern music isn't really different.
They just have notes between the western notes created using the same mathematical equation

they are a different pitch, so they are a different sound. yet they sound similar because of the frequency relationship

I would like a system that acknowledges the so called "doubling of waves" as incorrect in creating the actual relative or parent and child notes (if you will)

Is this bait, or are you special needs?

I refute the idea of music

ohhhhh, I see what you are saying.
You claim that Freq(C2) =/= 2*Freq(C1)

In reaality this probably is the case because of minute tuning errors, but it's all just theory and notation anyway. Would you rather we put a tolerance on each note in the scale?

i refute the idea of physical objects because waves of light bouncing off of them do not exist as i do not see them because i am blind

>Freq(C2) =/= 2*Freq(C1)
I think there's a better formula out there somewhere

Cages literally refuted any idea.

Do you also believe the Earth is flat?

one refutes the idea of self, just because one has indivdual thoughts doesn't mean one isn't connected to the all the way the one can't perceive

...

>>

I've been thinking about the relationship of the visual appearance of a curve to the straight line and with time; now if we add form, not mass I think I have a foothold to take us back a step from some crazy ideas

But isn't the octave basically the only stable point of reference in music, all other intervals start to clash depending on the type of intonation that you use, I don't see what other relation could serve as a standard. There surely can't be one that is even more simple than octaves. Also a bit of detour, I have absolute pitch, and octaves do have the same "colour" to them, but I know this is not the part that you are refuting, I just tought it would be interesting to share.

As a silly mate in acknowledgement of the potential and destructive capabilities of every unique personality, i refute your idea of nothing in belief something must exist to mean nothing

...

>

i said that nothing cant exist because something needs to exist for the sole purpose of me calling it retarded on the internet

...

nothing is something is nothing

wasnt this thread about octaves being stupid or something

these legs protruding out of its neck

I refute

>I refute a fundamental physical property

good luck with that op